Re: [wwwdocs,Java] java/index.html -- fix formatting on gcc.gnu.org
> On Apr 16, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Gerald Pfeiferwrote: > Soo, GCC 6 has branched -- would it make sense for you guys to > start this removal? No, the home page says: Status: 2016-03-10 (regression fixes & docs only). for gcc 7 (aka trunk). Technically, that should update to say all fixes, _before_ any change goes in. :-) I must admit, I’m not sure why trunk is listed that way now. I did expect branching to have switched that.
Re: [wwwdocs,Java] java/index.html -- fix formatting on gcc.gnu.org
On 16/04/16 21:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Andrew Hughes wrote: >>> That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes >>> have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping >>> this (short of historic reasons)? >> I guess the next news will be the removal of GCJ during the >> GCC 7 development period, so its remaining shelf life should >> be limited anyway. > > Soo, GCC 6 has branched -- would it make sense for you guys to > start this removal? Sounds good. OTOH, I don't think there's any great hurry. > Somewhat related, any concerns if I were to remove > https://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html now? > > ("Status of GCJ as of GCC 3.2" _really_ is rather old.) It's so old that I don't think it's of any use. However, I wonder if it might make more sense to at least have a page saying that GCJ is gone. Andrew.
Re: [wwwdocs,Java] java/index.html -- fix formatting on gcc.gnu.org
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes >> have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping >> this (short of historic reasons)? > I guess the next news will be the removal of GCJ during the > GCC 7 development period, so its remaining shelf life should > be limited anyway. Soo, GCC 6 has branched -- would it make sense for you guys to start this removal? Somewhat related, any concerns if I were to remove https://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html now? ("Status of GCJ as of GCC 3.2" _really_ is rather old.) Gerald
Re: [wwwdocs,Java] java/index.html -- fix formatting on gcc.gnu.org
- Original Message - > It turns out the stricter server settings also broke the /java > page on gcc.gnu.org. > > This restores showing two columns on this page (though it still > uses non-standard CSS extensions). > > > That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes > have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping > this (short of historic reasons)? > > 2016-04-08 Gerald Pfeifer> > * index.html: Replace manual style to establish two columns > by new global CSS class "twocolumns". > > Index: gcc.css > === > RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc.css,v > retrieving revision 1.38 > diff -u -r1.38 gcc.css > --- gcc.css 5 Apr 2016 16:20:29 - 1.38 > +++ gcc.css 9 Apr 2016 16:22:40 - > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ > .highlight{ color: darkslategray; font-weight:bold; } > .smaller { font-size: 80%; } > > +.twocolumns { column-counts:2; -moz-column-count:2; } > + > td.news { width: 50%; padding-right: 8px; } > td.news h2 { font-size: 1.2em; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 2%; } > td.news dl { margin-top:0; } > > Index: java/index.html > === > RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/java/index.html,v > retrieving revision 1.177 > diff -u -r1.177 index.html > --- java/index.html 27 Jun 2014 15:04:39 - 1.177 > +++ java/index.html 9 Apr 2016 16:22:41 - > @@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ > > GCJ News > > - > + > > > > I guess the next news will be the removal of GCJ during the GCC 7 development period, so its remaining shelf life should be limited anyway. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: ed25519/35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
[wwwdocs,Java] java/index.html -- fix formatting on gcc.gnu.org
It turns out the stricter server settings also broke the /java page on gcc.gnu.org. This restores showing two columns on this page (though it still uses non-standard CSS extensions). That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping this (short of historic reasons)? 2016-04-08 Gerald Pfeifer* index.html: Replace manual style to establish two columns by new global CSS class "twocolumns". Index: gcc.css === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc.css,v retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -r1.38 gcc.css --- gcc.css 5 Apr 2016 16:20:29 - 1.38 +++ gcc.css 9 Apr 2016 16:22:40 - @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ .highlight{ color: darkslategray; font-weight:bold; } .smaller { font-size: 80%; } +.twocolumns { column-counts:2; -moz-column-count:2; } + td.news { width: 50%; padding-right: 8px; } td.news h2 { font-size: 1.2em; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 2%; } td.news dl { margin-top:0; } Index: java/index.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/java/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.177 diff -u -r1.177 index.html --- java/index.html 27 Jun 2014 15:04:39 - 1.177 +++ java/index.html 9 Apr 2016 16:22:41 - @@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ GCJ News - +