[Bug tree-optimization/99475] [11 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds accessing an array element of empty structs

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail||11.5.0
   Target Milestone|11.5|12.0
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener  ---
Fixed in GCC 12.

[Bug tree-optimization/99475] [11 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds accessing an array element of empty structs

[egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needs-bisection

--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Siddhesh Poyarekar from comment #7)
> This doesn't appear to be reproducible on trunk anymore, should we close it?

Might be worth bisecting to find out when exactly it was fixed, but I'll leave
that decision up to someone else to make...

[Bug tree-optimization/99475] [11 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds accessing an array element of empty structs

[siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475

Siddhesh Poyarekar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Siddhesh Poyarekar  ---
This doesn't appear to be reproducible on trunk anymore, should we close it?

[Bug tree-optimization/99475] [11 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds accessing an array element of empty structs

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|10.5|11.5

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.