Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add Zvfbfmin extension to the -march= option

2023-12-15 Thread Xiao Zeng
2023-12-16 03:27  Jeff Law  wrote:
>
 
>
>
>On 12/12/23 20:24, Xiao Zeng wrote:
>> This patch would like to add new sub extension (aka Zvfbfmin) to the
>> -march= option. It introduces a new data type BF16.
>>
>> Depending on different usage scenarios, the Zvfbfmin extension may
>> depend on 'V' or 'Zve32f'. This patch only implements dependencies
>> in scenario of Embedded Processor. In scenario of Application
>> Processor, it is necessary to explicitly indicate the dependent
>> 'V' extension.
>>
>> You can locate more information about Zvfbfmin from below spec doc.
>>
>> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bfloat16/releases/download/20231027/riscv-bfloat16.pdf
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:
>> (riscv_implied_info): Add zvfbfmin item.
>>  (riscv_ext_version_table): Ditto.
>>  (riscv_ext_flag_table): Ditto.
>> * config/riscv/riscv.opt:
>> (MASK_ZVFBFMIN): New macro.
>> (MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_BF_16): Ditto.
>> (TARGET_ZVFBFMIN): Ditto.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/riscv/predef-33.c: New test.
>I fixed the trivial whitespace issue with the ChangeLog and pushed this
>to the trunk. 
Thank you, Jeff. I will pay attention to these issues in the future patches.

>However, I do want to stress that all future
>contributions need to indicate that the patch was successfully
>regression tested. 
Similarly, this should also be indicated.

>
>jeff
 
Thanks
Xiao Zeng



Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add Zvfbfmin extension to the -march= option

2023-12-15 Thread Jeff Law




On 12/12/23 20:24, Xiao Zeng wrote:

This patch would like to add new sub extension (aka Zvfbfmin) to the
-march= option. It introduces a new data type BF16.

Depending on different usage scenarios, the Zvfbfmin extension may
depend on 'V' or 'Zve32f'. This patch only implements dependencies
in scenario of Embedded Processor. In scenario of Application
Processor, it is necessary to explicitly indicate the dependent
'V' extension.

You can locate more information about Zvfbfmin from below spec doc.

https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bfloat16/releases/download/20231027/riscv-bfloat16.pdf

gcc/ChangeLog:

* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:
(riscv_implied_info): Add zvfbfmin item.
 (riscv_ext_version_table): Ditto.
 (riscv_ext_flag_table): Ditto.
* config/riscv/riscv.opt:
(MASK_ZVFBFMIN): New macro.
(MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_BF_16): Ditto.
(TARGET_ZVFBFMIN): Ditto.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/predef-33.c: New test.
I fixed the trivial whitespace issue with the ChangeLog and pushed this 
to the trunk.  However, I do want to stress that all future 
contributions need to indicate that the patch was successfully 
regression tested.


jeff


Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add Zvfbfmin extension to the -march= option

2023-12-14 Thread Xiao Zeng
2023-12-13 11:55  Palmer Dabbelt  wrote:
>
 
>On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:24:51 PST (-0800), zengx...@eswincomputing.com wrote:
>> This patch would like to add new sub extension (aka Zvfbfmin) to the
>> -march= option. It introduces a new data type BF16.
>>
>> Depending on different usage scenarios, the Zvfbfmin extension may
>> depend on 'V' or 'Zve32f'. This patch only implements dependencies
>> in scenario of Embedded Processor. In scenario of Application
>> Processor, it is necessary to explicitly indicate the dependent
>> 'V' extension.
>>
>> You can locate more information about Zvfbfmin from below spec doc.
>>
>> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bfloat16/releases/download/20231027/riscv-bfloat16.pdf
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:
>> (riscv_implied_info): Add zvfbfmin item.
>> (riscv_ext_version_table): Ditto.
>> (riscv_ext_flag_table): Ditto.
>> * config/riscv/riscv.opt:
>> (MASK_ZVFBFMIN): New macro.
>> (MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_BF_16): Ditto.
>> (TARGET_ZVFBFMIN): Ditto.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/riscv/predef-33.c: New test.
>> ---
>>  gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc    |  4 ++
>>  gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt |  4 ++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c   |  5 +++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c   |  5 +++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c | 43 ++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-33.c | 43 ++
>>  6 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-33.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc 
>> b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
>> index 4d5a2f874a2..370d00b8f7a 100644
>> --- a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
>> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ static const riscv_implied_info_t riscv_implied_info[] =
>>
>>    {"zfa", "f"},
>>
>> +  {"zvfbfmin", "zve32f"},
>>    {"zvfhmin", "zve32f"},
>>    {"zvfh", "zve32f"},
>>    {"zvfh", "zfhmin"},
>> @@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ static const struct riscv_ext_version 
>> riscv_ext_version_table[] =
>>
>>    {"zfh",   ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
>>    {"zfhmin",    ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
>> +  {"zvfbfmin",  ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
>>    {"zvfhmin",   ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
>>    {"zvfh",  ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
>>
>> @@ -1657,6 +1659,7 @@ static const riscv_ext_flag_table_t 
>> riscv_ext_flag_table[] =
>>    {"zve64x",   _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
>>MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_64},
>>    {"zve64f",   _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
>>MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_FP_32},
>>    {"zve64d",   _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
>>MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_FP_64},
>> +  {"zvfbfmin", _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
>> MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_BF_16},
>>    {"zvfhmin",  _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
>>MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_FP_16},
>>    {"zvfh", _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
>>MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_FP_16},
>>
>> @@ -1692,6 +1695,7 @@ static const riscv_ext_flag_table_t 
>> riscv_ext_flag_table[] =
>>
>>    {"zfhmin",    _options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZFHMIN},
>>    {"zfh",   _options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZFH},
>> +  {"zvfbfmin",  _options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZVFBFMIN},
>>    {"zvfhmin",   _options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZVFHMIN},
>>    {"zvfh",  _options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZVFH},
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt
>> index 59ce7106ecf..b7c0b72265e 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt
>> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt
>> @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ Mask(VECTOR_ELEN_FP_64) Var(riscv_vector_elen_flags)
>>
>>  Mask(VECTOR_ELEN_FP_16) Var(riscv_vector_elen_flags)
>>
>> +Mask(VECTOR_ELEN_BF_16) Var(riscv_vector_elen_flags)
>> +
>>  TargetVariable
>>  int riscv_zvl_flags
>>
>> @@ -366,6 +368,8 @@ Mask(ZFHMIN)  Var(riscv_zf_subext)
>>
>>  Mask(ZFH) Var(riscv_zf_subext)
>>
>> +Mask(ZVFBFMIN) Var(riscv_zf_subext)
>> +
>>  Mask(ZVFHMIN) Var(riscv_zf_subext)
>>
>>  Mask(ZVFH)    Var(riscv_zf_subext)
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..5180753b905
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv32i_zvfbfmin -mabi=ilp32f" } */
>> +int foo()
>> +{
>> +}
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..49616832512
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
>> 

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add Zvfbfmin extension to the -march= option

2023-12-12 Thread Palmer Dabbelt

On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:24:51 PST (-0800), zengx...@eswincomputing.com wrote:

This patch would like to add new sub extension (aka Zvfbfmin) to the
-march= option. It introduces a new data type BF16.

Depending on different usage scenarios, the Zvfbfmin extension may
depend on 'V' or 'Zve32f'. This patch only implements dependencies
in scenario of Embedded Processor. In scenario of Application
Processor, it is necessary to explicitly indicate the dependent
'V' extension.

You can locate more information about Zvfbfmin from below spec doc.

https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bfloat16/releases/download/20231027/riscv-bfloat16.pdf

gcc/ChangeLog:

* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:
(riscv_implied_info): Add zvfbfmin item.
(riscv_ext_version_table): Ditto.
(riscv_ext_flag_table): Ditto.
* config/riscv/riscv.opt:
(MASK_ZVFBFMIN): New macro.
(MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_BF_16): Ditto.
(TARGET_ZVFBFMIN): Ditto.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/predef-33.c: New test.
---
 gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc|  4 ++
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt |  4 ++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c   |  5 +++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c   |  5 +++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c | 43 ++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-33.c | 43 ++
 6 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-33.c

diff --git a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc 
b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
index 4d5a2f874a2..370d00b8f7a 100644
--- a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
+++ b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ static const riscv_implied_info_t riscv_implied_info[] =

   {"zfa", "f"},

+  {"zvfbfmin", "zve32f"},
   {"zvfhmin", "zve32f"},
   {"zvfh", "zve32f"},
   {"zvfh", "zfhmin"},
@@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ static const struct riscv_ext_version 
riscv_ext_version_table[] =

   {"zfh",   ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
   {"zfhmin",ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
+  {"zvfbfmin",  ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
   {"zvfhmin",   ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
   {"zvfh",  ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},

@@ -1657,6 +1659,7 @@ static const riscv_ext_flag_table_t 
riscv_ext_flag_table[] =
   {"zve64x",   _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_64},
   {"zve64f",   _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_FP_32},
   {"zve64d",   _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_FP_64},
+  {"zvfbfmin", _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_BF_16},
   {"zvfhmin",  _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_FP_16},
   {"zvfh", _options::x_riscv_vector_elen_flags, 
MASK_VECTOR_ELEN_FP_16},

@@ -1692,6 +1695,7 @@ static const riscv_ext_flag_table_t 
riscv_ext_flag_table[] =

   {"zfhmin",_options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZFHMIN},
   {"zfh",   _options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZFH},
+  {"zvfbfmin",  _options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZVFBFMIN},
   {"zvfhmin",   _options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZVFHMIN},
   {"zvfh",  _options::x_riscv_zf_subext, MASK_ZVFH},

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt
index 59ce7106ecf..b7c0b72265e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.opt
@@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ Mask(VECTOR_ELEN_FP_64) Var(riscv_vector_elen_flags)

 Mask(VECTOR_ELEN_FP_16) Var(riscv_vector_elen_flags)

+Mask(VECTOR_ELEN_BF_16) Var(riscv_vector_elen_flags)
+
 TargetVariable
 int riscv_zvl_flags

@@ -366,6 +368,8 @@ Mask(ZFHMIN)  Var(riscv_zf_subext)

 Mask(ZFH) Var(riscv_zf_subext)

+Mask(ZVFBFMIN) Var(riscv_zf_subext)
+
 Mask(ZVFHMIN) Var(riscv_zf_subext)

 Mask(ZVFH)Var(riscv_zf_subext)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..5180753b905
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-31.c
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv32i_zvfbfmin -mabi=ilp32f" } */
+int foo()
+{
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..49616832512
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/arch-32.c
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64iv_zvfbfmin -mabi=lp64d" } */
+int foo()
+{
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..7417e0d996f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-32.c
@@ -0,0 +1,43