Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Fix Zicond ICE on large constants

2023-09-05 Thread Tsukasa OI via Gcc-patches
On 2023/09/06 10:22, Jeff Law wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/5/23 06:08, Tsukasa OI wrote:
>> From: Tsukasa OI 
>>
>> Large constant cons and/or alt will trigger ICEs building GCC target
>> libraries (libgomp and libatomic) when the 'Zicond' extension is enabled.
>>
>> For instance, zicond-ice-2.c (new test case in this commit) will cause
>> an ICE when SOME_NUMBER is 0x1000 or larger.  While opposite numbers
>> corresponding cons/alt (two temp2 variables) are checked, cons/alt
>> themselves are not checked and causing 2 ICEs building
>> GCC target libraries as of this writing:
>>
>> 1.  gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
>> 2.  gcc/libgomp/fortran.c
>>
>> Coercing a large value into a register will fix the issue.
>>
>> It also coerce a large cons into a register on "imm, imm" case (the
>> author
>> could not reproduce but possible to cause an ICE).
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_conditional_move): Force
>> large constant cons/alt into a register.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c: New test.  This is based on
>> an ICE at libat_lock_n func on gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
>> but heavily minimized.
> "New test." is sufficient.  No need to change it, just a note going
> forward.
> 
> OK.  Thanks for taking care of this.
> 
> jeff
> 

Thanks for reviewing.  I'll remember that for the next time (I am adding
brief description in Binutils but not *that* long compared to this).

Committing.

Tsukasa


Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Fix Zicond ICE on large constants

2023-09-05 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches




On 9/5/23 06:08, Tsukasa OI wrote:

From: Tsukasa OI 

Large constant cons and/or alt will trigger ICEs building GCC target
libraries (libgomp and libatomic) when the 'Zicond' extension is enabled.

For instance, zicond-ice-2.c (new test case in this commit) will cause
an ICE when SOME_NUMBER is 0x1000 or larger.  While opposite numbers
corresponding cons/alt (two temp2 variables) are checked, cons/alt
themselves are not checked and causing 2 ICEs building
GCC target libraries as of this writing:

1.  gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
2.  gcc/libgomp/fortran.c

Coercing a large value into a register will fix the issue.

It also coerce a large cons into a register on "imm, imm" case (the author
could not reproduce but possible to cause an ICE).

gcc/ChangeLog:

* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_conditional_move): Force
large constant cons/alt into a register.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c: New test.  This is based on
an ICE at libat_lock_n func on gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
but heavily minimized.

"New test." is sufficient.  No need to change it, just a note going forward.

OK.  Thanks for taking care of this.

jeff


[PATCH v2] RISC-V: Fix Zicond ICE on large constants

2023-09-05 Thread Tsukasa OI via Gcc-patches
From: Tsukasa OI 

Large constant cons and/or alt will trigger ICEs building GCC target
libraries (libgomp and libatomic) when the 'Zicond' extension is enabled.

For instance, zicond-ice-2.c (new test case in this commit) will cause
an ICE when SOME_NUMBER is 0x1000 or larger.  While opposite numbers
corresponding cons/alt (two temp2 variables) are checked, cons/alt
themselves are not checked and causing 2 ICEs building
GCC target libraries as of this writing:

1.  gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
2.  gcc/libgomp/fortran.c

Coercing a large value into a register will fix the issue.

It also coerce a large cons into a register on "imm, imm" case (the author
could not reproduce but possible to cause an ICE).

gcc/ChangeLog:

* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_conditional_move): Force
large constant cons/alt into a register.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c: New test.  This is based on
an ICE at libat_lock_n func on gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
but heavily minimized.
---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 21 +--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c | 11 ++
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 8d8f7b4f16ed..e306d57814be 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -3917,6 +3917,11 @@ riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx dest, rtx op, rtx 
cons, rtx alt)
  gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (mode, cond,
CONST0_RTX (mode),
alt)));
+ /* CONS might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate suitable
+for an addi instruction.  If that's the case, force it
+into a register.  */
+ if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (cons)))
+   cons = force_reg (mode, cons);
  riscv_emit_binary (PLUS, dest, dest, cons);
  return true;
}
@@ -3940,11 +3945,13 @@ riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx dest, rtx op, rtx 
cons, rtx alt)
  rtx temp1 = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
  rtx temp2 = gen_int_mode (-1 * INTVAL (cons), mode);
 
- /* TEMP2 might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate suitable
-for an addi instruction.  If that's the case, force it into
-a register.  */
+ /* TEMP2 and/or CONS might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate
+suitable for an addi instruction.  If that's the case, force it
+into a register.  */
  if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (temp2)))
temp2 = force_reg (mode, temp2);
+ if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (cons)))
+   cons = force_reg (mode, cons);
 
  riscv_emit_binary (PLUS, temp1, alt, temp2);
  emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (dest,
@@ -3986,11 +3993,13 @@ riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx dest, rtx op, rtx 
cons, rtx alt)
  rtx temp1 = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
  rtx temp2 = gen_int_mode (-1 * INTVAL (alt), mode);
 
- /* TEMP2 might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate suitable
-for an addi instruction.  If that's the case, force it into
-a register.  */
+ /* TEMP2 and/or ALT might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate
+suitable for an addi instruction.  If that's the case, force it
+into a register.  */
  if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (temp2)))
temp2 = force_reg (mode, temp2);
+ if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (alt)))
+   alt = force_reg (mode, alt);
 
  riscv_emit_binary (PLUS, temp1, cons, temp2);
  emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (dest,
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c
new file mode 100644
index ..ffd8dcb5814e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zicond -mabi=lp64d" { target { rv64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv32gc_zicond -mabi=ilp32d" { target { rv32 } } } */
+
+#define SOME_NUMBER 0x1000
+
+unsigned long
+d (unsigned long n)
+{
+  return n > SOME_NUMBER ? SOME_NUMBER : n;
+}

base-commit: 72b639760a891c406725854bfb08132c83f0761a
-- 
2.42.0