[Bug web/55954] Bugzilla breaks mail threading
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55954 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 13:18:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Without the New I can't keep track of new bugs at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2013-01/ which is how I monitor and respond to libstdc++ bugs. Me too, I'd rather not lose New: markers. Pretty please. Thus - WONTFIX. It's a MUA error not to look at In-Reply-To.
[Bug web/55954] Bugzilla breaks mail threading
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55954 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-12 14:49:43 UTC --- Without the New I can't keep track of new bugs at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2013-01/ which is how I monitor and respond to libstdc++ bugs.
[Bug web/55954] Bugzilla breaks mail threading
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55954 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-12 04:59:12 UTC --- I think it is really a bug in the mail clients if they don't just use In-Reply-To instead.
[Bug web/55954] Bugzilla breaks mail threading
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55954 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-12 05:06:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I think it is really a bug in the mail clients if they don't just use In-Reply-To instead. The reason why I say that is because some mail clients other things than just Re:. Some use the native language version instead like AW or SV. So again the mail client is broken and we really should not be working around broken mail clients if they cannot handle the case new is added to the subject.
