Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
Hi,
I've now pushed the below change to the following branches with the
corresponding commit id.
trunk: 9ddad76e98ac8f257f90b3814ed3c6ba78d0f3c7
releases/gcc-14: da3a6b0dda45bc676bb985d7940853b50803e11a
releases/gcc-13: 75d394c20b0ad85dfe8511324d61d13e453c9285
releases/gcc-12: d9c89402b54be4c15bb3c7bcce3465f534746204
releases/gcc-11: 08ca81e4b49bda153d678a372df7f7143a94f4ad
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-22 13:54, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 22/05/2024 12:14, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hello Richard,
Thanks for the reply.
From my point of view, at least the -fshort-enums part should be on all
branches. Just to be clean, maybe it's easier to backport the entire patch?
Yes, that's a fair point. I was only thinking about the broadening of the test
to the other argument registers when I said that.
So, just to be clear, OK all.
R.
Unless you have an objection, I would like to go ahead and just backport it to
all branches.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-22 12:55, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 06/05/2024 12:50, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Forgot to mention when I sent the patch that I would like to commit it to the
following branches:
- releases/gcc-11
- releases/gcc-12
- releases/gcc-13
- releases/gcc-14
- trunk
Well you can [commit it to the release branches], but I'm not sure it's
essential. It seems pretty unlikely to me that this would regress on a release
branch without having first regressed on trunk.
R.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-02 12:50, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to
verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0.
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc test is done using -O0 to ensure the
instructions are in a predictable order.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Add
-fshort-enums.
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c: Add -fshort-enums option.
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON
---
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c | 21 +++
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
index 01fac786238..d01ef87e0be 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
(enum offset index) {
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
-
}
/*
@@ -88,9 +87,23 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
(enum offset index) {
** ...
*/
__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool index) {
-
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
+}
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+/*
+**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc:
+** ...
+** uxtb r0, r0
+** uxtb r1, r1
+** uxth r2, r2
+** uxtb r3, r3
+** ...
+*/
+__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c, enum
offset d) {
+ size_t index = a + b + c + d;
+ if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
+ return 0;
+ return array[index];
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
index cf731ed33df..081de0d699f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -89,4 +89,4 @@ unsigned char __attribute__((noipa)) enumNonsecure0
(ns_enum_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
unsigned char boolNonsecure0 (ns_bool_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
{
return ns_foo_p ();
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
On 22/05/2024 12:14, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> From my point of view, at least the -fshort-enums part should be on all
> branches. Just to be clean, maybe it's easier to backport the entire patch?
Yes, that's a fair point. I was only thinking about the broadening of the test
to the other argument registers when I said that.
So, just to be clear, OK all.
R.
>
> Unless you have an objection, I would like to go ahead and just backport it
> to all branches.
>
> Kind regards,
> Torbjörn
>
> On 2024-05-22 12:55, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 06/05/2024 12:50, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Forgot to mention when I sent the patch that I would like to commit it to
>>> the following branches:
>>>
>>> - releases/gcc-11
>>> - releases/gcc-12
>>> - releases/gcc-13
>>> - releases/gcc-14
>>> - trunk
>>>
>>
>> Well you can [commit it to the release branches], but I'm not sure it's
>> essential. It seems pretty unlikely to me that this would regress on a
>> release branch without having first regressed on trunk.
>>
>> R.
>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Torbjörn
>>>
>>> On 2024-05-02 12:50, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to
verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0.
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc test is done using -O0 to ensure the
instructions are in a predictable order.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Add
-fshort-enums.
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c: Add -fshort-enums option.
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON
---
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c | 21 +++
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
index 01fac786238..d01ef87e0be 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char
enumSecureFunc (enum offset index) {
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
-
}
/*
@@ -88,9 +87,23 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char
enumSecureFunc (enum offset index) {
** ...
*/
__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool index) {
-
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
+}
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+/*
+**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc:
+** ...
+** uxtb r0, r0
+** uxtb r1, r1
+** uxth r2, r2
+** uxtb r3, r3
+** ...
+*/
+__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c,
enum offset d) {
+ size_t index = a + b + c + d;
+ if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
+ return 0;
+ return array[index];
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
index cf731ed33df..081de0d699f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -89,4 +89,4 @@ unsigned char __attribute__((noipa)) enumNonsecure0
(ns_enum_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
unsigned char boolNonsecure0 (ns_bool_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
{
return ns_foo_p ();
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
>>
Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
Hello Richard,
Thanks for the reply.
From my point of view, at least the -fshort-enums part should be on all
branches. Just to be clean, maybe it's easier to backport the entire patch?
Unless you have an objection, I would like to go ahead and just backport
it to all branches.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-22 12:55, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 06/05/2024 12:50, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Forgot to mention when I sent the patch that I would like to commit it to the
following branches:
- releases/gcc-11
- releases/gcc-12
- releases/gcc-13
- releases/gcc-14
- trunk
Well you can [commit it to the release branches], but I'm not sure it's
essential. It seems pretty unlikely to me that this would regress on a release
branch without having first regressed on trunk.
R.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-02 12:50, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to
verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0.
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc test is done using -O0 to ensure the
instructions are in a predictable order.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Add
-fshort-enums.
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c: Add -fshort-enums option.
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON
---
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c | 21 +++
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
index 01fac786238..d01ef87e0be 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
(enum offset index) {
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
-
}
/*
@@ -88,9 +87,23 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
(enum offset index) {
** ...
*/
__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool index) {
-
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
+}
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+/*
+**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc:
+** ...
+** uxtb r0, r0
+** uxtb r1, r1
+** uxth r2, r2
+** uxtb r3, r3
+** ...
+*/
+__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c, enum
offset d) {
+ size_t index = a + b + c + d;
+ if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
+ return 0;
+ return array[index];
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
index cf731ed33df..081de0d699f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -89,4 +89,4 @@ unsigned char __attribute__((noipa)) enumNonsecure0
(ns_enum_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
unsigned char boolNonsecure0 (ns_bool_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
{
return ns_foo_p ();
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
On 06/05/2024 12:50, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Forgot to mention when I sent the patch that I would like to commit it to the
> following branches:
>
> - releases/gcc-11
> - releases/gcc-12
> - releases/gcc-13
> - releases/gcc-14
> - trunk
>
Well you can [commit it to the release branches], but I'm not sure it's
essential. It seems pretty unlikely to me that this would regress on a release
branch without having first regressed on trunk.
R.
> Kind regards,
> Torbjörn
>
> On 2024-05-02 12:50, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
>> Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to
>> verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0.
>>
>> boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc test is done using -O0 to ensure the
>> instructions are in a predictable order.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Add
>> -fshort-enums.
>> * gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c: Add -fshort-enums option.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON
>> ---
>> .../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c | 21 +++
>> .../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
>> index 01fac786238..d01ef87e0be 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> /* { dg-do compile } */
>> -/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
>> /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
>> #include
>> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
>> (enum offset index) {
>> if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
>> return 0;
>> return array[index];
>> -
>> }
>> /*
>> @@ -88,9 +87,23 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
>> (enum offset index) {
>> ** ...
>> */
>> __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool index) {
>> -
>> if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
>> return 0;
>> return array[index];
>> +}
>> -}
>> \ No newline at end of file
>> +/*
>> +**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc:
>> +** ...
>> +** uxtb r0, r0
>> +** uxtb r1, r1
>> +** uxth r2, r2
>> +** uxtb r3, r3
>> +** ...
>> +*/
>> +__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char
>> boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c, enum
>> offset d) {
>> + size_t index = a + b + c + d;
>> + if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
>> + return 0;
>> + return array[index];
>> +}
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
>> index cf731ed33df..081de0d699f 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> /* { dg-do compile } */
>> -/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
>> /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
>> #include
>> @@ -89,4 +89,4 @@ unsigned char __attribute__((noipa)) enumNonsecure0
>> (ns_enum_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
>> unsigned char boolNonsecure0 (ns_bool_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
>> {
>> return ns_foo_p ();
>> -}
>> \ No newline at end of file
>> +}
[PING^2] [PATCH v2] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
Gentle ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-14 13:01, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if the previous "ok" from Richard on the v1 is enough for
this or if there needs another approval.
Adding extra maintainers since Richard Earnshaw appears to be busy the
past weeks.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-06 13:50, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Forgot to mention when I sent the patch that I would like to commit it
to the following branches:
- releases/gcc-11
- releases/gcc-12
- releases/gcc-13
- releases/gcc-14
- trunk
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-02 12:50, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to
verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0.
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc test is done using -O0 to ensure the
instructions are in a predictable order.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Add
-fshort-enums.
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c: Add -fshort-enums option.
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON
---
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c | 21 +++
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
index 01fac786238..d01ef87e0be 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char
enumSecureFunc (enum offset index) {
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
-
}
/*
@@ -88,9 +87,23 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char
enumSecureFunc (enum offset index) {
** ...
*/
__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool
index) {
-
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
+}
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+/*
+**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc:
+** ...
+** uxtb r0, r0
+** uxtb r1, r1
+** uxth r2, r2
+** uxtb r3, r3
+** ...
+*/
+__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short
c, enum offset d) {
+ size_t index = a + b + c + d;
+ if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
+ return 0;
+ return array[index];
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
index cf731ed33df..081de0d699f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -89,4 +89,4 @@ unsigned char __attribute__((noipa)) enumNonsecure0
(ns_enum_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
unsigned char boolNonsecure0 (ns_bool_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
{
return ns_foo_p ();
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
[PING] [PATCH v2] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
Hi,
I'm not sure if the previous "ok" from Richard on the v1 is enough for
this or if there needs another approval.
Adding extra maintainers since Richard Earnshaw appears to be busy the
past weeks.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-06 13:50, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Forgot to mention when I sent the patch that I would like to commit it
to the following branches:
- releases/gcc-11
- releases/gcc-12
- releases/gcc-13
- releases/gcc-14
- trunk
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-02 12:50, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to
verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0.
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc test is done using -O0 to ensure the
instructions are in a predictable order.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Add
-fshort-enums.
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c: Add -fshort-enums option.
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON
---
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c | 21 +++
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
index 01fac786238..d01ef87e0be 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char
enumSecureFunc (enum offset index) {
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
-
}
/*
@@ -88,9 +87,23 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char
enumSecureFunc (enum offset index) {
** ...
*/
__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool
index) {
-
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
+}
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+/*
+**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc:
+** ...
+** uxtb r0, r0
+** uxtb r1, r1
+** uxth r2, r2
+** uxtb r3, r3
+** ...
+*/
+__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short
c, enum offset d) {
+ size_t index = a + b + c + d;
+ if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
+ return 0;
+ return array[index];
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
index cf731ed33df..081de0d699f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -89,4 +89,4 @@ unsigned char __attribute__((noipa)) enumNonsecure0
(ns_enum_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
unsigned char boolNonsecure0 (ns_bool_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
{
return ns_foo_p ();
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
Hi,
Forgot to mention when I sent the patch that I would like to commit it
to the following branches:
- releases/gcc-11
- releases/gcc-12
- releases/gcc-13
- releases/gcc-14
- trunk
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-02 12:50, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to
verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0.
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc test is done using -O0 to ensure the
instructions are in a predictable order.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Add
-fshort-enums.
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c: Add -fshort-enums option.
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON
---
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c| 21 +++
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
index 01fac786238..d01ef87e0be 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
(enum offset index) {
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
-
}
/*
@@ -88,9 +87,23 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
(enum offset index) {
**...
*/
__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool index) {
-
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
+}
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+/*
+**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc:
+** ...
+** uxtbr0, r0
+** uxtbr1, r1
+** uxthr2, r2
+** uxtbr3, r3
+** ...
+*/
+__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c, enum
offset d) {
+ size_t index = a + b + c + d;
+ if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
+return 0;
+ return array[index];
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
index cf731ed33df..081de0d699f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -89,4 +89,4 @@ unsigned char __attribute__((noipa)) enumNonsecure0
(ns_enum_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
unsigned char boolNonsecure0 (ns_bool_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
{
return ns_foo_p ();
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
[PATCH v2] testsuite: Verify r0-r3 are extended with CMSE
Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to
verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0.
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc test is done using -O0 to ensure the
instructions are in a predictable order.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c: Add regression test. Add
-fshort-enums.
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c: Add -fshort-enums option.
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON
---
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c| 21 +++
.../gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
index 01fac786238..d01ef87e0be 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-param.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
(enum offset index) {
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
-
}
/*
@@ -88,9 +87,23 @@ __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char enumSecureFunc
(enum offset index) {
** ...
*/
__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry)) char boolSecureFunc (bool index) {
-
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
return 0;
return array[index];
+}
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+/*
+**__acle_se_boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc:
+** ...
+** uxtbr0, r0
+** uxtbr1, r1
+** uxthr2, r2
+** uxtbr3, r3
+** ...
+*/
+__attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry,optimize(0))) char
boolCharShortEnumSecureFunc (bool a, unsigned char b, unsigned short c, enum
offset d) {
+ size_t index = a + b + c + d;
+ if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE)
+return 0;
+ return array[index];
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
index cf731ed33df..081de0d699f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/extend-return.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mcmse" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mcmse -fshort-enums" } */
/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
#include
@@ -89,4 +89,4 @@ unsigned char __attribute__((noipa)) enumNonsecure0
(ns_enum_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
unsigned char boolNonsecure0 (ns_bool_foo_t * ns_foo_p)
{
return ns_foo_p ();
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
--
2.25.1
