Re: [PATCH] arm: Extend the PR94780 fix to arm

2020-04-29 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:30 AM Richard Sandiford
 wrote:
>
> Essentially the same fix as for x86.
>
> Tested on arm-linux-gnueabihf and armeb-eabi.  Bordering on the obvious
> I guess, but OK to install?
>
> Richard
>

Ok.

Ramana

>
> 2020-04-29  Richard Sandiford  
>
> gcc/
> * config/arm/arm-builtins.c (arm_atomic_assign_expand_fenv): Use
> TARGET_EXPR instead of MODIFY_EXPR for the first assignments to
> fenv_var and new_fenv_var.
> ---
>  gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c | 9 +
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
> index aee3fd6e2ff..f64742e6447 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
> @@ -4167,8 +4167,9 @@ arm_atomic_assign_expand_fenv (tree *hold, tree *clear, 
> tree *update)
>mask = build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node,
> ~((ARM_FE_ALL_EXCEPT << ARM_FE_EXCEPT_SHIFT)
>   | ARM_FE_ALL_EXCEPT));
> -  ld_fenv = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, unsigned_type_node,
> -   fenv_var, build_call_expr (get_fpscr, 0));
> +  ld_fenv = build4 (TARGET_EXPR, unsigned_type_node,
> +   fenv_var, build_call_expr (get_fpscr, 0),
> +   NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
>masked_fenv = build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, fenv_var, mask);
>hold_fnclex = build_call_expr (set_fpscr, 1, masked_fenv);
>*hold = build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, void_type_node,
> @@ -4189,8 +4190,8 @@ arm_atomic_assign_expand_fenv (tree *hold, tree *clear, 
> tree *update)
> __atomic_feraiseexcept (new_fenv_var);  */
>
>new_fenv_var = create_tmp_var_raw (unsigned_type_node);
> -  reload_fenv = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, new_fenv_var,
> -   build_call_expr (get_fpscr, 0));
> +  reload_fenv = build4 (TARGET_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, new_fenv_var,
> +   build_call_expr (get_fpscr, 0), NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
>restore_fnenv = build_call_expr (set_fpscr, 1, fenv_var);
>atomic_feraiseexcept = builtin_decl_implicit 
> (BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_FERAISEEXCEPT);
>update_call = build_call_expr (atomic_feraiseexcept, 1,


[PATCH] arm: Extend the PR94780 fix to arm

2020-04-29 Thread Richard Sandiford
Essentially the same fix as for x86.

Tested on arm-linux-gnueabihf and armeb-eabi.  Bordering on the obvious
I guess, but OK to install?

Richard


2020-04-29  Richard Sandiford  

gcc/
* config/arm/arm-builtins.c (arm_atomic_assign_expand_fenv): Use
TARGET_EXPR instead of MODIFY_EXPR for the first assignments to
fenv_var and new_fenv_var.
---
 gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c | 9 +
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
index aee3fd6e2ff..f64742e6447 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
@@ -4167,8 +4167,9 @@ arm_atomic_assign_expand_fenv (tree *hold, tree *clear, 
tree *update)
   mask = build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node,
~((ARM_FE_ALL_EXCEPT << ARM_FE_EXCEPT_SHIFT)
  | ARM_FE_ALL_EXCEPT));
-  ld_fenv = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, unsigned_type_node,
-   fenv_var, build_call_expr (get_fpscr, 0));
+  ld_fenv = build4 (TARGET_EXPR, unsigned_type_node,
+   fenv_var, build_call_expr (get_fpscr, 0),
+   NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
   masked_fenv = build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, fenv_var, mask);
   hold_fnclex = build_call_expr (set_fpscr, 1, masked_fenv);
   *hold = build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, void_type_node,
@@ -4189,8 +4190,8 @@ arm_atomic_assign_expand_fenv (tree *hold, tree *clear, 
tree *update)
__atomic_feraiseexcept (new_fenv_var);  */
 
   new_fenv_var = create_tmp_var_raw (unsigned_type_node);
-  reload_fenv = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, new_fenv_var,
-   build_call_expr (get_fpscr, 0));
+  reload_fenv = build4 (TARGET_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, new_fenv_var,
+   build_call_expr (get_fpscr, 0), NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
   restore_fnenv = build_call_expr (set_fpscr, 1, fenv_var);
   atomic_feraiseexcept = builtin_decl_implicit (BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_FERAISEEXCEPT);
   update_call = build_call_expr (atomic_feraiseexcept, 1,