Re: [PATCH] c++: constexpr empty subobject confusion [PR110197]

2023-07-26 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches

On 7/26/23 12:57, Patrick Palka wrote:

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk/13 (later)?


OK.


-- >8 --

Now that init_subob_ctx no longer sets new_ctx.ctor for a subobject of
empty type, it seems we need to ensure its callers cxx_eval_bare_aggregate
and cxx_eval_vec_init_1 consistently omit entries for such subobjects in
the parent ctx->ctor.  We also need to allow cxx_eval_array_reference
to synthesize an empty element object even if the array CONSTRUCTOR
has CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING set.

PR c++/110197

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

* constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_array_reference): Return a synthesized
empty subobject even if CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING is set.
(cxx_eval_bare_aggregate): Set 'no_slot' to true more generally
whenever new_ctx.ctor is empty, i.e. for any subobject of empty
type.
(cxx_eval_vec_init_1): Define 'no_slot' as above and use it
accordingly.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/constexpr.cc   | 23 +--
  .../g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C  |  7 ++
  .../g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C  | 12 ++
  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index f2fcb54626d..da2c3116810 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -4297,6 +4297,9 @@ cxx_eval_array_reference (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree 
t,
  
/* Not found.  */
  
+  if (is_really_empty_class (elem_type, /*ignore_vptr*/false))

+return build_constructor (elem_type, NULL);
+
if (TREE_CODE (ary) == CONSTRUCTOR
&& CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING (ary))
  {
@@ -4314,9 +4317,7 @@ cxx_eval_array_reference (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree 
t,
   directly for non-aggregates to avoid creating a garbage CONSTRUCTOR.  */
tree val;
constexpr_ctx new_ctx;
-  if (is_really_empty_class (elem_type, /*ignore_vptr*/false))
-return build_constructor (elem_type, NULL);
-  else if (CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (elem_type))
+  if (CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (elem_type))
  {
tree empty_ctor = build_constructor (init_list_type_node, NULL);
val = digest_init (elem_type, empty_ctor, tf_warning_or_error);
@@ -5095,9 +5096,9 @@ cxx_eval_bare_aggregate (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
FOR_EACH_CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (v, i, index, value)
  {
tree orig_value = value;
-  /* Like in cxx_eval_store_expression, omit entries for empty fields.  */
-  bool no_slot = TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE && is_empty_field (index);
init_subob_ctx (ctx, new_ctx, index, value);
+  /* Like in cxx_eval_store_expression, omit entries for empty fields.  */
+  bool no_slot = new_ctx.ctor == NULL_TREE;
int pos_hint = -1;
if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor && !no_slot)
{
@@ -5261,7 +5262,8 @@ cxx_eval_vec_init_1 (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree 
atype, tree init,
bool reuse = false;
constexpr_ctx new_ctx;
init_subob_ctx (ctx, new_ctx, idx, pre_init ? init : elttype);
-  if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor)
+  bool no_slot = new_ctx.ctor == NULL_TREE;
+  if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor && !no_slot)
{
  if (zeroed_out)
CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING (new_ctx.ctor) = false;
@@ -5306,7 +5308,14 @@ cxx_eval_vec_init_1 (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree 
atype, tree init,
}
if (*non_constant_p)
break;
-  if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor)
+  if (no_slot)
+   {
+ /* This is an initializer for an empty subobject; now that we've
+checked that it's constant, we can ignore it.  */
+ gcc_checking_assert (i == 0);
+ break;
+   }
+  else if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor)
{
  /* We appended this element above; update the value.  */
  gcc_assert ((*p)->last().index == idx);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C
new file mode 100644
index 000..4bb9e3dcb64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// PR c++/110197
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct A { constexpr A(int) { } };
+struct B { A a; };
+constexpr B f(int n) { return B{A{n}}; }
+constexpr B b = f(1);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C
new file mode 100644
index 000..5ad67682c5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/110197
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct A {
+  constexpr A() : A(__builtin_is_constant_evaluated()) { }
+  constexpr A(int) { }
+};
+constexpr 

[PATCH] c++: constexpr empty subobject confusion [PR110197]

2023-07-26 Thread Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk/13 (later)?

-- >8 --

Now that init_subob_ctx no longer sets new_ctx.ctor for a subobject of
empty type, it seems we need to ensure its callers cxx_eval_bare_aggregate
and cxx_eval_vec_init_1 consistently omit entries for such subobjects in
the parent ctx->ctor.  We also need to allow cxx_eval_array_reference
to synthesize an empty element object even if the array CONSTRUCTOR
has CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING set.

PR c++/110197

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

* constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_array_reference): Return a synthesized
empty subobject even if CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING is set.
(cxx_eval_bare_aggregate): Set 'no_slot' to true more generally
whenever new_ctx.ctor is empty, i.e. for any subobject of empty
type.
(cxx_eval_vec_init_1): Define 'no_slot' as above and use it
accordingly.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/constexpr.cc   | 23 +--
 .../g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C  |  7 ++
 .../g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C  | 12 ++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index f2fcb54626d..da2c3116810 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -4297,6 +4297,9 @@ cxx_eval_array_reference (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree 
t,
 
   /* Not found.  */
 
+  if (is_really_empty_class (elem_type, /*ignore_vptr*/false))
+return build_constructor (elem_type, NULL);
+
   if (TREE_CODE (ary) == CONSTRUCTOR
   && CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING (ary))
 {
@@ -4314,9 +4317,7 @@ cxx_eval_array_reference (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree 
t,
  directly for non-aggregates to avoid creating a garbage CONSTRUCTOR.  */
   tree val;
   constexpr_ctx new_ctx;
-  if (is_really_empty_class (elem_type, /*ignore_vptr*/false))
-return build_constructor (elem_type, NULL);
-  else if (CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (elem_type))
+  if (CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (elem_type))
 {
   tree empty_ctor = build_constructor (init_list_type_node, NULL);
   val = digest_init (elem_type, empty_ctor, tf_warning_or_error);
@@ -5095,9 +5096,9 @@ cxx_eval_bare_aggregate (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
   FOR_EACH_CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (v, i, index, value)
 {
   tree orig_value = value;
-  /* Like in cxx_eval_store_expression, omit entries for empty fields.  */
-  bool no_slot = TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE && is_empty_field (index);
   init_subob_ctx (ctx, new_ctx, index, value);
+  /* Like in cxx_eval_store_expression, omit entries for empty fields.  */
+  bool no_slot = new_ctx.ctor == NULL_TREE;
   int pos_hint = -1;
   if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor && !no_slot)
{
@@ -5261,7 +5262,8 @@ cxx_eval_vec_init_1 (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree 
atype, tree init,
   bool reuse = false;
   constexpr_ctx new_ctx;
   init_subob_ctx (ctx, new_ctx, idx, pre_init ? init : elttype);
-  if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor)
+  bool no_slot = new_ctx.ctor == NULL_TREE;
+  if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor && !no_slot)
{
  if (zeroed_out)
CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING (new_ctx.ctor) = false;
@@ -5306,7 +5308,14 @@ cxx_eval_vec_init_1 (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree 
atype, tree init,
}
   if (*non_constant_p)
break;
-  if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor)
+  if (no_slot)
+   {
+ /* This is an initializer for an empty subobject; now that we've
+checked that it's constant, we can ignore it.  */
+ gcc_checking_assert (i == 0);
+ break;
+   }
+  else if (new_ctx.ctor != ctx->ctor)
{
  /* We appended this element above; update the value.  */
  gcc_assert ((*p)->last().index == idx);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C
new file mode 100644
index 000..4bb9e3dcb64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty18.C
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// PR c++/110197
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct A { constexpr A(int) { } };
+struct B { A a; };
+constexpr B f(int n) { return B{A{n}}; }
+constexpr B b = f(1);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C
new file mode 100644
index 000..5ad67682c5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-empty19.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/110197
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct A {
+  constexpr A() : A(__builtin_is_constant_evaluated()) { }
+  constexpr A(int) { }
+};
+constexpr A a1[1] = {{}};
+constexpr A a2[2] = {{}, {}};
+constexpr A a3[3] = {{}, {},