Re: [AArch64] effective_target for aarch64 f64mm asm

2020-01-21 Thread Richard Sandiford
Matthew Malcomson  writes:
> Commit 9ceec73 introduced intrinsics for the AArch64 FP64 matrix
> multiply instructions.  These require binutils support for the same
> instructions.
> ( See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01234.html for the
> testsuite failures this introduced. )
>
> This patch adds a DejaGNU test to ensure this binutils support is there
> and uses it in the files that need this test.
>
> NOTE:
> I tried to find some way to run the assembly tests if the given version
> of binutils is available, but run the compile tests if not.  This is
> pretty awkward -- It seems I either have to duplicate all the DejaGNU
> comments between two files, or write filename exceptions into the
> list of files that aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp runs tests for.
>
> I decided to not do either, since I figure not running the tests on
> older binutils isn't too bad compared to having a bunch more DejaGNU
> stuff making the tests harder to read.
>
> Testing Done:
> Checked on a cross-compiler that:
> Tests running for binutils commit e264b5b7a are listed as UNSUPPORTED.
> Tests running for binutils commit 26916852e all pass.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2020-01-21  Matthew Malcomson  
>
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f16.c: Use require
>   directive.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f32.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f64.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s16.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s32.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s64.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s8.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_u16.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_u32.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_u64.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_u8.c: Likewise.
>   * lib/target-supports.exp: Add assembly requirement directive.
> [...]
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp 
> b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> index 
> cdee31e24132b591625168ab588e61a3943919b0..c9184728f26918dbaea4bb09ab99df890571069b
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> @@ -8987,7 +8987,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_aarch64_tiny { } {
>  # Create functions to check that the AArch64 assembler supports the
>  # various architecture extensions via the .arch_extension pseudo-op.
>  
> -foreach { aarch64_ext } { "fp" "simd" "crypto" "crc" "lse" "dotprod" "sve"} {
> +foreach { aarch64_ext } { "fp" "simd" "crypto" "crc" "lse" "dotprod" "sve" 
> "f64mm"} {

It would be good to keep this under the 80 char limit, e.g.:

foreach aarch64_ext {"fp" "simd" "crypto" "crc" "lse" "dotprod" "sve"
 "f64mm"} {

(Not that the file is very consistent about doing that.)

OK with that change, thanks.

Richard


[AArch64] effective_target for aarch64 f64mm asm

2020-01-21 Thread Matthew Malcomson
Commit 9ceec73 introduced intrinsics for the AArch64 FP64 matrix
multiply instructions.  These require binutils support for the same
instructions.
( See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01234.html for the
testsuite failures this introduced. )

This patch adds a DejaGNU test to ensure this binutils support is there
and uses it in the files that need this test.

NOTE:
I tried to find some way to run the assembly tests if the given version
of binutils is available, but run the compile tests if not.  This is
pretty awkward -- It seems I either have to duplicate all the DejaGNU
comments between two files, or write filename exceptions into the
list of files that aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp runs tests for.

I decided to not do either, since I figure not running the tests on
older binutils isn't too bad compared to having a bunch more DejaGNU
stuff making the tests harder to read.

Testing Done:
Checked on a cross-compiler that:
Tests running for binutils commit e264b5b7a are listed as UNSUPPORTED.
Tests running for binutils commit 26916852e all pass.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2020-01-21  Matthew Malcomson  

* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f16.c: Use require
directive.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f32.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f64.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s32.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s64.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s8.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_u16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_u32.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_u64.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_u8.c: Likewise.
* lib/target-supports.exp: Add assembly requirement directive.



### Attachment also inlined for ease of reply###


diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f16.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f16.c
index 
7badc75a43ab2009e9406afc04c980fc01834716..6eb94f1ca5fda961bb23f5c4cf66bc5694d26f36
 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f16.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f16.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "-DCHECK_ASM" } } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv8.6-a+sve+f64mm" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target aarch64_asm_f64mm_ok }  */
 
 #include "test_sve_acle.h"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f32.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f32.c
index 
dd8a1c53cd0fb7b7acd0b92394f3977382ac26e0..0a77c37ddd5978db765b4bad23f24da82a0aed11
 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f32.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f32.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "-DCHECK_ASM" } } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv8.6-a+sve+f64mm" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target aarch64_asm_f64mm_ok }  */
 
 #include "test_sve_acle.h"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f64.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f64.c
index 
30563698310f65060d34be4bef4c57a74ef9d734..65c6d9b02b804a1480cd5014c8f0ca5f534bacbe
 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f64.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_f64.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "-DCHECK_ASM" } } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv8.6-a+sve+f64mm" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target aarch64_asm_f64mm_ok }  */
 
 #include "test_sve_acle.h"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s16.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s16.c
index 
d4702fa6cc15e9f93751d8579cfecfd37759306e..e3dc9bd51cf93c2f97e4277181e686d0bf53a1ea
 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s16.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s16.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "-DCHECK_ASM" } } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv8.6-a+sve+f64mm" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target aarch64_asm_f64mm_ok }  */
 
 #include "test_sve_acle.h"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s32.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s32.c
index 
4604b0b5fbfb716ae814bf88f7acfe8bf0eaa9f5..f3af8e5cc25791a56930618abf5c092d51e94e9b
 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s32.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_s32.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "-DCHECK_ASM" } } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv8.6-a+sve+f64mm" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target aarch64_asm_f64mm_ok }  */
 
 #include "test_sve_acl