[Bug tree-optimization/42341] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:228

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-23 15:51 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41159 ***


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42341

[Bug tree-optimization/42341] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:228

[danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-07 17:52 ---
gcc.dg/lto/20090116 fails on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 as shown in #1.


-- 

danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-03-07 17:52:40
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42341

[Bug tree-optimization/42341] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:228

[ubizjak at gmail dot com]

--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2009-12-09 11:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=19264)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19264action=view)
Object file that triggers the ICE.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42341

[Bug tree-optimization/42341] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:228

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-09 11:35 ---
How was the object file built?  (I suppose this is simply a testsuite failure
of gcc.dg/lto/20090116?)

There was a dup for this for other archs I believe and the issue is
basically -Ox vs. -O0 compile which breaks some out-of-SSA invariants.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
   Keywords||lto


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42341

[Bug tree-optimization/42341] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:228

[ubizjak at gmail dot com]

--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2009-12-09 13:03 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 How was the object file built?  (I suppose this is simply a testsuite failure
 of gcc.dg/lto/20090116?)
 
 There was a dup for this for other archs I believe and the issue is
 basically -Ox vs. -O0 compile which breaks some out-of-SSA invariants.

Yes, it was built with:

/home/uros/gcc-build-alpha/gcc/xgcc -B/home/uros/gcc-build-alpha/gcc/ -O1
-fwhopr -fPIC  -c  -o c_lto_20090116_0.o
/home/uros/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090116_0.c

(I'm not aware of any similar bugreport).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42341