Re: [committed][nvptx] Add bar.warp.sync

2022-09-14 Thread Tom de Vries via Gcc-patches

On 9/14/22 11:41, Thomas Schwinge wrote:

Hi Tom!

On 2022-02-01T19:31:13+0100, Tom de Vries via Gcc-patches 
 wrote:

On a GT 1030 (sm_61), with driver version 470.94 I run into:
...
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/parallel-dims.c \
   -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0 -foffload=nvptx-none \
   -O2 execution test
...


This relates to PR99932 "OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions
starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04".  You've fixed that
for GCC 12+, but testing nvptx offloading for GCC 11, GCC 10 branches on
a system with current Nvidia Driver, we're still running into the several
FAILs and annoying 'WARNING: program timed out' reported in PR99932.

Given that GCC 11, GCC 10 only build '.version 3.1' target libraries, the
patch below is actually a no-op ('!TARGET_PTX_6_0'; thus the attached
"nvptx: Define (dummy) 'TARGET_PTX_6_0'"), but having it makes it easier
to cherry-pick the actual relevant "[nvptx] Add uniform_warp_check insn".

OK to push to GCC 11, GCC 10 branches the attached
"nvptx: Define (dummy) 'TARGET_PTX_6_0'", "[nvptx] Add bar.warp.sync"?



LGTM, and thanks for taking care of this.

Thanks,
- Tom



Re: [committed][nvptx] Add bar.warp.sync

2022-09-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Tom!

On 2022-02-01T19:31:13+0100, Tom de Vries via Gcc-patches 
 wrote:
> On a GT 1030 (sm_61), with driver version 470.94 I run into:
> ...
> FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/parallel-dims.c \
>   -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0 -foffload=nvptx-none \
>   -O2 execution test
> ...

This relates to PR99932 "OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions
starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04".  You've fixed that
for GCC 12+, but testing nvptx offloading for GCC 11, GCC 10 branches on
a system with current Nvidia Driver, we're still running into the several
FAILs and annoying 'WARNING: program timed out' reported in PR99932.

Given that GCC 11, GCC 10 only build '.version 3.1' target libraries, the
patch below is actually a no-op ('!TARGET_PTX_6_0'; thus the attached
"nvptx: Define (dummy) 'TARGET_PTX_6_0'"), but having it makes it easier
to cherry-pick the actual relevant "[nvptx] Add uniform_warp_check insn".

OK to push to GCC 11, GCC 10 branches the attached
"nvptx: Define (dummy) 'TARGET_PTX_6_0'", "[nvptx] Add bar.warp.sync"?


Grüße
 Thomas


> which minimizes to the same test-case as listed in commit "[nvptx] Update
> default ptx isa to 6.3".
>
> The first divergent branch looks like:
> ...
>   {
> .reg .u32 %x;
> mov.u32 %x,%tid.x;
> setp.ne.u32 %r59,%x,0;
>   }
>   @ %r59 bra $L15;
>   mov.u64 %r48,%ar0;
>   mov.u32 %r22,2;
>   ld.u64 %r53,[%r48];
>   mov.u32 %r55,%r22;
>   mov.u32 %r54,1;
>  $L15:
> ...
> and when inspecting the generated SASS, the branch is not setup as a divergent
> branch, but instead as a regular branch.
>
> This causes us to execute a shfl.sync insn in divergent mode, which is likely
> to cause trouble given a remark in the ptx isa version 6.3, which mentions
> that for .target sm_6x or below, all threads must excute the same
> shfl.sync instruction in convergence.
>
> Fix this by placing a "bar.warp.sync 0x" at the desired convergence
> point (in the example above, after $L15).
>
> Tested on x86_64 with nvptx accelerator.
>
> Committed to trunk.
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
>
> [nvptx] Add bar.warp.sync
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2022-01-31  Tom de Vries  
>
>   * config/nvptx/nvptx.cc (nvptx_single): Use nvptx_warpsync.
>   * config/nvptx/nvptx.md (define_c_enum "unspecv"): Add
>   UNSPECV_WARPSYNC.
>   (define_insn "nvptx_warpsync"): New define_insn.
>
> ---
>  gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc | 7 +++
>  gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md | 7 +++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc
> index 262e8f9cc1b..1b91990ca1f 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc
> @@ -4598,6 +4598,7 @@ nvptx_single (unsigned mask, basic_block from, 
> basic_block to)
>rtx_insn *neuter_start = NULL;
>rtx_insn *worker_label = NULL, *vector_label = NULL;
>rtx_insn *worker_jump = NULL, *vector_jump = NULL;
> +  rtx_insn *warp_sync = NULL;
>for (mode = GOMP_DIM_WORKER; mode <= GOMP_DIM_VECTOR; mode++)
>  if (GOMP_DIM_MASK (mode) & skip_mask)
>{
> @@ -4630,11 +4631,15 @@ nvptx_single (unsigned mask, basic_block from, 
> basic_block to)
>   if (tail_branch)
> {
>   label_insn = emit_label_before (label, before);
> + if (TARGET_PTX_6_0 && mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR)
> +   warp_sync = emit_insn_after (gen_nvptx_warpsync (), label_insn);
>   before = label_insn;
> }
>   else
> {
>   label_insn = emit_label_after (label, tail);
> + if (TARGET_PTX_6_0 && mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR)
> +   warp_sync = emit_insn_after (gen_nvptx_warpsync (), label_insn);
>   if ((mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR || mode == GOMP_DIM_WORKER)
>   && CALL_P (tail) && find_reg_note (tail, REG_NORETURN, NULL))
> emit_insn_after (gen_exit (), label_insn);
> @@ -4702,6 +4707,8 @@ nvptx_single (unsigned mask, basic_block from, 
> basic_block to)
>setp.ne.u32 %rcond,%rcondu32,0;
> */
> rtx_insn *label = PREV_INSN (tail);
> +   if (label == warp_sync)
> + label = PREV_INSN (label);
> gcc_assert (label && LABEL_P (label));
> rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (BImode);
> emit_insn_before (gen_movbi (tmp, const0_rtx),
> diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md
> index b39116520ba..b4c7cd6e56d 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ (define_c_enum "unspecv" [
> UNSPECV_CAS
> UNSPECV_XCHG
> UNSPECV_BARSYNC
> +   UNSPECV_WARPSYNC
> UNSPECV_MEMBAR
> UNSPECV_MEMBAR_CTA
> UNSPECV_MEMBAR_GL
> @@ -1978,6 +1979,12 @@ (define_insn "nvptx_barsync"
>}
>[(set_attr "predicable" "false")])
>
> +(define_insn "nvptx_warpsync"
> +  [(unspec_volatile [(const_int 0)] UNSPECV_WARPSYNC)]
> +  "TARGET_PTX_6_0"
> +  "\\tbar.warp.sync\\t0x;"
> +  [(set_attr "predicable" "false")])
> +
>  

[committed][nvptx] Add bar.warp.sync

2022-02-01 Thread Tom de Vries via Gcc-patches
Hi,

On a GT 1030 (sm_61), with driver version 470.94 I run into:
...
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/parallel-dims.c \
  -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0 -foffload=nvptx-none \
  -O2 execution test
...
which minimizes to the same test-case as listed in commit "[nvptx] Update
default ptx isa to 6.3".

The first divergent branch looks like:
...
  {
.reg .u32 %x;
mov.u32 %x,%tid.x;
setp.ne.u32 %r59,%x,0;
  }
  @ %r59 bra $L15;
  mov.u64 %r48,%ar0;
  mov.u32 %r22,2;
  ld.u64 %r53,[%r48];
  mov.u32 %r55,%r22;
  mov.u32 %r54,1;
 $L15:
...
and when inspecting the generated SASS, the branch is not setup as a divergent
branch, but instead as a regular branch.

This causes us to execute a shfl.sync insn in divergent mode, which is likely
to cause trouble given a remark in the ptx isa version 6.3, which mentions
that for .target sm_6x or below, all threads must excute the same
shfl.sync instruction in convergence.

Fix this by placing a "bar.warp.sync 0x" at the desired convergence
point (in the example above, after $L15).

Tested on x86_64 with nvptx accelerator.

Committed to trunk.

Thanks,
- Tom

[nvptx] Add bar.warp.sync

gcc/ChangeLog:

2022-01-31  Tom de Vries  

* config/nvptx/nvptx.cc (nvptx_single): Use nvptx_warpsync.
* config/nvptx/nvptx.md (define_c_enum "unspecv"): Add
UNSPECV_WARPSYNC.
(define_insn "nvptx_warpsync"): New define_insn.

---
 gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc | 7 +++
 gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md | 7 +++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc
index 262e8f9cc1b..1b91990ca1f 100644
--- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc
@@ -4598,6 +4598,7 @@ nvptx_single (unsigned mask, basic_block from, 
basic_block to)
   rtx_insn *neuter_start = NULL;
   rtx_insn *worker_label = NULL, *vector_label = NULL;
   rtx_insn *worker_jump = NULL, *vector_jump = NULL;
+  rtx_insn *warp_sync = NULL;
   for (mode = GOMP_DIM_WORKER; mode <= GOMP_DIM_VECTOR; mode++)
 if (GOMP_DIM_MASK (mode) & skip_mask)
   {
@@ -4630,11 +4631,15 @@ nvptx_single (unsigned mask, basic_block from, 
basic_block to)
if (tail_branch)
  {
label_insn = emit_label_before (label, before);
+   if (TARGET_PTX_6_0 && mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR)
+ warp_sync = emit_insn_after (gen_nvptx_warpsync (), label_insn);
before = label_insn;
  }
else
  {
label_insn = emit_label_after (label, tail);
+   if (TARGET_PTX_6_0 && mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR)
+ warp_sync = emit_insn_after (gen_nvptx_warpsync (), label_insn);
if ((mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR || mode == GOMP_DIM_WORKER)
&& CALL_P (tail) && find_reg_note (tail, REG_NORETURN, NULL))
  emit_insn_after (gen_exit (), label_insn);
@@ -4702,6 +4707,8 @@ nvptx_single (unsigned mask, basic_block from, 
basic_block to)
 setp.ne.u32 %rcond,%rcondu32,0;
  */
  rtx_insn *label = PREV_INSN (tail);
+ if (label == warp_sync)
+   label = PREV_INSN (label);
  gcc_assert (label && LABEL_P (label));
  rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (BImode);
  emit_insn_before (gen_movbi (tmp, const0_rtx),
diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md
index b39116520ba..b4c7cd6e56d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md
+++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.md
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ (define_c_enum "unspecv" [
UNSPECV_CAS
UNSPECV_XCHG
UNSPECV_BARSYNC
+   UNSPECV_WARPSYNC
UNSPECV_MEMBAR
UNSPECV_MEMBAR_CTA
UNSPECV_MEMBAR_GL
@@ -1978,6 +1979,12 @@ (define_insn "nvptx_barsync"
   }
   [(set_attr "predicable" "false")])
 
+(define_insn "nvptx_warpsync"
+  [(unspec_volatile [(const_int 0)] UNSPECV_WARPSYNC)]
+  "TARGET_PTX_6_0"
+  "\\tbar.warp.sync\\t0x;"
+  [(set_attr "predicable" "false")])
+
 (define_expand "memory_barrier"
   [(set (match_dup 0)
(unspec_volatile:BLK [(match_dup 0)] UNSPECV_MEMBAR))]