Hi all,
two weeks have passed with no complains about the patch for PR103970. Therefore
backported and pushed to gcc-11 as 680ee9c3332.
Regards,
Andre
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:39:17 +0100
Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> I don't know why that bootstrapped initially. I fixed the patch (naming a
> ```
> else
> /* Prevent warning. */
> cdesc = NULL_TREE;
> ```
> obvious) and rerun bootstrap making sure to purge everything beforehand. It
> did not break bootstrap on x86_64-linux/f35. Hope it doesn't elsewhere with
> submit 26e237fb5b8.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> Regards,
> Andre
>
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:36:23 +0100
> Andre Vehreschild via Fortran <fort...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tobias,
> >
> > ups, sorry, reverted immediately.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andre
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:27:26 +0100
> > Tobias Burnus <tob...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andre,
> > >
> > > your patch breaks bootstrapping:
> > >
> > > ../../repos/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc: In function ‘tree_node*
> > > structure_alloc_comps(gfc_symbol*, tree, tree, int, int, int,
> > > gfc_co_subroutines_args*)’:
> > > ../../repos/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc:9200:42: error: ‘cdesc’ may be
> > > used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] 9200 |
> > > gfc_conv_descriptor_data_set (&tmpblock, cdesc, comp); |
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ../../repos/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc:9082:16: note: ‘cdesc’ was
> > > declared here 9082 | tree cdesc; | ^~~~~ cc1plus:
> > > all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [Makefile:1143:
> > > fortran/trans-array.o] Error 1
> > >
> > > Tobias
> > >
> > > On 28.01.22 10:07, Andre Vehreschild via Fortran wrote:
> > > > Hi Harald,
> > > >
> > > > thanks for the fast review. I have submitted as c9c48ab7bad.
> > > >
> > > > Will wait for two weeks (reminder set :-)) before backporting to gcc-11.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you and regards,
> > > > Andre
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:30:22 +0100
> > > > Harald Anlauf via Fortran <fort...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Andre',
> > > >>
> > > >> Am 25.01.22 um 17:32 schrieb Andre Vehreschild via Fortran:
> > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> attached patch fixes wrong code generation when broadcasting a derived
> > > >>> type containing allocatable and non-allocatable scalars. Furthermore
> > > >>> does it prevent broadcasting of coarray-tokens, which are always local
> > > >>> this_image. Thus having them on a different image makes no sense.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Bootstrapped and regtested ok on x86_64-linux/F35.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Ok, for trunk and backport to 12 and 11-branch after decent time?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I perceived that 12 is closed for this kind of bugfix, therefore
> > > >>> asking ok for 13.
> > > >> I do not think that 12 is closed for bugfixing, especially not for
> > > >> fortran. And if my cursory reading of the patch is not misleading,
> > > >> the impact of the patch is really limited to coarrays.
> > > >>
> > > >> You may want to wait for another 1-2 days for additional comments.
> > > >> If not, it is OK from my side.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for the patch!
> > > >>
> > > >> Harald
> > > >>
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Andre
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> > > -----------------
> > > Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201,
> > > 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer:
> > > Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München;
> > > Registergericht München, HRB 106955
> >
> >
>
>
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
