subject:"\[PATCH\/AARCH64\] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan."

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

2016-07-15 Thread James Greenhalgh

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:08:11AM +0530, Virendra Pathak wrote:
> Hi James/Julian,
> 
> Kindly merge this patch to the trunk.

Done as r238372.

Thanks,
James

> >>> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>>
> >>> Virendra Pathak  
> >>> Julian Brown  
> >>>
> >>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Update vulcan COSTS.
> >>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
> >>> (vulcan_extra_costs): New variable.
> >>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> >>> (vulcan_addrcost_table): Likewise.
> >>> (vulcan_regmove_cost): Likewise.
> >>> (vulcan_vector_cost): Likewise.
> >>> (vulcan_branch_cost): Likewise.
> >>> (vulcan_tunings): Likewise.

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

2016-07-14 Thread Virendra Pathak

Hi James/Julian,

Kindly merge this patch to the trunk.
Thanks.

>> Julian has commit rights and is on the ChangeLog, so I'll let him
>> commit the patch on your behalf.
> Julian, Kindly commit the patch to the trunk.
>

with regards,
Virendra Pathak


On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Virendra Pathak
 wrote:
> Hi James,
>
>> This patch is OK.
> Thanks for the review.
>
>> Julian has commit rights and is on the ChangeLog, so I'll let him
>> commit the patch on your behalf.
> Julian, Kindly commit the patch to the trunk.
>
> Thanks.
>
> with regards,
> Virendra Pathak
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:28 PM, James Greenhalgh
>  wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:01:33PM +0530, Virendra Pathak wrote:
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> Please find the patch after taking care of your comments.
>>>
>>>
>>> > Did you see those patches, and did you consider whether there would be a
>>> > benefit to doing the same for Vulcan?
>>> In our simulation environment, we did not observe any performance gain
>>> for specfp2006.
>>> However, we did it to keep the cost strategy same as cortexa-57/53.
>>>
>>> Please review and merge to trunk.
>>
>> Hi Virendra,
>>
>> This patch is OK.
>>
>> Julian has commit rights and is on the ChangeLog, so I'll let him
>> commit the patch on your behalf.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> James
>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> Virendra Pathak  
>>> Julian Brown  
>>>
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Update vulcan COSTS.
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
>>> (vulcan_extra_costs): New variable.
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>>> (vulcan_addrcost_table): Likewise.
>>> (vulcan_regmove_cost): Likewise.
>>> (vulcan_vector_cost): Likewise.
>>> (vulcan_branch_cost): Likewise.
>>> (vulcan_tunings): Likewise.
>>

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

2016-07-11 Thread Virendra Pathak

Hi James,

> This patch is OK.
Thanks for the review.

> Julian has commit rights and is on the ChangeLog, so I'll let him
> commit the patch on your behalf.
Julian, Kindly commit the patch to the trunk.

Thanks.

with regards,
Virendra Pathak


On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:28 PM, James Greenhalgh
 wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:01:33PM +0530, Virendra Pathak wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>> Please find the patch after taking care of your comments.
>>
>>
>> > Did you see those patches, and did you consider whether there would be a
>> > benefit to doing the same for Vulcan?
>> In our simulation environment, we did not observe any performance gain
>> for specfp2006.
>> However, we did it to keep the cost strategy same as cortexa-57/53.
>>
>> Please review and merge to trunk.
>
> Hi Virendra,
>
> This patch is OK.
>
> Julian has commit rights and is on the ChangeLog, so I'll let him
> commit the patch on your behalf.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> Virendra Pathak  
>> Julian Brown  
>>
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Update vulcan COSTS.
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
>> (vulcan_extra_costs): New variable.
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> (vulcan_addrcost_table): Likewise.
>> (vulcan_regmove_cost): Likewise.
>> (vulcan_vector_cost): Likewise.
>> (vulcan_branch_cost): Likewise.
>> (vulcan_tunings): Likewise.
>

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

2016-07-11 Thread James Greenhalgh

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:01:33PM +0530, Virendra Pathak wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> Please find the patch after taking care of your comments.
> 
> 
> > Did you see those patches, and did you consider whether there would be a
> > benefit to doing the same for Vulcan?
> In our simulation environment, we did not observe any performance gain
> for specfp2006.
> However, we did it to keep the cost strategy same as cortexa-57/53.
> 
> Please review and merge to trunk.

Hi Virendra,

This patch is OK.

Julian has commit rights and is on the ChangeLog, so I'll let him
commit the patch on your behalf.

Thanks,
James

> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> Virendra Pathak  
> Julian Brown  
> 
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Update vulcan COSTS.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
> (vulcan_extra_costs): New variable.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> (vulcan_addrcost_table): Likewise.
> (vulcan_regmove_cost): Likewise.
> (vulcan_vector_cost): Likewise.
> (vulcan_branch_cost): Likewise.
> (vulcan_tunings): Likewise.

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

2016-07-08 Thread Virendra Pathak

Hi James,

Please find the patch after taking care of your comments.


> Did you see those patches, and did you consider whether there would be a
> benefit to doing the same for Vulcan?
In our simulation environment, we did not observe any performance gain
for specfp2006.
However, we did it to keep the cost strategy same as cortexa-57/53.

Please review and merge to trunk.


gcc/ChangeLog:

Virendra Pathak  <virendra.pat...@broadcom.com>
Julian Brown  <jul...@codesourcery.com>

* config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Update vulcan COSTS.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
(vulcan_extra_costs): New variable.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c
(vulcan_addrcost_table): Likewise.
(vulcan_regmove_cost): Likewise.
(vulcan_vector_cost): Likewise.
(vulcan_branch_cost): Likewise.
(vulcan_tunings): Likewise.



with regards,
Virendra Pathak


On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Virendra Pathak
<virendra.pat...@broadcom.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
>> Did you see those patches, and did you consider whether there would be a
>> benefit to doing the same for Vulcan?
> No. I have not studied those patches yet. Currently I am working on
> adding vulcan scheduler as a next patch.
> Kindly advise on the following:
> Could this patch be merged now (assuming you are okay),
> and I will update vulcan costs based on your patch later (after vulcan
> scheduler)?
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> with regards,
> Virendra Pathak
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:11 PM, James Greenhalgh
> <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:45:21PM +0530, Virendra Pathak wrote:
>>> Hi gcc-patches group,
>>>
>>> Please find the patch for adding rtx_costs routine for vulcan cpu.
>>>
>>> Tested with compiling cross aarch64-linux-gcc , bootstrapped native
>>> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>> and make check (gcc). No new regression failure is added by this patch.
>>>
>>> Kindly review and merge the patch to trunk, if the patch is okay.
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> This is OK, but I have the same question for you as I had for the
>> qdf24xx tuning that Jim proposed, so I won't commit it yet...
>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> Virendra Pathak  <virendra.pat...@broadcom.com>
>>>
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Update vulcan COSTS.
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
>>> (vulcan_extra_costs): New variable.
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>>> (vulcan_addrcost_table): Likewise.
>>> (vulcan_regmove_cost): Likewise.
>>> (vulcan_vector_cost): Likewise.
>>> (vulcan_branch_cost): Likewise.
>>> (vulcan_tunings): Likewise.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> +  {
>>> +/* FP SFmode */
>>> +{
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (16),/* Div.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult_addsub. */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Fma.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Addsub.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Fpconst. */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Neg.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Compare.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Widen.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Narrow.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Toint.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Fromint.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7)  /* Roundint.  */
>>> +},
>>> +/* FP DFmode */
>>> +{
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (23),/* Div.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult_addsub.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Fma.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Addsub.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Fpconst.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Neg.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Compare.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Widen.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Narrow.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Toint.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Fromint.  */
>>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7)  /* Roundint.  */
>>> +}
>>
>> Recently ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00251.html ,
>>  https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01418.html ), I changed the
>> Cortex-A57 and Cortex-A53 cost tables to make the cost of a floating-point
>> operation relative to the cost of a floati

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

2016-06-29 Thread Virendra Pathak

Hi James,

> Did you see those patches, and did you consider whether there would be a
> benefit to doing the same for Vulcan?
No. I have not studied those patches yet. Currently I am working on
adding vulcan scheduler as a next patch.
Kindly advise on the following:
Could this patch be merged now (assuming you are okay),
and I will update vulcan costs based on your patch later (after vulcan
scheduler)?

Thanks for your time.

with regards,
Virendra Pathak


On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:11 PM, James Greenhalgh
 wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:45:21PM +0530, Virendra Pathak wrote:
>> Hi gcc-patches group,
>>
>> Please find the patch for adding rtx_costs routine for vulcan cpu.
>>
>> Tested with compiling cross aarch64-linux-gcc , bootstrapped native
>> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
>> and make check (gcc). No new regression failure is added by this patch.
>>
>> Kindly review and merge the patch to trunk, if the patch is okay.
>> Thanks.
>
> This is OK, but I have the same question for you as I had for the
> qdf24xx tuning that Jim proposed, so I won't commit it yet...
>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> Virendra Pathak  
>>
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Update vulcan COSTS.
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
>> (vulcan_extra_costs): New variable.
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> (vulcan_addrcost_table): Likewise.
>> (vulcan_regmove_cost): Likewise.
>> (vulcan_vector_cost): Likewise.
>> (vulcan_branch_cost): Likewise.
>> (vulcan_tunings): Likewise.
>
>
>>
>> +  {
>> +/* FP SFmode */
>> +{
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (16),/* Div.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult_addsub. */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Fma.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Addsub.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Fpconst. */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Neg.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Compare.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Widen.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Narrow.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Toint.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Fromint.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7)  /* Roundint.  */
>> +},
>> +/* FP DFmode */
>> +{
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (23),/* Div.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult_addsub.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Fma.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Addsub.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Fpconst.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Neg.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Compare.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Widen.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Narrow.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Toint.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Fromint.  */
>> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7)  /* Roundint.  */
>> +}
>
> Recently ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00251.html ,
>  https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01418.html ), I changed the
> Cortex-A57 and Cortex-A53 cost tables to make the cost of a floating-point
> operation relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This gave some
> code generation benefits, particularly around conditional execution and
> generation of constants.
>
> Did you see those patches, and did you consider whether there would be a
> benefit to doing the same for Vulcan?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

2016-06-29 Thread James Greenhalgh

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:45:21PM +0530, Virendra Pathak wrote:
> Hi gcc-patches group,
> 
> Please find the patch for adding rtx_costs routine for vulcan cpu.
> 
> Tested with compiling cross aarch64-linux-gcc , bootstrapped native
> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
> and make check (gcc). No new regression failure is added by this patch.
> 
> Kindly review and merge the patch to trunk, if the patch is okay.
> Thanks.

This is OK, but I have the same question for you as I had for the
qdf24xx tuning that Jim proposed, so I won't commit it yet...

> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> Virendra Pathak  
> 
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Update vulcan COSTS.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
> (vulcan_extra_costs): New variable.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> (vulcan_addrcost_table): Likewise.
> (vulcan_regmove_cost): Likewise.
> (vulcan_vector_cost): Likewise.
> (vulcan_branch_cost): Likewise.
> (vulcan_tunings): Likewise.


>
> +  {
> +/* FP SFmode */
> +{
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (16),/* Div.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult_addsub. */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Fma.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Addsub.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Fpconst. */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Neg.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Compare.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Widen.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Narrow.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Toint.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Fromint.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7)  /* Roundint.  */
> +},
> +/* FP DFmode */
> +{
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (23),/* Div.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Mult_addsub.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Fma.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (6), /* Addsub.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Fpconst.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Neg.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Compare.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Widen.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Narrow.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Toint.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7), /* Fromint.  */
> +  COSTS_N_INSNS (7)  /* Roundint.  */
> +}

Recently ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00251.html ,
 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01418.html ), I changed the
Cortex-A57 and Cortex-A53 cost tables to make the cost of a floating-point
operation relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This gave some
code generation benefits, particularly around conditional execution and
generation of constants.

Did you see those patches, and did you consider whether there would be a
benefit to doing the same for Vulcan?

Thanks,
James

[PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

2016-06-23 Thread Virendra Pathak

Hi gcc-patches group,

Please find the patch for adding rtx_costs routine for vulcan cpu.

Tested with compiling cross aarch64-linux-gcc , bootstrapped native
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
and make check (gcc). No new regression failure is added by this patch.

Kindly review and merge the patch to trunk, if the patch is okay.
Thanks.


gcc/ChangeLog:

Virendra Pathak  <virendra.pat...@broadcom.com>

* config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Update vulcan COSTS.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
(vulcan_extra_costs): New variable.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c
(vulcan_addrcost_table): Likewise.
(vulcan_regmove_cost): Likewise.
(vulcan_vector_cost): Likewise.
(vulcan_branch_cost): Likewise.
(vulcan_tunings): Likewise.




with regards,
Virendra Pathak
From 602d25a25b69b7615e52b03bbaa28919a08b6bd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Virendra Pathak <virendra.pat...@broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 01:44:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] AArch64: Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

---
 gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def |   2 +-
 gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h | 102 +++
 gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c |  75 +++
 3 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def 
b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def
index ced8f94..f29d25a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ AARCH64_CORE("xgene1",  xgene1,xgene1,8A,  
AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8, xge
 
 /* V8.1 Architecture Processors.  */
 
-AARCH64_CORE("vulcan",  vulcan, cortexa57, 8_1A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8_1 | 
AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO, cortexa57, "0x42", "0x516")
+AARCH64_CORE("vulcan",  vulcan, cortexa57, 8_1A,  AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH8_1 | 
AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO, vulcan, "0x42", "0x516")
 
 /* V8 big.LITTLE implementations.  */
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h 
b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
index 3a3f519..12ad52e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cost-tables.h
@@ -127,6 +127,108 @@ const struct cpu_cost_table thunderx_extra_costs =
   }
 };
 
+const struct cpu_cost_table vulcan_extra_costs =
+{
+  /* ALU */
+  {
+0, /* Arith.  */
+0, /* Logical.  */
+0, /* Shift.  */
+0, /* Shift_reg.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (1), /* Arith_shift.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (1), /* Arith_shift_reg.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (1), /* Log_shift.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (1), /* Log_shift_reg.  */
+0, /* Extend.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (1), /* Extend_arith.  */
+0, /* Bfi.  */
+0, /* Bfx.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (3), /* Clz.  */
+0, /* Rev.  */
+0, /* Non_exec.  */
+true   /* Non_exec_costs_exec.  */
+  },
+  {
+/* MULT SImode */
+{
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (4),   /* Simple.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (4),   /* Flag_setting.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (4),   /* Extend.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (5),   /* Add.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (5),   /* Extend_add.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (18)   /* Idiv.  */
+},
+/* MULT DImode */
+{
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (4),   /* Simple.  */
+  0,   /* Flag_setting.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (4),   /* Extend.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (5),   /* Add.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (5),   /* Extend_add.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (26)   /* Idiv.  */
+}
+  },
+  /* LD/ST */
+  {
+COSTS_N_INSNS (4), /* Load.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (4), /* Load_sign_extend.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (5), /* Ldrd.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (4), /* Ldm_1st.  */
+1, /* Ldm_regs_per_insn_1st.  */
+1, /* Ldm_regs_per_insn_subsequent.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (4), /* Loadf.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (4), /* Loadd.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (4), /* Load_unaligned.  */
+0, /* Store.  */
+0, /* Strd.  */
+0, /* Stm_1st.  */
+1, /* Stm_regs_per_insn_1st.  */
+1, /* Stm_regs_per_insn_subsequent.  */
+0, /* Storef.  */
+0, /* Stored.  */
+0, /* Store_unaligned.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (1), /* Loadv.  */
+COSTS_N_INSNS (1)  /* Storev.  */
+  },
+  {
+/* FP SFmode */
+{
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (16),  /* Div.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (6),   /* Mult.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (6),   /* Mult_addsub. */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (6),   /* Fma.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (6),   /* Addsub.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (5),   /* Fpconst. */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (5),   /* Neg.  */
+  COSTS_N_INSNS (5),   /* Compare.  */
+

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

Re: [PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

[PATCH/AARCH64] Add rtx_costs routine for vulcan.

8 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information