[Bug tree-optimization/84050] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org  |unassigned at gcc dot 
gnu.org
 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor  ---
I'm no longer working on this.

[Bug tree-optimization/84050] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||marco.morandini at polimi dot 
it

--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski  ---
*** Bug 102422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/84050] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050

--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski  ---
reduced testcase:
static int b[3] = { 1, 2, 3 };

int fstatic_array (void)
{
  return b[7];   // missing -Warray-bounds
}

[Bug tree-optimization/84050] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.