[Bug tree-optimization/45733] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04 11:32:23 UTC --- I have a patch.
[Bug tree-optimization/45733] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04 12:42:59 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Nov 4 12:42:57 2010 New Revision: 166308 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166308 Log: 2010-11-04 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de PR tree-optimization/45733 * tree-vect-stmts.c (reverse_vec_elements): Honor the permute builtins function return type. * gcc.dg/pr45733.c: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr45733.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
[Bug tree-optimization/45733] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04 12:43:36 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug tree-optimization/45733] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1
[Bug tree-optimization/45733] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize
--- Comment #1 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-09-20 11:43 --- Created an attachment (id=21848) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21848action=view) reduced testcase $ gcc -O -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize pr45733.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
[Bug tree-optimization/45733] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize
--- Comment #2 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2010-09-20 12:17 --- Looks like it is caused by revision 164367: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00661.html -- irar at il dot ibm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-09-20 12:17:14 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
[Bug tree-optimization/45733] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize
--- Comment #3 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2010-09-20 13:08 --- For vector(2) void * we get vec_perm_v2di_u builtin declaration, because the mode of vector(2) void * is unsigned V2DI. I wonder if this can happen for every builtin call, and we should convert back to the original type everywhere? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
[Bug tree-optimization/45733] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize
--- Comment #4 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-20 13:17 --- Yeah, probably some fold_convert is missing in reverse_vec_elements() in case the type of the args or the return type of the chosen builtin decl don't exactly match. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
[Bug tree-optimization/45733] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -fstrict-overflow -ftree-vectorize
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-20 19:50 --- (In reply to comment #2) Looks like it is caused by revision 164367: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00661.html Revision 164367 is the cause. Revision 164367 also caused PR 45720. Don't know if they are related. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733