[Bug tree-optimization/81884] [6/7/8 Regression] Invalid code generation with zero size arrays or flexible array members
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81884 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #42000|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 42003 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42003=edit updated patch
[Bug tree-optimization/81884] [6/7/8 Regression] Invalid code generation with zero size arrays or flexible array members
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81884 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Regresses gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f because we no longer DSE @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ _28 = *weight_94(D); _29 = _27 * _28; _30 = _10 + _29; + *s_91(D)[_9] = _30; _173 = _12 + 9; _174 = _17 + _173; _175 = _19 + _174; @@ -226,6 +227,7 @@ _193 = _189 * _192; _194 = _28 * _193; _195 = _185 + _194; + *s_91(D)[_9] = _195; ... so the restriction is too broad. Now the question is if we want to allow struct S { int a[0]; }; struct S (*p)[1]; and (*p)[0].a[4]. Or array of size n and (*p)[n-1].a[4]...
[Bug tree-optimization/81884] [6/7/8 Regression] Invalid code generation with zero size arrays or flexible array members
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81884 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 42000 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42000=edit patch in testing
[Bug tree-optimization/81884] [6/7/8 Regression] Invalid code generation with zero size arrays or flexible array members
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81884 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work||5.4.0 Target Milestone|--- |6.5 Summary|Invalid code generation |[6/7/8 Regression] Invalid |with zero size arrays or|code generation with zero |flexible array members |size arrays or flexible ||array members