With the changes in r250911 to canonicalize attribute names (i.e. remove
leading and trailing underscores if present) a comment for "handler" in
the attribute_spec struct needs to be updated to reflect that the NAME argument
is now stripped of any underscores.
Patch is attached.
If the patch is acceptable, I would appreciate if someone would commit it for
me, as I don't have write access.
>From 386f8e6aadf5627fcba0955a8dbb6abcec69b1a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jozef Lawrynowicz
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 13:04:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update comment about the format of attribute name in
attribute_spec handler
2018-05-28 Jozef Lawrynowicz
* gcc/tree-core.h: Update comment about the format of NAME string
passed to handler in attribute_spec.
---
gcc/tree-core.h | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-core.h b/gcc/tree-core.h
index 478c631..f7be51f 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-core.h
+++ b/gcc/tree-core.h
@@ -1942,14 +1942,14 @@ struct attribute_spec {
bool affects_type_identity;
/* Function to handle this attribute. NODE points to the node to which
the attribute is to be applied. If a DECL, it should be modified in
- place; if a TYPE, a copy should be created. NAME is the name of the
- attribute (possibly with leading or trailing __). ARGS is the TREE_LIST
- of the arguments (which may be NULL). FLAGS gives further information
- about the context of the attribute. Afterwards, the attributes will
- be added to the DECL_ATTRIBUTES or TYPE_ATTRIBUTES, as appropriate,
- unless *NO_ADD_ATTRS is set to true (which should be done on error,
- as well as in any other cases when the attributes should not be added
- to the DECL or TYPE). Depending on FLAGS, any attributes to be
+ place; if a TYPE, a copy should be created. NAME is the canonicalized
+ name of the attribute i.e. without any leading or trailing underscores.
+ ARGS is the TREE_LIST of the arguments (which may be NULL). FLAGS gives
+ further information about the context of the attribute. Afterwards, the
+ attributes will be added to the DECL_ATTRIBUTES or TYPE_ATTRIBUTES, as
+ appropriate, unless *NO_ADD_ATTRS is set to true (which should be done on
+ error, as well as in any other cases when the attributes should not be
+ added to the DECL or TYPE). Depending on FLAGS, any attributes to be
applied to another type or DECL later may be returned;
otherwise the return value should be NULL_TREE. This pointer may be
NULL if no special handling is required beyond the checks implied
--
2.7.4