[PING] PATCH v5 4/4] ree: Improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined ABI interfaces.

2023-06-26 Thread Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches
All:

Ok for trunk. Please review.

Thanks & Regards
Ajit

On 26/06/23 6:12 pm, Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches wrote:
> All:
> 
> Ok for trunk. Please review.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Ajit
> 
> On 01/06/23 10:53 am, Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hello All:
>>
>> This new version of patch 4 use improve ree pass for rs6000 target using 
>> defined ABI interfaces.
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on power64-linux-gnu.
>>
>> Review comments incorporated.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> Ajit
>>
>> Improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined abi interfaces
>>
>> For rs6000 target we see redundant zero and sign
>> extension and done to improve ree pass to eliminate
>> such redundant zero and sign extension using defined
>> ABI interfaces.
>>
>> 2023-06-01  Ajit Kumar Agarwal  
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>>  * ree.cc (combine_reaching_defs): Use of  zero_extend and sign_extend
>>  defined abi interfaces.
>>  (add_removable_extension): Use of defined abi interfaces for no
>>  reaching defs.
>>  (abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p): New function.
>>  (abi_extension_candidate_p): New function.
>>  (abi_extension_candidate_argno_p): New function.
>>  (abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p): New function.
>>  (abi_target_promote_function_mode): New function.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
>> ---
>>  gcc/ree.cc| 199 +++---
>>  .../g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C  |  13 ++
>>  2 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/ree.cc b/gcc/ree.cc
>> index fc04249fa84..2025a7c43da 100644
>> --- a/gcc/ree.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/ree.cc
>> @@ -514,7 +514,8 @@ get_uses (rtx_insn *insn, rtx reg)
>>  if (REGNO (DF_REF_REG (def)) == REGNO (reg))
>>break;
>>  
>> -  gcc_assert (def != NULL);
>> +  if (def == NULL)
>> +return NULL;
>>  
>>ref_chain = DF_REF_CHAIN (def);
>>  
>> @@ -750,6 +751,120 @@ get_extended_src_reg (rtx src)
>>return src;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Return TRUE if target mode is equal to source mode of zero_extend
>> +   or sign_extend otherwise false.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_target_promote_function_mode (machine_mode mode)
>> +{
>> +  int unsignedp;
>> +  machine_mode tgt_mode =
>> +targetm.calls.promote_function_mode (NULL_TREE, mode, ,
>> + NULL_TREE, 1);
>> +
>> +  if (tgt_mode == mode)
>> +return true;
>> +  else
>> +return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
>> +   an return  registers.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (rtx_insn *insn, int regno)
>> +{
>> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
>> +
>> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
>> +return false;
>> +
>> +  if (FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P (regno))
>> +return true;
>> +
>> +  return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return TRUE if reg source operand of zero_extend is argument registers
>> +   and not return registers and source and destination operand are same
>> +   and mode of source and destination operand are not same.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_extension_candidate_p (rtx_insn *insn)
>> +{
>> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
>> +
>> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
>> +return false;
>> +
>> +  machine_mode ext_dst_mode = GET_MODE (SET_DEST (set));
>> +  rtx orig_src = XEXP (SET_SRC (set),0);
>> +
>> +  bool copy_needed
>> += (REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
>> +
>> +  if (!copy_needed && ext_dst_mode != GET_MODE (orig_src)
>> +  && FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (REGNO (orig_src))
>> +  && !abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (insn, REGNO (orig_src)))
>> +return true;
>> +
>> +  return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
>> +   an argument registers.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_extension_candidate_argno_p (rtx_code code, int regno)
>> +{
>> +  if (code !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
>> +return false;
>> +
>> +  if (FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (regno))
>> +return true;
>> +
>> +  return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn doesn't have defs and have
>> + * uses without RTX_BIN_ARITH/RTX_COMM_ARITH/RTX_UNARY rtx class.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p (rtx_insn *insn)
>> +{
>> +  if (side_effects_p (PATTERN (insn)))
>> +return false;
>> +
>> +  struct df_link *uses
>> += get_uses (insn, SET_DEST (PATTERN (insn)));
>> +
>> +  if (!uses)
>> +return false;
>> +
>> +  for (df_link *use = uses; use; use = use->next)
>> +{
>> +  if (!use->ref)
>> +return false;
>> +
>> +  if (BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn)
>> +  != BLOCK_FOR_INSN (DF_REF_INSN (use->ref)))
>> +return false;
>> +
>> +  rtx_insn *use_insn = DF_REF_INSN (use->ref);
>> +
>> +  if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (use_insn)) == SET)
>> +{
>> +  

[PING] PATCH v5 4/4] ree: Improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined ABI interfaces.

2023-06-26 Thread Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches
All:

Ok for trunk. Please review.


Thanks & Regards
Ajit

On 01/06/23 10:53 am, Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hello All:
> 
> This new version of patch 4 use improve ree pass for rs6000 target using 
> defined ABI interfaces.
> Bootstrapped and regtested on power64-linux-gnu.
> 
> Review comments incorporated.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Ajit
> 
> Improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined abi interfaces
> 
> For rs6000 target we see redundant zero and sign
> extension and done to improve ree pass to eliminate
> such redundant zero and sign extension using defined
> ABI interfaces.
> 
> 2023-06-01  Ajit Kumar Agarwal  
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>   * ree.cc (combine_reaching_defs): Use of  zero_extend and sign_extend
>   defined abi interfaces.
>   (add_removable_extension): Use of defined abi interfaces for no
>   reaching defs.
>   (abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p): New function.
>   (abi_extension_candidate_p): New function.
>   (abi_extension_candidate_argno_p): New function.
>   (abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p): New function.
>   (abi_target_promote_function_mode): New function.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> * g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> ---
>  gcc/ree.cc| 199 +++---
>  .../g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C  |  13 ++
>  2 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/ree.cc b/gcc/ree.cc
> index fc04249fa84..2025a7c43da 100644
> --- a/gcc/ree.cc
> +++ b/gcc/ree.cc
> @@ -514,7 +514,8 @@ get_uses (rtx_insn *insn, rtx reg)
>  if (REGNO (DF_REF_REG (def)) == REGNO (reg))
>break;
>  
> -  gcc_assert (def != NULL);
> +  if (def == NULL)
> +return NULL;
>  
>ref_chain = DF_REF_CHAIN (def);
>  
> @@ -750,6 +751,120 @@ get_extended_src_reg (rtx src)
>return src;
>  }
>  
> +/* Return TRUE if target mode is equal to source mode of zero_extend
> +   or sign_extend otherwise false.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_target_promote_function_mode (machine_mode mode)
> +{
> +  int unsignedp;
> +  machine_mode tgt_mode =
> +targetm.calls.promote_function_mode (NULL_TREE, mode, ,
> +  NULL_TREE, 1);
> +
> +  if (tgt_mode == mode)
> +return true;
> +  else
> +return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
> +   an return  registers.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (rtx_insn *insn, int regno)
> +{
> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
> +
> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
> +return false;
> +
> +  if (FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P (regno))
> +return true;
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if reg source operand of zero_extend is argument registers
> +   and not return registers and source and destination operand are same
> +   and mode of source and destination operand are not same.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_extension_candidate_p (rtx_insn *insn)
> +{
> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
> +
> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
> +return false;
> +
> +  machine_mode ext_dst_mode = GET_MODE (SET_DEST (set));
> +  rtx orig_src = XEXP (SET_SRC (set),0);
> +
> +  bool copy_needed
> += (REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
> +
> +  if (!copy_needed && ext_dst_mode != GET_MODE (orig_src)
> +  && FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (REGNO (orig_src))
> +  && !abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (insn, REGNO (orig_src)))
> +return true;
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
> +   an argument registers.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_extension_candidate_argno_p (rtx_code code, int regno)
> +{
> +  if (code !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
> +return false;
> +
> +  if (FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (regno))
> +return true;
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn doesn't have defs and have
> + * uses without RTX_BIN_ARITH/RTX_COMM_ARITH/RTX_UNARY rtx class.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p (rtx_insn *insn)
> +{
> +  if (side_effects_p (PATTERN (insn)))
> +return false;
> +
> +  struct df_link *uses
> += get_uses (insn, SET_DEST (PATTERN (insn)));
> +
> +  if (!uses)
> +return false;
> +
> +  for (df_link *use = uses; use; use = use->next)
> +{
> +  if (!use->ref)
> + return false;
> +
> +  if (BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn)
> +   != BLOCK_FOR_INSN (DF_REF_INSN (use->ref)))
> + return false;
> +
> +  rtx_insn *use_insn = DF_REF_INSN (use->ref);
> +
> +  if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (use_insn)) == SET)
> + {
> +   rtx_code code = GET_CODE (SET_SRC (PATTERN (use_insn)));
> +
> +   if (GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_BIN_ARITH
> +   || GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_COMM_ARITH
> +   || GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_UNARY)
> + return false;
> + }
> +