Re: [PATCH 3/4] rs6000: build constant via li/lis;rldicl/rldicr

2023-06-12 Thread Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches


Hi,

David Edelsohn  writes:
>  
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:56 PM Jiufu Guo  wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
>  This patch checks if a constant is possible left/right cleaned on a rotated
>  value from a negative value of "li/lis".  If so, we can build the constant
>  through "li/lis ; rldicl/rldicr".
>
>  Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64{,le}.
>  Is this ok for trunk?
>
>  BR,
>  Jeff (Jiufu)
>
>  gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>  * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl): New
>  function.
>  (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr): New function.
>  (rs6000_emit_set_long_const): Call can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr 
> and
>  can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl.
>
> This is okay.  See below.
>
> Thanks, David
>
>  
>  
>  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>  * gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c: Add more tests.
>  ---
>   gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc   | 61 ++-
>   .../gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c  | 44 +
>   2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>  diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
>  index 03cd9d5e952..2a3fa733b45 100644
>  --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
>  +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
>  @@ -10332,6 +10332,61 @@ can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (HOST_WIDE_INT c, 
> int *shift,
> return false;
>   }
>
>  +/* Check if value C can be built by 2 instructions: one is 'li or lis',
>  +   another is rldicl.
>  +
>  +   If so, *SHIFT is set to the shift operand of rldicl, and *MASK is set to
>  +   the mask operand of rldicl, and return true.
>  +   Return false otherwise.  */
>  +
>  +static bool
>  +can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
>  +  HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
>  +{
>  +  /* Leading zeros may be cleaned by rldicl with a mask.  Change leading 
> zeros
>  + to ones and then recheck it.  */
>  +  int lz = clz_hwi (c);
>  +  HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c
>  += c | (HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - lz));
>  +  int n;
>  +  if (can_be_rotated_to_negative_li (unmask_c, &n)
>
> using can_be_rotated_to_lowbits (~unmask_c, 15, &n)
>
> Maybe Segher would want the abstraction, but it seems more wasteful to
> me.

Thanks! I would update accordingly :)

BR,
Jeff (Jiufu) Guo

>  
>  +  || can_be_rotated_to_negative_lis (unmask_c, &n))
>  +{
>  +  *mask = HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U >> lz;
>  +  *shift = n == 0 ? 0 : HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - n;
>  +  return true;
>  +}
>  +
>  +  return false;
>  +}
>  +
>  +/* Check if value C can be built by 2 instructions: one is 'li or lis',
>  +   another is rldicr.
>  +
>  +   If so, *SHIFT is set to the shift operand of rldicr, and *MASK is set to
>  +   the mask operand of rldicr, and return true.
>  +   Return false otherwise.  */
>  +
>  +static bool
>  +can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
>  +  HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
>  +{
>  +  /* Tailing zeros may be cleaned by rldicr with a mask.  Change tailing 
> zeros
>  + to ones and then recheck it.  */
>  +  int tz = ctz_hwi (c);
>  +  HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c = c | ((HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << tz) - 1);
>  +  int n;
>  +  if (can_be_rotated_to_negative_li (unmask_c, &n)
>  +  || can_be_rotated_to_negative_lis (unmask_c, &n))
>  +{
>  +  *mask = HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << tz;
>  +  *shift = HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - n;
>  +  return true;
>  +}
>  +
>  +  return false;
>  +}
>  +
>   /* Subroutine of rs6000_emit_set_const, handling PowerPC64 DImode.
>  Output insns to set DEST equal to the constant C as a series of
>  lis, ori and shl instructions.  */
>  @@ -10378,7 +10433,9 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT 
> c)
> emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_XOR (DImode, temp,
>   GEN_INT ((ud2 ^ 0x) << 16)));
>   }
>  -  else if (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (c, &shift, &mask))
>  +  else if (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (c, &shift, &mask)
>  +  || can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl (c, &shift, &mask)
>  +  || can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr (c, &shift, &mask))
>   {
> temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
> unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT imm = (c | ~mask);
>  @@ -10387,6 +10444,8 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT 
> c)
> emit_move_insn (temp, GEN_INT (imm));
> if (shift != 0)
>  temp = gen_rtx_ROTATE (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (shift));
>  +  if (mask != HOST_WIDE_INT_M1)
>  +   temp = gen_rtx_AND (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (mask));
> emit_move_insn (dest, temp);
>   }
> else if (ud3 == 0 && ud4 == 0)
>  diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
>  index c38a1dd91f2..8c209921d41 100644
>  --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
>  +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.tar

Re: [PATCH 3/4] rs6000: build constant via li/lis;rldicl/rldicr

2023-06-10 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:56 PM Jiufu Guo  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This patch checks if a constant is possible left/right cleaned on a rotated
> value from a negative value of "li/lis".  If so, we can build the constant
> through "li/lis ; rldicl/rldicr".
>
> Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64{,le}.
> Is this ok for trunk?
>
> BR,
> Jeff (Jiufu)
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl): New
> function.
> (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr): New function.
> (rs6000_emit_set_long_const): Call
> can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr and
> can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl.
>

This is okay.  See below.

Thanks, David



>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c: Add more tests.
> ---
>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc   | 61 ++-
>  .../gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c  | 44 +
>  2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> index 03cd9d5e952..2a3fa733b45 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> @@ -10332,6 +10332,61 @@ can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (HOST_WIDE_INT
> c, int *shift,
>return false;
>  }
>
> +/* Check if value C can be built by 2 instructions: one is 'li or lis',
> +   another is rldicl.
> +
> +   If so, *SHIFT is set to the shift operand of rldicl, and *MASK is set
> to
> +   the mask operand of rldicl, and return true.
> +   Return false otherwise.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
> +  HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
> +{
> +  /* Leading zeros may be cleaned by rldicl with a mask.  Change leading
> zeros
> + to ones and then recheck it.  */
> +  int lz = clz_hwi (c);
> +  HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c
> += c | (HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - lz));
> +  int n;
> +  if (can_be_rotated_to_negative_li (unmask_c, &n)
>

using can_be_rotated_to_lowbits (~unmask_c, 15, &n)

Maybe Segher would want the abstraction, but it seems more wasteful to me.


> +  || can_be_rotated_to_negative_lis (unmask_c, &n))
> +{
> +  *mask = HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U >> lz;
> +  *shift = n == 0 ? 0 : HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - n;
> +  return true;
> +}
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Check if value C can be built by 2 instructions: one is 'li or lis',
> +   another is rldicr.
> +
> +   If so, *SHIFT is set to the shift operand of rldicr, and *MASK is set
> to
> +   the mask operand of rldicr, and return true.
> +   Return false otherwise.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
> +  HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
> +{
> +  /* Tailing zeros may be cleaned by rldicr with a mask.  Change tailing
> zeros
> + to ones and then recheck it.  */
> +  int tz = ctz_hwi (c);
> +  HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c = c | ((HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << tz) - 1);
> +  int n;
> +  if (can_be_rotated_to_negative_li (unmask_c, &n)
> +  || can_be_rotated_to_negative_lis (unmask_c, &n))
> +{
> +  *mask = HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << tz;
> +  *shift = HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - n;
> +  return true;
> +}
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
>  /* Subroutine of rs6000_emit_set_const, handling PowerPC64 DImode.
> Output insns to set DEST equal to the constant C as a series of
> lis, ori and shl instructions.  */
> @@ -10378,7 +10433,9 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest,
> HOST_WIDE_INT c)
>emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_XOR (DImode, temp,
>  GEN_INT ((ud2 ^ 0x) << 16)));
>  }
> -  else if (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (c, &shift, &mask))
> +  else if (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (c, &shift, &mask)
> +  || can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl (c, &shift, &mask)
> +  || can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr (c, &shift, &mask))
>  {
>temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
>unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT imm = (c | ~mask);
> @@ -10387,6 +10444,8 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest,
> HOST_WIDE_INT c)
>emit_move_insn (temp, GEN_INT (imm));
>if (shift != 0)
> temp = gen_rtx_ROTATE (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (shift));
> +  if (mask != HOST_WIDE_INT_M1)
> +   temp = gen_rtx_AND (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (mask));
>emit_move_insn (dest, temp);
>  }
>else if (ud3 == 0 && ud4 == 0)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
> index c38a1dd91f2..8c209921d41 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,42 @@ lis_rotldi_6 (void)
>return 0x5318LL;
>  }
>
> +long long NOIPA
> +li_rldicl_7 (void)
> +{
> +  return 0x3ffa1LL;
> +}
> +
> +long long NOIPA
> +li_rldicl_8 (void

[PATCH 3/4] rs6000: build constant via li/lis;rldicl/rldicr

2023-06-07 Thread Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches
Hi,

This patch checks if a constant is possible left/right cleaned on a rotated
value from a negative value of "li/lis".  If so, we can build the constant
through "li/lis ; rldicl/rldicr".

Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64{,le}.
Is this ok for trunk?

BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)

gcc/ChangeLog:

* config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl): New
function.
(can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr): New function.
(rs6000_emit_set_long_const): Call can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr and
can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c: Add more tests.
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc   | 61 ++-
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c  | 44 +
 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
index 03cd9d5e952..2a3fa733b45 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
@@ -10332,6 +10332,61 @@ can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (HOST_WIDE_INT c, 
int *shift,
   return false;
 }
 
+/* Check if value C can be built by 2 instructions: one is 'li or lis',
+   another is rldicl.
+
+   If so, *SHIFT is set to the shift operand of rldicl, and *MASK is set to
+   the mask operand of rldicl, and return true.
+   Return false otherwise.  */
+
+static bool
+can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
+  HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
+{
+  /* Leading zeros may be cleaned by rldicl with a mask.  Change leading zeros
+ to ones and then recheck it.  */
+  int lz = clz_hwi (c);
+  HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c
+= c | (HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - lz));
+  int n;
+  if (can_be_rotated_to_negative_li (unmask_c, &n)
+  || can_be_rotated_to_negative_lis (unmask_c, &n))
+{
+  *mask = HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U >> lz;
+  *shift = n == 0 ? 0 : HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - n;
+  return true;
+}
+
+  return false;
+}
+
+/* Check if value C can be built by 2 instructions: one is 'li or lis',
+   another is rldicr.
+
+   If so, *SHIFT is set to the shift operand of rldicr, and *MASK is set to
+   the mask operand of rldicr, and return true.
+   Return false otherwise.  */
+
+static bool
+can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
+  HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
+{
+  /* Tailing zeros may be cleaned by rldicr with a mask.  Change tailing zeros
+ to ones and then recheck it.  */
+  int tz = ctz_hwi (c);
+  HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c = c | ((HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << tz) - 1);
+  int n;
+  if (can_be_rotated_to_negative_li (unmask_c, &n)
+  || can_be_rotated_to_negative_lis (unmask_c, &n))
+{
+  *mask = HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << tz;
+  *shift = HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - n;
+  return true;
+}
+
+  return false;
+}
+
 /* Subroutine of rs6000_emit_set_const, handling PowerPC64 DImode.
Output insns to set DEST equal to the constant C as a series of
lis, ori and shl instructions.  */
@@ -10378,7 +10433,9 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
   emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_XOR (DImode, temp,
 GEN_INT ((ud2 ^ 0x) << 16)));
 }
-  else if (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (c, &shift, &mask))
+  else if (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (c, &shift, &mask)
+  || can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl (c, &shift, &mask)
+  || can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr (c, &shift, &mask))
 {
   temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
   unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT imm = (c | ~mask);
@@ -10387,6 +10444,8 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
   emit_move_insn (temp, GEN_INT (imm));
   if (shift != 0)
temp = gen_rtx_ROTATE (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (shift));
+  if (mask != HOST_WIDE_INT_M1)
+   temp = gen_rtx_AND (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (mask));
   emit_move_insn (dest, temp);
 }
   else if (ud3 == 0 && ud4 == 0)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
index c38a1dd91f2..8c209921d41 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
@@ -46,6 +46,42 @@ lis_rotldi_6 (void)
   return 0x5318LL;
 }
 
+long long NOIPA
+li_rldicl_7 (void)
+{
+  return 0x3ffa1LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+li_rldicl_8 (void)
+{
+  return 0xff8531LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+lis_rldicl_9 (void)
+{
+  return 0x00ff8531LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+li_rldicr_10 (void)
+{
+  return 0x8531fff0LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+li_rldicr_11 (void)
+{
+  return 0x21f0LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+lis_rldicr_12 (void)
+{
+  return 0x5310LL;
+}
+
 struct fun arr[] = {
   {li_rotldi_1, 0x75310LL},
   {li_rotldi_2, 0x2164LL},
@@ -53,9 +89,17 @@ struct fun arr[] = {
  

[PATCH 3/4] rs6000: build constant via li/lis;rldicl/rldicr

2023-02-03 Thread Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches
Hi,

This patch checks if a constant is possible left/right cleaned on a rotated
value from a negative value of "li/lis".  If so, we can build the constant
through "li/lis ; rldicl/rldicr".

Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64{,le}.
Is this ok for trunk or next stage1?

BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)

gcc/ChangeLog:

* config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl): New
function.
(can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr): New function.
(rs6000_emit_set_long_const): Call can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr and
can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c: Add more tests.

---
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc   | 57 ++-
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c  | 44 ++
 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
index dcbd5820a52..025abaa436e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
@@ -10308,6 +10308,59 @@ can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (HOST_WIDE_INT c, 
int *shift,
   return false;
 }
 
+/* Check if value C can be built by 2 instructions: one is 'li or lis',
+   another is rldicl.
+
+   If so, *SHIFT is set to the shift operand of rldicl, and *MASK is set to
+   the mask operand of rldicl, and return true.
+   Return false otherwise.  */
+static bool
+can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
+  HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
+{
+  /* Leading zeros maybe cleaned by rldicl with mask.  Change leading zeros
+ to ones and then recheck it.  */
+  int lz = clz_hwi (c);
+  HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c
+= c | (HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - lz));
+  int n;
+  if (can_be_rotated_to_negative_li (unmask_c, &n)
+  || can_be_rotated_to_negative_lis (unmask_c, &n))
+{
+  *mask = HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U >> lz;
+  *shift = n == 0 ? 0 : HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - n;
+  return true;
+}
+
+  return false;
+}
+
+/* Check if value C can be built by 2 instructions: one is 'li or lis',
+   another is rldicr.
+
+   If so, *SHIFT is set to the shift operand of rldicr, and *MASK is set to
+   the mask operand of rldicr, and return true.
+   Return false otherwise.  */
+static bool
+can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
+  HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
+{
+  /* Tailing zeros maybe cleaned by rldicr with mask.  Change tailing zeros
+ to ones and then recheck it.  */
+  int tz = ctz_hwi (c);
+  HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c = c | ((HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << tz) - 1);
+  int n;
+  if (can_be_rotated_to_negative_li (unmask_c, &n)
+  || can_be_rotated_to_negative_lis (unmask_c, &n))
+{
+  *mask = HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << tz;
+  *shift = HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - n;
+  return true;
+}
+
+  return false;
+}
+
 /* Subroutine of rs6000_emit_set_const, handling PowerPC64 DImode.
Output insns to set DEST equal to the constant C as a series of
lis, ori and shl instructions.  */
@@ -10347,7 +10400,9 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
   emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_XOR (DImode, temp,
 GEN_INT ((ud2 ^ 0x) << 16)));
 }
-  else if (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (c, &shift, &mask))
+  else if (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rotldi (c, &shift, &mask)
+  || can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl (c, &shift, &mask)
+  || can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr (c, &shift, &mask))
 {
   temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
   unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT imm = (c | ~mask);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
index c38a1dd91f2..8c209921d41 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/const-build.c
@@ -46,6 +46,42 @@ lis_rotldi_6 (void)
   return 0x5318LL;
 }
 
+long long NOIPA
+li_rldicl_7 (void)
+{
+  return 0x3ffa1LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+li_rldicl_8 (void)
+{
+  return 0xff8531LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+lis_rldicl_9 (void)
+{
+  return 0x00ff8531LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+li_rldicr_10 (void)
+{
+  return 0x8531fff0LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+li_rldicr_11 (void)
+{
+  return 0x21f0LL;
+}
+
+long long NOIPA
+lis_rldicr_12 (void)
+{
+  return 0x5310LL;
+}
+
 struct fun arr[] = {
   {li_rotldi_1, 0x75310LL},
   {li_rotldi_2, 0x2164LL},
@@ -53,9 +89,17 @@ struct fun arr[] = {
   {li_rotldi_4, 0x2194LL},
   {lis_rotldi_5, 0x8531LL},
   {lis_rotldi_6, 0x5318LL},
+  {li_rldicl_7, 0x3ffa1LL},
+  {li_rldicl_8, 0xff8531LL},
+  {lis_rldicl_9, 0x00ff8531LL},
+  {li_rldicr_10, 0x8531fff0LL},
+  {li_rldicr_11, 0x21f0LL},
+  {lis_rldicr_12, 0x5310LL},
 };
 
 /* { dg-final