Re: [committed] Minor cleanup/prep in DOM

2022-09-30 Thread Jeff Law


On 9/30/22 18:07, H.J. Lu wrote:

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jeff Law  wrote:


It's a bit weird that free_dom_edge_info leaves a dangling pointer in
e->aux.  Not sure what I was thinking.


There's two callers.  One wipes e->aux immediately after the call, the
other attaches a newly created object immediately after the call.  So we
can wipe e->aux within the call and simplify one of the two call sites.

This is preparatory work for a minor optimization where we want to
detect another class of edge equivalences in DOM (until something better
is available) and either attach them an existing edge_info structure or
create a new one if one doesn't currently exist for a given edge.

Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64.  Installing on the trunk.


I got


[ ... ]

Pushed wrong version.  Sorry about that.  Fixed by attached patch which 
just moves the test down to its proper position.



Jeff


commit aa360fbf68b11e54017e8fa5b1bdb87ce7c19188
Author: Jeff Law 
Date:   Fri Sep 30 20:46:04 2022 -0400

Install correct patch version.

gcc/
* tree-ssa-dom.cc (record_edge_info): Install correct version of
patch.

diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc
index 8d8312ca350..e6b8dace5e9 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc
@@ -684,11 +684,6 @@ record_edge_info (basic_block bb)
   !gsi_end_p (gsi);
   gsi_next ())
{
- /* If the other alternative is the same as the result,
-then this is a degenerate and can be ignored.  */
- if (dst == PHI_ARG_DEF (phi, !alternative))
-   continue;
-
  /* Now get the EDGE_INFO class so we can append
 it to our list.  We want the successor edge
 where the destination is not the source of
@@ -697,6 +692,11 @@ record_edge_info (basic_block bb)
  tree src = PHI_ARG_DEF (phi, alternative);
  tree dst = PHI_RESULT (phi);
 
+ /* If the other alternative is the same as the result,
+then this is a degenerate and can be ignored.  */
+ if (dst == PHI_ARG_DEF (phi, !alternative))
+   continue;
+
  if (EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0)->dest
  != EDGE_PRED (bb, !alternative)->src)
edge_info = (class edge_info *)EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0)->aux;


Re: [committed] Minor cleanup/prep in DOM

2022-09-30 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jeff Law  wrote:
>
>
> It's a bit weird that free_dom_edge_info leaves a dangling pointer in
> e->aux.  Not sure what I was thinking.
>
>
> There's two callers.  One wipes e->aux immediately after the call, the
> other attaches a newly created object immediately after the call.  So we
> can wipe e->aux within the call and simplify one of the two call sites.
>
> This is preparatory work for a minor optimization where we want to
> detect another class of edge equivalences in DOM (until something better
> is available) and either attach them an existing edge_info structure or
> create a new one if one doesn't currently exist for a given edge.
>
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64.  Installing on the trunk.
>

I got


/export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc: In function
‘void record_edge_info(basic_block)’:
/export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc:689:27: error:
‘dst’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘dse’?
  689 |   if (dst == PHI_ARG_DEF (phi, !alternative))
  |   ^~~
  |   dse
In file included from /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/gimple-ssa.h:24,
 from /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/ssa.h:27,
 from /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc:28:
/export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc:689:47: error:
‘phi’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘gphi’?
  689 |   if (dst == PHI_ARG_DEF (phi, !alternative))
  |   ^~~
/export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-operands.h:82:54:
note: in definition of macro ‘PHI_ARG_DEF’
   82 | #define PHI_ARG_DEF(PHI, I) gimple_phi_arg_def ((PHI), (I))
  |  ^~~
make: *** [Makefile:1146: tree-ssa-dom.o] Error 1

-- 
H.J.


[committed] Minor cleanup/prep in DOM

2022-09-30 Thread Jeff Law


It's a bit weird that free_dom_edge_info leaves a dangling pointer in 
e->aux.  Not sure what I was thinking.



There's two callers.  One wipes e->aux immediately after the call, the 
other attaches a newly created object immediately after the call.  So we 
can wipe e->aux within the call and simplify one of the two call sites.


This is preparatory work for a minor optimization where we want to 
detect another class of edge equivalences in DOM (until something better 
is available) and either attach them an existing edge_info structure or 
create a new one if one doesn't currently exist for a given edge.


Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64.  Installing on the trunk.


Jeff

commit fbd95c027edcc169cc3b40806375fbabc08500e0
Author: Jeff Law 
Date:   Fri Sep 30 18:59:24 2022 -0400

Minor cleanup/prep in DOM

It's a bit weird that free_dom_edge_info leaves a dangling pointer in 
e->aux.
Not sure what I was thinking.

There's two callers.  One wipes e->aux immediately after the call, the other
attaches a newly created object immediately after the call.  So we can wipe
e->aux within the call and simplify one of the two call sites.

This is preparatory work for a minor optimization where we want to detect
another class of edge equivalences in DOM (until something better is 
available)
and either attach them an existing edge_info structure or create a new one 
if
one doesn't currently exist for a given edge.

gcc/
* tree-ssa-dom.cc (free_dom_edge_info): Clear e->aux too.
(free_all_edge_infos): Do not clear e->aux here.

diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc
index 84bef798f52..fa43dbe6c44 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.cc
@@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ edge_info::record_simple_equiv (tree lhs, tree rhs)
 simple_equivalences.safe_push (equiv_pair (lhs, rhs));
 }
 
-/* Free the edge_info data attached to E, if it exists.  */
+/* Free the edge_info data attached to E, if it exists and
+   clear e->aux.  */
 
 void
 free_dom_edge_info (edge e)
@@ -402,6 +403,7 @@ free_dom_edge_info (edge e)
 
   if (edge_info)
 delete edge_info;
+  e->aux = NULL;
 }
 
 /* Free all EDGE_INFO structures associated with edges in the CFG.
@@ -420,10 +422,7 @@ free_all_edge_infos (void)
   FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, cfun)
 {
   FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
-{
- free_dom_edge_info (e);
- e->aux = NULL;
-   }
+   free_dom_edge_info (e);
 }
 }