[Bug tree-optimization/49498] [5/6/7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning (predicate analysis bugs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #30 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri Mar 31 15:26:18 2017 New Revision: 246618 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246618=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/49498 * gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c: Reenable DOM. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c
[Bug tree-optimization/49498] [5/6/7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning (predicate analysis bugs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #29 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yes, I checked cris-elf. I've got the patch to reenable DOM for that test in my local tree.
[Bug tree-optimization/49498] [5/6/7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning (predicate analysis bugs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #28 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #27) > Must. Read. dg-comments in testcase. More. Carefully. > > > This was actually fixed a couple years ago with some pass ordering changes. > The testsuite hack mentioned in c#12 is no longer needed. Hmm, note the report states it worked on x86_64/i586/arm anyway and only some other archs were broken. Did you verify any of those? Iff it's really fixed we should remove the testcase workaround (enable DOM again). A quick check on avr doesn't reproduce the issue when re-enabling DOM.
[Bug tree-optimization/49498] [5/6/7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning (predicate analysis bugs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #27 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Must. Read. dg-comments in testcase. More. Carefully. This was actually fixed a couple years ago with some pass ordering changes. The testsuite hack mentioned in c#12 is no longer needed.
[Bug tree-optimization/49498] [5/6/7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning (predicate analysis bugs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #26 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So I had hoped this old BZ would be fixed by the changes for 71437. Sadly, that is not the case. *But* the WIP for for 78496 does happen to fix this BZ. In fact, we only need the hunks from 78496 which are inexpensive. So I may carve those out and push them forward as a fix for this BZ as well as an improvement for 78496.
