Re: [PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN

2011-05-11 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:19, Richard Guenther
 richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com 
 wrote:
 Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR.  Nothing to
 see here.

 I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this ... like always requiring
 operand 2 of SWITCH_EXPRs.

 Could be, but I think it makes sense to do it in incremental steps.
 This change seems like a step forward in its own sense.  I'm fine with
 it.

Yeah, ok.

Richard.


 Diego.



Re: [PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN

2011-05-11 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com wrote:
 Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR.  Nothing to
 see here.

 -Nathan

 gcc/
        * tree.def (CASE_LABEL_EXPR): Add an operand.
        * tree.h (CASE_CHAIN): Use TREE_OPERAND instead of TREE_CHAIN.


This caused:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965

This failure is kind of random.  We may have some invalid memory access.

-- 
H.J.


Re: [PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN

2011-05-10 Thread Nathan Froyd
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:19:14PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com 
 wrote:
  Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR.  Nothing to
  see here.
 
 I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this ... like always requiring
 operand 2 of SWITCH_EXPRs.

I'm honestly not sure.  Would it be OK to commit the patch and discuss
other options later?  CASE_LABEL is the last expression-esque node using
TREE_CHAIN.

-Nathan


Re: [PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN

2011-03-11 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com wrote:
 Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR.  Nothing to
 see here.

I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this ... like always requiring
operand 2 of SWITCH_EXPRs.

Richard.

 -Nathan

 gcc/
        * tree.def (CASE_LABEL_EXPR): Add an operand.
        * tree.h (CASE_CHAIN): Use TREE_OPERAND instead of TREE_CHAIN.

 diff --git a/gcc/tree.def b/gcc/tree.def
 index eb94ad2..9c6606d 100644
 --- a/gcc/tree.def
 +++ b/gcc/tree.def
 @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ DEFTREECODE (SWITCH_EXPR, switch_expr, tcc_statement, 3)
    CASE_HIGH, respectively. If CASE_LOW is NULL_TREE, the label is a
    'default' label. If CASE_HIGH is NULL_TREE, the label is a normal case
    label.  CASE_LABEL is the corresponding LABEL_DECL.  */
 -DEFTREECODE (CASE_LABEL_EXPR, case_label_expr, tcc_statement, 3)
 +DEFTREECODE (CASE_LABEL_EXPR, case_label_expr, tcc_statement, 4)

  /* Used to represent an inline assembly statement.  ASM_STRING returns a
    STRING_CST for the instruction (e.g., mov x, y). ASM_OUTPUTS,
 diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
 index 3e1ff2c..c81186a 100644
 --- a/gcc/tree.h
 +++ b/gcc/tree.h
 @@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ extern void protected_set_expr_location (tree, 
 location_t);
  #define CASE_LOW(NODE)                 TREE_OPERAND (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
 (NODE), 0)
  #define CASE_HIGH(NODE)                TREE_OPERAND (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
 (NODE), 1)
  #define CASE_LABEL(NODE)               TREE_OPERAND (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
 (NODE), 2)
 -#define CASE_CHAIN(NODE)               TREE_CHAIN (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
 (NODE))
 +#define CASE_CHAIN(NODE)               TREE_OPERAND (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
 (NODE), 3)

  /* The operands of a TARGET_MEM_REF.  Operands 0 and 1 have to match
    corresponding MEM_REF operands.  */
 --
 1.7.0.4




[PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN

2011-03-10 Thread Nathan Froyd
Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR.  Nothing to
see here.

-Nathan

gcc/
* tree.def (CASE_LABEL_EXPR): Add an operand.
* tree.h (CASE_CHAIN): Use TREE_OPERAND instead of TREE_CHAIN.

diff --git a/gcc/tree.def b/gcc/tree.def
index eb94ad2..9c6606d 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.def
+++ b/gcc/tree.def
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ DEFTREECODE (SWITCH_EXPR, switch_expr, tcc_statement, 3)
CASE_HIGH, respectively. If CASE_LOW is NULL_TREE, the label is a
'default' label. If CASE_HIGH is NULL_TREE, the label is a normal case
label.  CASE_LABEL is the corresponding LABEL_DECL.  */
-DEFTREECODE (CASE_LABEL_EXPR, case_label_expr, tcc_statement, 3)
+DEFTREECODE (CASE_LABEL_EXPR, case_label_expr, tcc_statement, 4)
 
 /* Used to represent an inline assembly statement.  ASM_STRING returns a
STRING_CST for the instruction (e.g., mov x, y). ASM_OUTPUTS,
diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
index 3e1ff2c..c81186a 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.h
+++ b/gcc/tree.h
@@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ extern void protected_set_expr_location (tree, 
location_t);
 #define CASE_LOW(NODE) TREE_OPERAND (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
(NODE), 0)
 #define CASE_HIGH(NODE)TREE_OPERAND (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
(NODE), 1)
 #define CASE_LABEL(NODE)   TREE_OPERAND (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
(NODE), 2)
-#define CASE_CHAIN(NODE)   TREE_CHAIN (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
(NODE))
+#define CASE_CHAIN(NODE)   TREE_OPERAND (CASE_LABEL_EXPR_CHECK 
(NODE), 3)
 
 /* The operands of a TARGET_MEM_REF.  Operands 0 and 1 have to match
corresponding MEM_REF operands.  */
-- 
1.7.0.4