Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
On 30/04/2024 16:37, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote: > > > On 2024-04-30 17:11, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 27/04/2024 15:13, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote: >>> Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to >>> verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0. >>> >>> Test is done using -O0 to ensure the instructions are in a predictable >>> order. >>> >>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >>> >>> * gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON >>> --- >>> .../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c | 20 ++- >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c >>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c >>> index 01fac786238..b8b8ecbff56 100644 >>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c >>> @@ -93,4 +93,22 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char >>> boolSecureFunc (bool index) { >>> return 0; >>> return array[index]; >>> -} >>> \ No newline at end of file >>> +} >>> + >>> +/* >>> +**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc: >>> +** ... >>> +** uxtb r0, r0 >>> +** uxtb r1, r1 >>> +** uxth r2, r2 >>> +** uxtb r3, r3 >>> +** ... >>> +*/ >>> +__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char >>> boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c, >>> enum offset d) { >>> + >>> + size_t index = a + b + c + d; >>> + if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE) >>> + return 0; >>> + return array[index]; >>> + >>> +} >> >> Ok, but please can you add '-fshort-enums' to dg-options to ensure this test >> still behaves correctly if run with a different default (I missed that last >> time around). > > Ok, I'll add that to extend-param.c. Do you want me to also add it to the > extend-return.c test case? > > Kind regards, > Torbjörn Yes please, if it has the same issue. R.
Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
On 2024-04-30 17:11, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 27/04/2024 15:13, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote: Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0. Test is done using -O0 to ensure the instructions are in a predictable order. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON --- .../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c| 20 ++- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c index 01fac786238..b8b8ecbff56 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c @@ -93,4 +93,22 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool index) { return 0; return array[index]; -} \ No newline at end of file +} + +/* +**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc: +** ... +** uxtbr0, r0 +** uxtbr1, r1 +** uxthr2, r2 +** uxtbr3, r3 +** ... +*/ +__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c, enum offset d) { + + size_t index = a + b + c + d; + if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE) +return 0; + return array[index]; + +} Ok, but please can you add '-fshort-enums' to dg-options to ensure this test still behaves correctly if run with a different default (I missed that last time around). Ok, I'll add that to extend-param.c. Do you want me to also add it to the extend-return.c test case? Kind regards, Torbjörn
Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
On 27/04/2024 15:13, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote: > Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to > verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0. > > Test is done using -O0 to ensure the instructions are in a predictable > order. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. > > Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON > --- > .../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c| 20 ++- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c > index 01fac786238..b8b8ecbff56 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c > @@ -93,4 +93,22 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc > (bool index) { > return 0; >return array[index]; > > -} > \ No newline at end of file > +} > + > +/* > +**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc: > +** ... > +** uxtbr0, r0 > +** uxtbr1, r1 > +** uxthr2, r2 > +** uxtbr3, r3 > +** ... > +*/ > +__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char > boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c, enum > offset d) { > + > + size_t index = a + b + c + d; > + if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE) > +return 0; > + return array[index]; > + > +} Ok, but please can you add '-fshort-enums' to dg-options to ensure this test still behaves correctly if run with a different default (I missed that last time around). R.
[PATCH] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0. Test is done using -O0 to ensure the instructions are in a predictable order. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON --- .../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c| 20 ++- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c index 01fac786238..b8b8ecbff56 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c @@ -93,4 +93,22 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool index) { return 0; return array[index]; -} \ No newline at end of file +} + +/* +**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc: +** ... +** uxtbr0, r0 +** uxtbr1, r1 +** uxthr2, r2 +** uxtbr3, r3 +** ... +*/ +__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c, enum offset d) { + + size_t index = a + b + c + d; + if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE) +return 0; + return array[index]; + +} -- 2.25.1