Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 106560: Another ICE after conflicting types of redeclaration

2022-11-20 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 2:26 AM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
 wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Pinski 
>
> This another one of these ICE after error issues with the
> gimplifier and a fallout from r12-3278-g823685221de986af.
> The problem here is gimplify_modify_expr does not
> check if either from or to was an error operand.
> This adds the check and fixes the ICE.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.

OK.

> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * gimplify.cc (gimplify_modify_expr): If
> either *from_p or *to_p were error_operand
> return early.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/redecl-23.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/redecl-24.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/redecl-25.c: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/gimplify.cc  | 3 +++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c | 6 ++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c | 6 ++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c | 9 +
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.cc b/gcc/gimplify.cc
> index c62a966e918..02415cb1b5c 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimplify.cc
> +++ b/gcc/gimplify.cc
> @@ -6054,6 +6054,9 @@ gimplify_modify_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p, 
> gimple_seq *post_p,
>location_t loc = EXPR_LOCATION (*expr_p);
>gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
>
> +  if (error_operand_p (*from_p) || error_operand_p (*to_p))
> +return GS_ERROR;
> +
>gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (*expr_p) == MODIFY_EXPR
>   || TREE_CODE (*expr_p) == INIT_EXPR);
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..425721df2ff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 106560. */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-w" } */
> +void **a; /* { dg-note "" } */
> +void b() { void **c = a; }
> +a; /* { dg-error "" } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..f0f7a723ab8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 106560 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-w" } */
> +void **a, **b; /* { dg-note "" } */
> +c(){b = a;}
> +a = /* { dg-error "" } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..4232e19d9a7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 106560 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-w" } */
> +void **a; /* { dg-note "" } */
> +void b() {
> +  void **c;
> +c = a /* { dg-error "" } */
> +}
> +a; /* { dg-error "" } */
> --
> 2.27.0
>


[PATCH] Fix PR 106560: Another ICE after conflicting types of redeclaration

2022-11-19 Thread apinski--- via Gcc-patches
From: Andrew Pinski 

This another one of these ICE after error issues with the
gimplifier and a fallout from r12-3278-g823685221de986af.
The problem here is gimplify_modify_expr does not
check if either from or to was an error operand.
This adds the check and fixes the ICE.

OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.

gcc/ChangeLog:

* gimplify.cc (gimplify_modify_expr): If
either *from_p or *to_p were error_operand
return early.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gcc.dg/redecl-23.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/redecl-24.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/redecl-25.c: New test.
---
 gcc/gimplify.cc  | 3 +++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c | 6 ++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c | 6 ++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c | 9 +
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c

diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.cc b/gcc/gimplify.cc
index c62a966e918..02415cb1b5c 100644
--- a/gcc/gimplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.cc
@@ -6054,6 +6054,9 @@ gimplify_modify_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p, 
gimple_seq *post_p,
   location_t loc = EXPR_LOCATION (*expr_p);
   gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
 
+  if (error_operand_p (*from_p) || error_operand_p (*to_p))
+return GS_ERROR;
+
   gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (*expr_p) == MODIFY_EXPR
  || TREE_CODE (*expr_p) == INIT_EXPR);
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..425721df2ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-23.c
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 106560. */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-w" } */
+void **a; /* { dg-note "" } */
+void b() { void **c = a; }
+a; /* { dg-error "" } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..f0f7a723ab8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-24.c
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 106560 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-w" } */
+void **a, **b; /* { dg-note "" } */
+c(){b = a;}  
+a = /* { dg-error "" } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..4232e19d9a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/redecl-25.c
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 106560 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-w" } */
+void **a; /* { dg-note "" } */
+void b() {
+  void **c; 
+c = a /* { dg-error "" } */
+}
+a; /* { dg-error "" } */
-- 
2.27.0