[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-10 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #9 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-10 12:54 
---
Subject: Bug 43236

Author: amonakov
Date: Wed Mar 10 12:53:51 2010
New Revision: 157339

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157339
Log:
PR tree-optimization/43236
* tree-loop-distribution.c (generate_memset_zero): Fix off-by-one
error in calculation of base address in reverse iteration case.
(generate_builtin): Take number of latch executions if the statement
is in the latch.

* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43236.c: New.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43236.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-10 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #10 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-10 12:57 
---
Both issues are fixed with above commit.


-- 

amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-10 Thread sezeroz at gmail dot com


--- Comment #11 from sezeroz at gmail dot com  2010-03-10 14:17 ---
The testcase fails with 4.4 with -Ox -ftree-loop-distribution and the patch
does not apply to 4.4. Will there be a gcc-4.4 backport of this?


-- 

sezeroz at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sezeroz at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-09 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #8 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-09 16:55 
---
Given the fact that loop distribution only works for two-bb loops, I think the
fix is to simply take number of latch executions when the stmt is in the latch.

diff --git a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -389,6 +391,8 @@ generate_builtin (struct loop *loop, bitmap partition, bool
copy_p)
goto end;

  write = stmt;
+ if (bb == loop-latch)
+   nb_iter = number_of_latch_executions (loop);
}
}
 }


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-03 10:38 ---
Confirmed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
  Known to fail||4.4.3 4.5.0
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-03-03 10:38:17
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-03 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #6 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-03 13:06 
---
Not a regression, off-by-one error in reverse iteration case is since day one.
Patch:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
index 13ac7ea..110abdc 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ generate_memset_zero (gimple stmt, tree op0, tree nb_iter,
   addr_base = fold_convert_loc (loc, sizetype, addr_base);
   addr_base = size_binop_loc (loc, MINUS_EXPR, addr_base,
  fold_convert_loc (loc, sizetype, nb_bytes));
+  addr_base = size_binop_loc (loc, PLUS_EXPR, addr_base,
+ TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (op0)));
   addr_base = fold_build2_loc (loc, POINTER_PLUS_EXPR,
   TREE_TYPE (DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dr)),
   DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dr), addr_base);

This fixes the -O[123] miscompilations. -Os is slightly harder to fix, since we
use wrong number of iterations (cond bb is executed 11 times, latch bb with
assignment 10 times).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-03 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #7 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-03 13:38 
---
(In reply to comment #6)
 This fixes the -O[123] miscompilations. -Os is slightly harder to fix, since 
 we
 use wrong number of iterations (cond bb is executed 11 times, latch bb with
 assignment 10 times).

I don't see what is the proper fix for the -Os problem.  The loop structure is
as follows:
bb2
i = 20
goto bb4

 bb3
  i--
  a[i] = 0
 bb4
  if (i  10) goto bb3
Thus, bb4 is header, bb3 is latch, number_of_exit_cond_executions() is 11,
just_once_each_iteration_p() is true for both bb3 and bb4 (?!)


-- 

amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-02 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz


--- Comment #1 from zsojka at seznam dot cz  2010-03-02 20:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=20005)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20005action=view)
this patch causes bootstrap with BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -ftree-loop-distribution to
assert

Assert message is:
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function
#8216;__mulvdi3#8217;:
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:400:1: internal compiler error: in
delete_output_reload, at reload1.c:8543
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.

which is:
gcc_assert(spill_reg_store[last_reload_reg + k] == 0);


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-02 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz


--- Comment #2 from zsojka at seznam dot cz  2010-03-02 20:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=20006)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20006action=view)
this patch causes regular bootstrap to assert

Assert message is:
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function
#8216;__mulvdi3#8217;:
/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:400:1: internal compiler error: in
delete_output_reload, at reload1.c:8543
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.

which is:
gcc_assert(spill_reg_store[last_reload_reg + k] == 0);


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-02 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz


--- Comment #3 from zsojka at seznam dot cz  2010-03-03 06:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=20008)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20008action=view)
minimal executable testcase

Fails when compiled with -ftree-loop-distribution at all -O[123s] levels:
$ /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-157161/bin/gcc pr43236.c -O1
-ftree-loop-distribution  ./a.out
Aborted


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236



[Bug tree-optimization/43236] -ftree-loop-distribution produces wrong code in reload1.c:delete_output_reload(), bootstrap fails

2010-03-02 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz


--- Comment #4 from zsojka at seznam dot cz  2010-03-03 06:30 ---
(In reply to comment #3)

When output is uncommented, -Os shows different behaviour than -O[123] (but
still wrong):
-Os zeroes items [8] - [18]
-O[123] zeroes [9] - [18]
expected is [10] - [19]


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43236