[gdal-dev] LAS support

2013-11-28 Thread Rui L. Pires
Hello everyone,

Is there any interest in having LAS as one of the OGR supported formats?

Would there be any particular reason for not supporting it?

I would be willing to collaborate on this effort, if deemed useful.

Regards,
Rui
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] LAS support

2013-11-28 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 28 November 2013 09:51, Rui L. Pires rlpi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello everyone,

 Is there any interest in having LAS as one of the OGR supported formats?

It's been discussed:

http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2011-April/028439.html

 Would there be any particular reason for not supporting it?

Point cloud is not a vector, not a raster either? :-)

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


[gdal-dev] HRE (High resolution elevation) format

2013-11-28 Thread Livneh Yehiyam

Hi
Is there support in gdal for reading elevation in HRE format?

Thanks
Yehiyam Livneh




This message (including any attachments) issued by RAFAEL- ADVANCED DEFENSE 
SYSTEMS LTD. (hereinafter RAFAEL) contains confidential information intended 
for a specific individual and purpose, may constitute information that is 
privileged or confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you should contact us immediately and thereafter 
delete this message from your system. You are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or forwarding of this message, 
or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail 
mailto:law...@rafael.co.il and completely delete or destroy any and all 
electronic or other copies of the original message and any attachments thereof.
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] How to get GDAL

2013-11-28 Thread Jonathan Moules
- From there I've tried both the msi (plus python bindings extra) and
 the
 zip Compiled binaries in a single .zip package- both work for the
 pure-GDAL stuff (gdalinfo) but none of the python scripts works (i.e.
 gdal_merge.py).


 I prefer the zip version, expand it to a folder of my choice, and run the
 SDKshell.bat. In the command window I can do the things I want to do in
 GDAL, without any interfering of other programms, even not from QGIS.
 Inside the shell, all varaibles are set correctly, and therefore all python
 modules run too.
 And it is no problem installing an experimental new GDAL version and
 keeping the old one in parallel.


That would be my preferred option, but as noted, the python stuff doesn't
work. I was getting a python error whenever I tried to run them.

Fortunately the OSGeo4W version works fine.
Cheers,
Jonathan

-- 
This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may 
contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and 
should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or 
authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or 
disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error 
please notify the sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us, 
including without limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording 
and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] HRE (High resolution elevation) format

2013-11-28 Thread Even Rouault
Le jeudi 28 novembre 2013 11:13:14, Livneh Yehiyam a écrit :
 Hi
 Is there support in gdal for reading elevation in HRE format?

If you are thinking to NITF HRE, yes, as indicated in 
http://www.gdal.org/frmt_nitf.html

 
 Thanks
 Yehiyam Livneh
 
 
 
 
 This message (including any attachments) issued by RAFAEL- ADVANCED DEFENSE
 SYSTEMS LTD. (hereinafter RAFAEL) contains confidential information
 intended for a specific individual and purpose, may constitute information
 that is privileged or confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you should contact us immediately
 and thereafter delete this message from your system. You are hereby
 notified that any disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or
 forwarding of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
 strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
 notify us immediately by e-mail mailto:law...@rafael.co.il and completely
 delete or destroy any and all electronic or other copies of the original
 message and any attachments thereof.

-- 
Geospatial professional services
http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] LAS support

2013-11-28 Thread Rui L. Pires
On 28 November 2013 11:03, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:

 On 28 November 2013 09:51, Rui L. Pires rlpi...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello everyone,
 
  Is there any interest in having LAS as one of the OGR supported formats?

 It's been discussed:

 http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2011-April/028439.html


Fair enough.


  Would there be any particular reason for not supporting it?

 Point cloud is not a vector, not a raster either? :-)


That might be debatable, but it won't be me reopening that discussion.
Having said that, if you could assure me that all formats supported in
http://www.gdal.org/ogr/ogr_formats.html are vector formats, I would have
understood your point (of not offering a LAS driver).

Regards,
Rui


On 28 November 2013 11:03, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:

 On 28 November 2013 09:51, Rui L. Pires rlpi...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello everyone,
 
  Is there any interest in having LAS as one of the OGR supported formats?

 It's been discussed:

 http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2011-April/028439.html

  Would there be any particular reason for not supporting it?

 Point cloud is not a vector, not a raster either? :-)

 Best regards,
 --
 Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] LAS support

2013-11-28 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 28 November 2013 13:56, Rui L. Pires rlpi...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 28 November 2013 11:03, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
 On 28 November 2013 09:51, Rui L. Pires rlpi...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Would there be any particular reason for not supporting it?

 Point cloud is not a vector, not a raster either? :-)


 That might be debatable, but it won't be me reopening that discussion.
 Having said that, if you could assure me that all formats supported in
 http://www.gdal.org/ogr/ogr_formats.html are vector formats, I would have
 understood your point (of not offering a LAS driver).

Rui,

I intentionally put question mark to indicate it's open question for me as well.
The nature of LiDAR data might be confusing and I'm interested to
learn more about it.
Dale Lutz said, point cloud is a badly behaved raster.
I (used to) say, it's not a vector.
But I still haven't found clear answer what is it really :)

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


Re: [gdal-dev] LAS support

2013-11-28 Thread Fabian Schindler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Rui,

IMHO point clouds are special form of vector data. But still, an OGR
driver would not be a viable solution.

Did you have a look at PDAL (http://www.pointcloud.org/)? It is
similar to GDAL and seems to have a built-in driver for LAS files.

regards,
Fabian

On 11/28/2013 03:09 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
 On 28 November 2013 13:56, Rui L. Pires rlpi...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 28 November 2013 11:03, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
 wrote:
 On 28 November 2013 09:51, Rui L. Pires rlpi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Would there be any particular reason for not supporting it?
 
 Point cloud is not a vector, not a raster either? :-)
 
 
 That might be debatable, but it won't be me reopening that
 discussion. Having said that, if you could assure me that all
 formats supported in http://www.gdal.org/ogr/ogr_formats.html are
 vector formats, I would have understood your point (of not
 offering a LAS driver).
 
 Rui,
 
 I intentionally put question mark to indicate it's open question
 for me as well. The nature of LiDAR data might be confusing and I'm
 interested to learn more about it. Dale Lutz said, point cloud is
 a badly behaved raster. I (used to) say, it's not a vector. But I
 still haven't found clear answer what is it really :)
 
 Best regards,
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSl0+2AAoJEJoaok7HgajKZkkH/jZ/zxIjsth8OTcDEWFMmaP4
Szn2fL8oGRWnjtM0XRlRWxG1HHJ6o0ZrggjSnEa1DFr98RzXftv0ruknyj99ns5K
dBAdmksXlxGBz4KKdF609TFTgVgT9HyTObuNiqIxklyi8rN/XZBk+mfpQZpNBU3W
/IdXkrvBDWTYAh6YOWfXN+XQkeLpwfRsYk6m+UZRXSzYJdQrphsuUtXQrWJnoE68
9GDDZGgzyBlYiAXYt4nr0rNzvt367J7gXJd8h8Nyrgc3A+btyOjOZ1Jjs06TZGuE
ecM1F9wYARglZ+w6H865asGiJ4r54E2xpakMjgvwD5KTRrNZu6RbE31Tn1hI1ho=
=+UCc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


Re: [gdal-dev] LAS support

2013-11-28 Thread Joaquim Luis



IMHO point clouds are special form of vector data. But still, an OGR
driver would not be a viable solution.


... or as already mentioned of rasters (or grids as I prefer to call 
them when they are so).
By accident I found that that grids stored as XYZ in laszip are 3 times 
smaller than the same grid in netCDF with a deflation level of 9 (the 
maximum).

That makes it a REALLY interesting grid storage format.

Joaquim



Did you have a look at PDAL (http://www.pointcloud.org/)? It is
similar to GDAL and seems to have a built-in driver for LAS files.

regards,
Fabian

On 11/28/2013 03:09 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

On 28 November 2013 13:56, Rui L. Piresrlpi...@gmail.com  wrote:

On 28 November 2013 11:03, Mateusz Loskotmate...@loskot.net
wrote:

On 28 November 2013 09:51, Rui L. Piresrlpi...@gmail.com
wrote:

Would there be any particular reason for not supporting it?

Point cloud is not a vector, not a raster either? :-)


That might be debatable, but it won't be me reopening that
discussion. Having said that, if you could assure me that all
formats supported in http://www.gdal.org/ogr/ogr_formats.html are
vector formats, I would have understood your point (of not
offering a LAS driver).

Rui,

I intentionally put question mark to indicate it's open question
for me as well. The nature of LiDAR data might be confusing and I'm
interested to learn more about it. Dale Lutz said, point cloud is
a badly behaved raster. I (used to) say, it's not a vector. But I
still haven't found clear answer what is it really :)

Best regards,


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSl0+2AAoJEJoaok7HgajKZkkH/jZ/zxIjsth8OTcDEWFMmaP4
Szn2fL8oGRWnjtM0XRlRWxG1HHJ6o0ZrggjSnEa1DFr98RzXftv0ruknyj99ns5K
dBAdmksXlxGBz4KKdF609TFTgVgT9HyTObuNiqIxklyi8rN/XZBk+mfpQZpNBU3W
/IdXkrvBDWTYAh6YOWfXN+XQkeLpwfRsYk6m+UZRXSzYJdQrphsuUtXQrWJnoE68
9GDDZGgzyBlYiAXYt4nr0rNzvt367J7gXJd8h8Nyrgc3A+btyOjOZ1Jjs06TZGuE
ecM1F9wYARglZ+w6H865asGiJ4r54E2xpakMjgvwD5KTRrNZu6RbE31Tn1hI1ho=
=+UCc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev




___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


[gdal-dev] .csvt file doesn't allow space after comma

2013-11-28 Thread David Strip

  
  
I am trying to use a .csv file in a qgis project. After not getting
what I expected, I learned about .csvt files and wrote a file that
looked like
"String", "Integer"

with a space following the comma. This did not work - both fields
were still read as String. After removing the comma I got a String
field and an Integer field. 
The documentation states the list is comma-separated, which I
suppose if strictly interpreted could mean no white space. However,
in general .csv files ignore whitespace following a comma. 
I'm posting this in the event that someone is working with a more
complex .csvt file that fails might have a chance of finding this
when they search for a clue as to why their file isn't working.
  

___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev