I'm planning to push the attached 1-liner bug fix to mainline tomorrow, when
testing has completed. I think this qualifies as "obvious". There's no test
case because I discovered it while testing the updated loop transformation
patches, which are still a work in progress; it fixed an ICE in the newly-added
tests for that. This is clearly just a bug in existing code unrelated to the
new functionality, though.
-Sandra
commit 4c3db8cf0611fa99886d698b62102ba15058776f
Author: Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed Sep 27 03:21:43 2023 +0000
OpenMP: GIMPLE_OMP_STRUCTURED_BLOCK bug fix
This is a bug fix for commit a62c8324e7e31ae6614f549bdf9d8a653233f8fc,
which added GIMPLE_OMP_STRUCTURED_BLOCK. I found a big switch statement
over gimple codes that needs to know about this new node, but didn't.
gcc/ChangeLog
* gimple.cc (gimple_copy): Add case GIMPLE_OMP_STRUCTURED_BLOCK.
diff --git a/gcc/gimple.cc b/gcc/gimple.cc
index d5a4f634416..46f28784e07 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple.cc
@@ -2163,6 +2163,7 @@ gimple_copy (gimple *stmt)
case GIMPLE_OMP_SECTION:
case GIMPLE_OMP_MASTER:
+ case GIMPLE_OMP_STRUCTURED_BLOCK:
copy_omp_body:
new_seq = gimple_seq_copy (gimple_omp_body (stmt));
gimple_omp_set_body (copy, new_seq);
