[Bug tree-optimization/27392] [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

2006-05-04 Thread P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de


--- Comment #8 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de  
2006-05-04 09:38 ---

Hi!

My (not reduced) code compiles again!

Sorry for the delay, but compiling the whole does take some time...

Thanks a lot!

Philippe


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27392



[Bug tree-optimization/27392] [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

2006-05-04 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #9 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-05-04 10:49 ---
Fixed.


-- 

rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27392



[Bug tree-optimization/27392] [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

2006-05-03 Thread P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de


--- Comment #3 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de  
2006-05-03 11:44 ---

Hi!

I believe this could be related: compiling the following with any optimisation
(starting from -O1) causes the following error:

initFeldVonDatei.f90: In function 'initfeldvondateiphase2korn':
initFeldVonDatei.f90:1: internal compiler error: in n_of_executions_at_most, at
tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.

Shall I file a bug? Am I doing something wrong?

Thanks!

Philippe

PS: the build command I'm using:
gfortran -O1 -c Sources.f90

PPS: the source
  SUBROUTINE initFeldVonDateiPhase2Korn
!
  IMPLICIT   NONE
  INTEGER::   Grain_Number
  INTEGER, ALLOCATABLE::   New_number(:)
!
  Grain_Number = 0
  Reordering: DO
  IF ( ALL ( New_number .GT. 0 ) ) EXIT
  Grain_Number = Grain_Number + 1
  New_number(MINLOC(New_number)) = Grain_Number
  ENDDO Reordering
!
  RETURN
  END SUBROUTINE initFeldVonDateiPhase2Korn

PPPS: what I'm using:
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /USER/philippe/Irix/Gcc_Sources/configure
--prefix=/WORK/philippe/Tools/Gcc --enable-languages=c,fortran
--with-mpfr=/WORK/philippe/Tools/Mpfr --with-gmp=/WORK/philippe/Tools/Gmp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20060502 (experimental)


-- 

P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||P dot Schaffnit at access
   ||dot rwth-aachen dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27392



[Bug tree-optimization/27392] [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

2006-05-03 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-05-03 17:10 ---
Phillipe,

Your code appears to be wrong, or perhaps you've cut down a
larger code too agressively.  You use the Fortran ALL intrinsic
on the allocatable NEW_NUMBER, but you have never actually
allocated memory for the array.

-- 
steve 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27392



[Bug tree-optimization/27392] [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

2006-05-03 Thread P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de


--- Comment #5 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de  
2006-05-03 19:28 ---

Erm... sorry about that, I didn't think about it: I've indeed thrown out a lot
(I do not have the original sources at hand, but they are happily compiled by
quite a few compilers, including lf95, as far as I can tell, is a
reference...): anyway, I thought that the mere fact that *any* code causes an
ICE is bad, I hoped this could help, I'll try to reduce it a bit less
aggressively tomorrow...

Philippe

(In reply to comment #4)
 Phillipe,
 
 Your code appears to be wrong, or perhaps you've cut down a
 larger code too agressively.  You use the Fortran ALL intrinsic
 on the allocatable NEW_NUMBER, but you have never actually
 allocated memory for the array.
 
 -- 
 steve 
 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27392



[Bug tree-optimization/27392] [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

2006-05-03 Thread rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz


--- Comment #6 from rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz  
2006-05-03 19:34 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at
tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

The problem in this PR should have been fixed by my yesterday's patch,
does this still reproduce for you?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27392



[Bug tree-optimization/27392] [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

2006-05-03 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca


--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2006-05-03 
19:39 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at
tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

 The problem in this PR should have been fixed by my yesterday's patch,
 does this still reproduce for you?

The Ada ICE nolonger occurs.

Thanks,
Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27392



[Bug tree-optimization/27392] [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772

2006-05-02 Thread schwab at suse dot de


--- Comment #2 from schwab at suse dot de  2006-05-02 16:43 ---
Triggered by r113425.


-- 

schwab at suse dot de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27392