[Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

2009-01-05 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com 


--- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com  2009-01-05 18:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=17034)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17034action=view)
preprocessed source


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593

[Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

2009-01-05 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-05 21:48 
---
That's really a duplicate of PR38725: The code contains many lines of the form

  goto *dispatch_table[opcode];

where dispatch_table[opcode] is of the type uintptr_t which is a typedef
to unsigned int. Writing

  goto *(void*)dispatch_table[opcode];

instead makes the ICE disappear.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38725 ***


-- 

reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593

[Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

2009-01-04 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-04 22:08 
---
Maybe the bug boils down to PR38725.


-- 

reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593

[Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

2009-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-02 11:34 ---
That's unexpected.  Anyway, if you move away the gch file (or directory), can
you still reproduce it and if yes, attach preprocessed source?

Otherwise it would be extremely hard to reproduce for anyone...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593

[Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

2008-12-22 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com 


--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com  2008-12-22 10:58 ---
no, same result.

btw, in the generated .ii file using -D__disable_PCH__ -save-temps, the
precompiled header is still referenced.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593

[Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

2008-12-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
  Component|target  |tree-optimization
   Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593

[Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

2008-12-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-21 17:27 ---
Does disabling PCH fix the issue (just adding -D__disable_PCH__ should be
enough to disable PCH when building that one file)?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593