Re: [PATCH] debug/PR78112: remove recent duplicates for DW_TAG_subprogram attributes

[Pierre-Marie de Rodat]

Hi Christophe,

On 11/18/2016 03:03 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:

Hi,

Part of the new testcase added with this commit fails on arm* targets:
  g++.dg/pr78112.C   scan-assembler-times DW_AT_object_pointer 37


Thank you for the report.

As I said on the bugzilla 
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112#c17), I reproduce 
inconsistent results on this even on a very reduced testcase. So I 
wonder if I should just remove this testcase.


--
Pierre-Marie de Rodat

Re: [PATCH] debug/PR78112: remove recent duplicates for DW_TAG_subprogram attributes

[Christophe Lyon]

On 10 November 2016 at 12:06, Pierre-Marie de Rodat  wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 10:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> Using scan-assembler-times on the dwarf?
>
>
> I always have a bad feeling about this kind of check as I imagine it can
> break very easily with legit changes. But I have nothing better to
> contribute, so I’ve added one such testcase. ;-)
>
>>> Ok to commit?
>>
>>
>> Ok.
>
>
> This is committed as r242035. Thanks!
>
Hi,

Part of the new testcase added with this commit fails on arm* targets:
  g++.dg/pr78112.C   scan-assembler-times DW_AT_object_pointer 37

Christophe



> --
> Pierre-Marie de Rodat

Re: [PATCH] debug/PR78112: remove recent duplicates for DW_TAG_subprogram attributes

[Pierre-Marie de Rodat]

On 11/09/2016 10:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:

Using scan-assembler-times on the dwarf?


I always have a bad feeling about this kind of check as I imagine it can 
break very easily with legit changes. But I have nothing better to 
contribute, so I’ve added one such testcase. ;-)



Ok to commit?


Ok.


This is committed as r242035. Thanks!

--
Pierre-Marie de Rodat

Re: [PATCH] debug/PR78112: remove recent duplicates for DW_TAG_subprogram attributes

[Richard Biener]

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat
 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch comes from the discussion for PR debug/78112
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112).  It seems to fix
> the regression Rainer detected on x86_64-apple-darwin, although I still
> wonder why remaining duplicate attributes (which were already present
> before my original patch) are not a problem on this platform.
>
> Anyway, bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux.  As I said on the
> PR, I managed to check with a Python script that there were no
> duplicates anymore but I don't know how to turn this into a DejaGNU
> testcase.

Using scan-assembler-times on the dwarf?

> Ok to commit?

Ok.

Richard.

> gcc/
>
> PR debug/78112
> * dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_early_global_decl): Call dwarf2out_decl
> on the context only when it has no DIE yet.
> ---
>  gcc/dwarf2out.c | 8 
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
> index 1dfff38..f9ec090 100644
> --- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c
> +++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
> @@ -25256,11 +25256,11 @@ dwarf2out_early_global_decl (tree decl)
>   if (!DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl))
> goto early_decl_exit;
>
> - /* For nested functions, emit DIEs for the parents first so that all
> -nested DIEs are generated at the proper scope in the first
> -shot.  */
> + /* For nested functions, make sure we have DIEs for the parents 
> first
> +so that all nested DIEs are generated at the proper scope in the
> +first shot.  */
>   tree context = decl_function_context (decl);
> - if (context != NULL)
> + if (context != NULL && lookup_decl_die (context) == NULL)
> {
>   current_function_decl = context;
>   dwarf2out_decl (context);
> --
> 2.10.2
>

[PATCH] debug/PR78112: remove recent duplicates for DW_TAG_subprogram attributes

[Pierre-Marie de Rodat]

Hello,

This patch comes from the discussion for PR debug/78112
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112).  It seems to fix
the regression Rainer detected on x86_64-apple-darwin, although I still
wonder why remaining duplicate attributes (which were already present
before my original patch) are not a problem on this platform.

Anyway, bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux.  As I said on the
PR, I managed to check with a Python script that there were no
duplicates anymore but I don't know how to turn this into a DejaGNU
testcase.

Ok to commit?

gcc/

PR debug/78112
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_early_global_decl): Call dwarf2out_decl
on the context only when it has no DIE yet.
---
 gcc/dwarf2out.c | 8 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
index 1dfff38..f9ec090 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
@@ -25256,11 +25256,11 @@ dwarf2out_early_global_decl (tree decl)
  if (!DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl))
goto early_decl_exit;
 
- /* For nested functions, emit DIEs for the parents first so that all
-nested DIEs are generated at the proper scope in the first
-shot.  */
+ /* For nested functions, make sure we have DIEs for the parents first
+so that all nested DIEs are generated at the proper scope in the
+first shot.  */
  tree context = decl_function_context (decl);
- if (context != NULL)
+ if (context != NULL && lookup_decl_die (context) == NULL)
{
  current_function_decl = context;
  dwarf2out_decl (context);
-- 
2.10.2