Re: [PATCH 09/10] libiberty: Correctly handle error result in dlang_parse_assocarray()

2019-04-30 Thread Jeff Law
On 1/10/19 5:19 PM, Ben L wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> First time emailing gcc-patches, so I'm sorry if I get any of this wrong or if
> there's obvious errors repeated in my patches. AFAICT I should be sending each
> change individually rather than as one bulk patch, so I'm sorry about the spam
> too.
> 
> All of these changes were found by fuzzing libiberty's demanglers over the
> past week, and I have at least one more that it's currently crashing out on
> but I haven't had time to look into why yet.
> 
> Obviously since this is my first time emailing I don't have write access to
> commit any of these, so if any are approved then I'd be grateful if you can
> commit them too.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ben
> 
> --
> 
> The number of elements were being taken as valid and for each one a separator
> was appended to the output, resulting in a huge memory bloat before crashing
> later on due to a signed integer overflow.
> 
>  * d-demangle.c (dlang_parse_assocarray): Correctly handle error result.
>  * testsuite/d-demangle-expected: Add testcase.
> 
Thanks.  I've installed this on the trunk.
jeff


[PATCH 09/10] libiberty: Correctly handle error result in dlang_parse_assocarray()

2019-01-10 Thread Ben L
Hi all,

First time emailing gcc-patches, so I'm sorry if I get any of this wrong or if
there's obvious errors repeated in my patches. AFAICT I should be sending each
change individually rather than as one bulk patch, so I'm sorry about the spam
too.

All of these changes were found by fuzzing libiberty's demanglers over the
past week, and I have at least one more that it's currently crashing out on
but I haven't had time to look into why yet.

Obviously since this is my first time emailing I don't have write access to
commit any of these, so if any are approved then I'd be grateful if you can
commit them too.

Thanks,
Ben

--

The number of elements were being taken as valid and for each one a separator
was appended to the output, resulting in a huge memory bloat before crashing
later on due to a signed integer overflow.

 * d-demangle.c (dlang_parse_assocarray): Correctly handle error result.
 * testsuite/d-demangle-expected: Add testcase.

From f3dd4107d4bd59b7f3370b17b25c9fd35d499ea3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: bobsayshilol 
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:46:30 +
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] libiberty: Correctly handle error result in
 dlang_parse_assocarray().

The number of elements were being taken as valid and for each one a separator
was appended to the output, resulting in a huge memory bloat before crashing
later on due to a signed integer overflow.

* d-demangle.c (dlang_parse_assocarray): Correctly handle error result.
* testsuite/d-demangle-expected: Add testcase.

diff --git a/libiberty/d-demangle.c b/libiberty/d-demangle.c
index e98118e..becc402 100644
--- a/libiberty/d-demangle.c
+++ b/libiberty/d-demangle.c
@@ -1217,8 +1217,13 @@ dlang_parse_assocarray (string *decl, const char *mangled)
   while (elements--)
 {
   mangled = dlang_value (decl, mangled, NULL, '\0');
+  if (mangled == NULL)
+	return NULL;
+
   string_append (decl, ":");
   mangled = dlang_value (decl, mangled, NULL, '\0');
+  if (mangled == NULL)
+	return NULL;
 
   if (elements != 0)
 	string_append (decl, ", ");
diff --git a/libiberty/testsuite/d-demangle-expected b/libiberty/testsuite/d-demangle-expected
index 44a8d3b..490d4e1 100644
--- a/libiberty/testsuite/d-demangle-expected
+++ b/libiberty/testsuite/d-demangle-expected
@@ -1322,3 +1322,7 @@ _D7__T2fnVlS8S5888S6S5
 --format=dlang
 _D1_B6961*
 _D1_B6961*
+# Could crash
+--format=dlang
+_D5__T1fVHacA66_
+_D5__T1fVHacA66_
-- 
2.20.1