Re: [PATCH] Using gen_int_mode instead of GEN_INT to avoid ICE caused by type promotion.

2020-08-21 Thread Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:44 PM Richard Sandiford
 wrote:
>
> Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches  writes:
> > ping ^ 4, it's a very simple fix for ICE.
>
> OK, thanks.  (Reviewing on the basis that I agree it's a simple rtx
> correctness fix.)
>

Thanks for the review.

> Richard
>
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 6:00 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> >>
> >> Ping^3
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > ping ^2
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:31 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > ping
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:57 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >   Bootstrap is ok, regression test is ok for i386 backend.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > gcc/
> >> > > > PR target/96262
> >> > > > * config/i386/i386-expand.c
> >> > > > (ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant): Refine.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > gcc/testsuite/
> >> > > > * gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c: New test.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > >  gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c |  6 +++---
> >> > > >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c | 11 +++
> >> > > >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> > > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> >> > > >
> >> > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c 
> >> > > > b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> >> > > > index e194214804b..d57d043106a 100644
> >> > > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> >> > > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> >> > > > @@ -19537,7 +19537,7 @@ bool
> >> > > >  ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum rtx_code code, rtx dest,
> >> > > > rtx op1, rtx op2)
> >> > > >  {
> >> > > >machine_mode qimode, himode;
> >> > > > -  unsigned int and_constant, xor_constant;
> >> > > > +  HOST_WIDE_INT and_constant, xor_constant;
> >> > > >HOST_WIDE_INT shift_amount;
> >> > > >rtx vec_const_and, vec_const_xor;
> >> > > >rtx tmp, op1_subreg;
> >> > > > @@ -19612,7 +19612,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> >> > > > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
> >> > > >emit_move_insn (dest, simplify_gen_subreg (qimode, tmp, himode, 
> >> > > > 0));
> >> > > >emit_move_insn (vec_const_and,
> >> > > >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> >> > > > -  GEN_INT (and_constant)));
> >> > > > +  gen_int_mode 
> >> > > > (and_constant,
> >> > > > QImode)));
> >> > > >emit_insn (gen_and (dest, dest, vec_const_and));
> >> > > >
> >> > > >/* For ASHIFTRT, perform extra operation like
> >> > > > @@ -19623,7 +19623,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> >> > > > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
> >> > > >vec_const_xor = gen_reg_rtx (qimode);
> >> > > >emit_move_insn (vec_const_xor,
> >> > > >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> >> > > > -  GEN_INT 
> >> > > > (xor_constant)));
> >> > > > +  gen_int_mode
> >> > > > (xor_constant, QImode)));
> >> > > >emit_insn (gen_xor (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
> >> > > >emit_insn (gen_sub (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
> >> > > >  }
> >> > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> >> > > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> >> > > > new file mode 100644
> >> > > > index 000..1825388072e
> >> > > > --- /dev/null
> >> > > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> >> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> >> > > > +/* PR target/96262 */
> >> > > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> >> > > > +/* { dg-options "-mavx512bw -O" } */
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > +typedef char __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (64))) V;
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > +V
> >> > > > +foo (V v)
> >> > > > +{
> >> > > > +  return ~(v << 1);
> >> > > > +}
> >> > > > --
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > BR,
> >> > > > Hongtao
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > BR,
> >> > > Hongtao
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > BR,
> >> > Hongtao
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> BR,
> >> Hongtao



-- 
BR,
Hongtao


Re: [PATCH] Using gen_int_mode instead of GEN_INT to avoid ICE caused by type promotion.

2020-08-21 Thread Richard Sandiford
Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches  writes:
> ping ^ 4, it's a very simple fix for ICE.

OK, thanks.  (Reviewing on the basis that I agree it's a simple rtx
correctness fix.)

Richard

>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 6:00 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
>>
>> Ping^3
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
>> >
>> > ping ^2
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:31 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > ping
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:57 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >   Bootstrap is ok, regression test is ok for i386 backend.
>> > > >
>> > > > gcc/
>> > > > PR target/96262
>> > > > * config/i386/i386-expand.c
>> > > > (ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant): Refine.
>> > > >
>> > > > gcc/testsuite/
>> > > > * gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c: New test.
>> > > >
>> > > > ---
>> > > >  gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c |  6 +++---
>> > > >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c | 11 +++
>> > > >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> > > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
>> > > >
>> > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c 
>> > > > b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
>> > > > index e194214804b..d57d043106a 100644
>> > > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
>> > > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
>> > > > @@ -19537,7 +19537,7 @@ bool
>> > > >  ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum rtx_code code, rtx dest,
>> > > > rtx op1, rtx op2)
>> > > >  {
>> > > >machine_mode qimode, himode;
>> > > > -  unsigned int and_constant, xor_constant;
>> > > > +  HOST_WIDE_INT and_constant, xor_constant;
>> > > >HOST_WIDE_INT shift_amount;
>> > > >rtx vec_const_and, vec_const_xor;
>> > > >rtx tmp, op1_subreg;
>> > > > @@ -19612,7 +19612,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
>> > > > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
>> > > >emit_move_insn (dest, simplify_gen_subreg (qimode, tmp, himode, 0));
>> > > >emit_move_insn (vec_const_and,
>> > > >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
>> > > > -  GEN_INT (and_constant)));
>> > > > +  gen_int_mode (and_constant,
>> > > > QImode)));
>> > > >emit_insn (gen_and (dest, dest, vec_const_and));
>> > > >
>> > > >/* For ASHIFTRT, perform extra operation like
>> > > > @@ -19623,7 +19623,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
>> > > > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
>> > > >vec_const_xor = gen_reg_rtx (qimode);
>> > > >emit_move_insn (vec_const_xor,
>> > > >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
>> > > > -  GEN_INT 
>> > > > (xor_constant)));
>> > > > +  gen_int_mode
>> > > > (xor_constant, QImode)));
>> > > >emit_insn (gen_xor (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
>> > > >emit_insn (gen_sub (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
>> > > >  }
>> > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
>> > > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
>> > > > new file mode 100644
>> > > > index 000..1825388072e
>> > > > --- /dev/null
>> > > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
>> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>> > > > +/* PR target/96262 */
>> > > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> > > > +/* { dg-options "-mavx512bw -O" } */
>> > > > +
>> > > > +typedef char __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (64))) V;
>> > > > +
>> > > > +V
>> > > > +foo (V v)
>> > > > +{
>> > > > +  return ~(v << 1);
>> > > > +}
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > BR,
>> > > > Hongtao
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > BR,
>> > > Hongtao
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > BR,
>> > Hongtao
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> BR,
>> Hongtao


Re: [PATCH] Using gen_int_mode instead of GEN_INT to avoid ICE caused by type promotion.

2020-08-19 Thread Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
ping ^ 4, it's a very simple fix for ICE.

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 6:00 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
>
> Ping^3
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> >
> > ping ^2
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:31 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> > >
> > > ping
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:57 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   Bootstrap is ok, regression test is ok for i386 backend.
> > > >
> > > > gcc/
> > > > PR target/96262
> > > > * config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > > > (ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant): Refine.
> > > >
> > > > gcc/testsuite/
> > > > * gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c: New test.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >  gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c |  6 +++---
> > > >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c | 11 +++
> > > >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c 
> > > > b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > > > index e194214804b..d57d043106a 100644
> > > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > > > @@ -19537,7 +19537,7 @@ bool
> > > >  ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum rtx_code code, rtx dest,
> > > > rtx op1, rtx op2)
> > > >  {
> > > >machine_mode qimode, himode;
> > > > -  unsigned int and_constant, xor_constant;
> > > > +  HOST_WIDE_INT and_constant, xor_constant;
> > > >HOST_WIDE_INT shift_amount;
> > > >rtx vec_const_and, vec_const_xor;
> > > >rtx tmp, op1_subreg;
> > > > @@ -19612,7 +19612,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> > > > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
> > > >emit_move_insn (dest, simplify_gen_subreg (qimode, tmp, himode, 0));
> > > >emit_move_insn (vec_const_and,
> > > >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> > > > -  GEN_INT (and_constant)));
> > > > +  gen_int_mode (and_constant,
> > > > QImode)));
> > > >emit_insn (gen_and (dest, dest, vec_const_and));
> > > >
> > > >/* For ASHIFTRT, perform extra operation like
> > > > @@ -19623,7 +19623,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> > > > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
> > > >vec_const_xor = gen_reg_rtx (qimode);
> > > >emit_move_insn (vec_const_xor,
> > > >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> > > > -  GEN_INT (xor_constant)));
> > > > +  gen_int_mode
> > > > (xor_constant, QImode)));
> > > >emit_insn (gen_xor (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
> > > >emit_insn (gen_sub (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
> > > >  }
> > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000..1825388072e
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > > > +/* PR target/96262 */
> > > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > > > +/* { dg-options "-mavx512bw -O" } */
> > > > +
> > > > +typedef char __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (64))) V;
> > > > +
> > > > +V
> > > > +foo (V v)
> > > > +{
> > > > +  return ~(v << 1);
> > > > +}
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > BR,
> > > > Hongtao
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > BR,
> > > Hongtao
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > BR,
> > Hongtao
>
>
>
> --
> BR,
> Hongtao



-- 
BR,
Hongtao


Re: [PATCH] Using gen_int_mode instead of GEN_INT to avoid ICE caused by type promotion.

2020-08-10 Thread Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
Ping^3

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
>
> ping ^2
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:31 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> >
> > ping
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:57 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> > >
> > >   Bootstrap is ok, regression test is ok for i386 backend.
> > >
> > > gcc/
> > > PR target/96262
> > > * config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > > (ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant): Refine.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/
> > > * gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c: New test.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c |  6 +++---
> > >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c | 11 +++
> > >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > > index e194214804b..d57d043106a 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > > @@ -19537,7 +19537,7 @@ bool
> > >  ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum rtx_code code, rtx dest,
> > > rtx op1, rtx op2)
> > >  {
> > >machine_mode qimode, himode;
> > > -  unsigned int and_constant, xor_constant;
> > > +  HOST_WIDE_INT and_constant, xor_constant;
> > >HOST_WIDE_INT shift_amount;
> > >rtx vec_const_and, vec_const_xor;
> > >rtx tmp, op1_subreg;
> > > @@ -19612,7 +19612,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> > > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
> > >emit_move_insn (dest, simplify_gen_subreg (qimode, tmp, himode, 0));
> > >emit_move_insn (vec_const_and,
> > >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> > > -  GEN_INT (and_constant)));
> > > +  gen_int_mode (and_constant,
> > > QImode)));
> > >emit_insn (gen_and (dest, dest, vec_const_and));
> > >
> > >/* For ASHIFTRT, perform extra operation like
> > > @@ -19623,7 +19623,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> > > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
> > >vec_const_xor = gen_reg_rtx (qimode);
> > >emit_move_insn (vec_const_xor,
> > >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> > > -  GEN_INT (xor_constant)));
> > > +  gen_int_mode
> > > (xor_constant, QImode)));
> > >emit_insn (gen_xor (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
> > >emit_insn (gen_sub (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
> > >  }
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000..1825388072e
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > > +/* PR target/96262 */
> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-mavx512bw -O" } */
> > > +
> > > +typedef char __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (64))) V;
> > > +
> > > +V
> > > +foo (V v)
> > > +{
> > > +  return ~(v << 1);
> > > +}
> > > --
> > >
> > > --
> > > BR,
> > > Hongtao
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > BR,
> > Hongtao
>
>
>
> --
> BR,
> Hongtao



-- 
BR,
Hongtao


Re: [PATCH] Using gen_int_mode instead of GEN_INT to avoid ICE caused by type promotion.

2020-08-04 Thread Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
ping ^2

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:31 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
>
> ping
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:57 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
> >
> >   Bootstrap is ok, regression test is ok for i386 backend.
> >
> > gcc/
> > PR target/96262
> > * config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > (ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant): Refine.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> > * gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c: New test.
> >
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c |  6 +++---
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c | 11 +++
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > index e194214804b..d57d043106a 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> > @@ -19537,7 +19537,7 @@ bool
> >  ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum rtx_code code, rtx dest,
> > rtx op1, rtx op2)
> >  {
> >machine_mode qimode, himode;
> > -  unsigned int and_constant, xor_constant;
> > +  HOST_WIDE_INT and_constant, xor_constant;
> >HOST_WIDE_INT shift_amount;
> >rtx vec_const_and, vec_const_xor;
> >rtx tmp, op1_subreg;
> > @@ -19612,7 +19612,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
> >emit_move_insn (dest, simplify_gen_subreg (qimode, tmp, himode, 0));
> >emit_move_insn (vec_const_and,
> >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> > -  GEN_INT (and_constant)));
> > +  gen_int_mode (and_constant,
> > QImode)));
> >emit_insn (gen_and (dest, dest, vec_const_and));
> >
> >/* For ASHIFTRT, perform extra operation like
> > @@ -19623,7 +19623,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> > rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
> >vec_const_xor = gen_reg_rtx (qimode);
> >emit_move_insn (vec_const_xor,
> >   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> > -  GEN_INT (xor_constant)));
> > +  gen_int_mode
> > (xor_constant, QImode)));
> >emit_insn (gen_xor (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
> >emit_insn (gen_sub (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
> >  }
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..1825388072e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > +/* PR target/96262 */
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-mavx512bw -O" } */
> > +
> > +typedef char __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (64))) V;
> > +
> > +V
> > +foo (V v)
> > +{
> > +  return ~(v << 1);
> > +}
> > --
> >
> > --
> > BR,
> > Hongtao
>
>
>
> --
> BR,
> Hongtao



-- 
BR,
Hongtao


Re: [PATCH] Using gen_int_mode instead of GEN_INT to avoid ICE caused by type promotion.

2020-07-27 Thread Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
ping

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:57 PM Hongtao Liu  wrote:
>
>   Bootstrap is ok, regression test is ok for i386 backend.
>
> gcc/
> PR target/96262
> * config/i386/i386-expand.c
> (ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant): Refine.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c: New test.
>
> ---
>  gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c |  6 +++---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c | 11 +++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> index e194214804b..d57d043106a 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
> @@ -19537,7 +19537,7 @@ bool
>  ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum rtx_code code, rtx dest,
> rtx op1, rtx op2)
>  {
>machine_mode qimode, himode;
> -  unsigned int and_constant, xor_constant;
> +  HOST_WIDE_INT and_constant, xor_constant;
>HOST_WIDE_INT shift_amount;
>rtx vec_const_and, vec_const_xor;
>rtx tmp, op1_subreg;
> @@ -19612,7 +19612,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
>emit_move_insn (dest, simplify_gen_subreg (qimode, tmp, himode, 0));
>emit_move_insn (vec_const_and,
>   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> -  GEN_INT (and_constant)));
> +  gen_int_mode (and_constant,
> QImode)));
>emit_insn (gen_and (dest, dest, vec_const_and));
>
>/* For ASHIFTRT, perform extra operation like
> @@ -19623,7 +19623,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
> rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
>vec_const_xor = gen_reg_rtx (qimode);
>emit_move_insn (vec_const_xor,
>   ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
> -  GEN_INT (xor_constant)));
> +  gen_int_mode
> (xor_constant, QImode)));
>emit_insn (gen_xor (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
>emit_insn (gen_sub (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..1825388072e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* PR target/96262 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mavx512bw -O" } */
> +
> +typedef char __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (64))) V;
> +
> +V
> +foo (V v)
> +{
> +  return ~(v << 1);
> +}
> --
>
> --
> BR,
> Hongtao



-- 
BR,
Hongtao


[PATCH] Using gen_int_mode instead of GEN_INT to avoid ICE caused by type promotion.

2020-07-22 Thread Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
  Bootstrap is ok, regression test is ok for i386 backend.

gcc/
PR target/96262
* config/i386/i386-expand.c
(ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant): Refine.

gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c: New test.

---
 gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c |  6 +++---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c | 11 +++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
index e194214804b..d57d043106a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
@@ -19537,7 +19537,7 @@ bool
 ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum rtx_code code, rtx dest,
rtx op1, rtx op2)
 {
   machine_mode qimode, himode;
-  unsigned int and_constant, xor_constant;
+  HOST_WIDE_INT and_constant, xor_constant;
   HOST_WIDE_INT shift_amount;
   rtx vec_const_and, vec_const_xor;
   rtx tmp, op1_subreg;
@@ -19612,7 +19612,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
   emit_move_insn (dest, simplify_gen_subreg (qimode, tmp, himode, 0));
   emit_move_insn (vec_const_and,
  ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
-  GEN_INT (and_constant)));
+  gen_int_mode (and_constant,
QImode)));
   emit_insn (gen_and (dest, dest, vec_const_and));

   /* For ASHIFTRT, perform extra operation like
@@ -19623,7 +19623,7 @@ ix86_expand_vec_shift_qihi_constant (enum
rtx_code code, rtx dest, rtx op1, rtx
   vec_const_xor = gen_reg_rtx (qimode);
   emit_move_insn (vec_const_xor,
  ix86_build_const_vector (qimode, true,
-  GEN_INT (xor_constant)));
+  gen_int_mode
(xor_constant, QImode)));
   emit_insn (gen_xor (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
   emit_insn (gen_sub (dest, dest, vec_const_xor));
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..1825388072e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr96262-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* PR target/96262 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-mavx512bw -O" } */
+
+typedef char __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (64))) V;
+
+V
+foo (V v)
+{
+  return ~(v << 1);
+}
-- 

-- 
BR,
Hongtao