[PATCH] Don't ICE on invalid weak decl (PR middle-end/67330)

2015-08-25 Thread Marek Polacek
Here we are ICEing on an invalid code: symtab_node::get asserts that it's
dealing with a function or a static or external variable, but an invalid
decl is rejected too late.  So don't try to mark_weak an invalid decl and
also don't duplicate the declared weak after being used check -- that is
already in mark_weak.
Perhaps we should also punt if (!TARGET_SUPPORTS_WEAK)?

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2015-08-25  Marek Polacek  pola...@redhat.com

PR middle-end/67330
* varasm.c (declare_weak): Return after giving an error.

* c-common.c (handle_weak_attribute): Don't check whether the
visibility can be changed here.

* gcc.dg/weak/weak-18.c: New test.

diff --git gcc/c-family/c-common.c gcc/c-family/c-common.c
index ff502e5..7691035 100644
--- gcc/c-family/c-common.c
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.c
@@ -8328,12 +8328,7 @@ handle_weak_attribute (tree *node, tree name,
   return NULL_TREE;
 }
   else if (VAR_OR_FUNCTION_DECL_P (*node))
-{
-  struct symtab_node *n = symtab_node::get (*node);
-  if (n  n-refuse_visibility_changes)
-   error (%+D declared weak after being used, *node);
-  declare_weak (*node);
-}
+declare_weak (*node);
   else
 warning (OPT_Wattributes, %qE attribute ignored, name);
 
diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-18.c 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-18.c
index e69de29..ebeb4d5 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-18.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/weak/weak-18.c
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+/* PR middle-end/67330 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-weak  } */
+
+void
+f (void)
+{
+  __attribute__ ((weak)) int a; /* { dg-error weak declaration of .a. must be 
public } */
+}
diff --git gcc/varasm.c gcc/varasm.c
index 7fa2e7b..d9290a1 100644
--- gcc/varasm.c
+++ gcc/varasm.c
@@ -5403,7 +5403,10 @@ declare_weak (tree decl)
 {
   gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (decl) != FUNCTION_DECL || !TREE_ASM_WRITTEN (decl));
   if (! TREE_PUBLIC (decl))
-error (weak declaration of %q+D must be public, decl);
+{
+  error (weak declaration of %q+D must be public, decl);
+  return;
+}
   else if (!TARGET_SUPPORTS_WEAK)
 warning (0, weak declaration of %q+D not supported, decl);
 

Marek


Re: [PATCH] Don't ICE on invalid weak decl (PR middle-end/67330)

2015-08-25 Thread Jeff Law

On 08/25/2015 09:44 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:

Here we are ICEing on an invalid code: symtab_node::get asserts that it's
dealing with a function or a static or external variable, but an invalid
decl is rejected too late.  So don't try to mark_weak an invalid decl and
also don't duplicate the declared weak after being used check -- that is
already in mark_weak.
Perhaps we should also punt if (!TARGET_SUPPORTS_WEAK)?

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2015-08-25  Marek Polacek  pola...@redhat.com

PR middle-end/67330
* varasm.c (declare_weak): Return after giving an error.

* c-common.c (handle_weak_attribute): Don't check whether the
visibility can be changed here.

* gcc.dg/weak/weak-18.c: New test.

OK.
jeff