Re: [gdal-dev] Refreshing GDAL's logo

[Mateusz Loskot]

On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 22:30, Sean Gillies  wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:56 AM Even Rouault  
> wrote:
>>
>> So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't
>> get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in
>> the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
>> In https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117#issuecomment-570059241 , there's
>> also a variant of nirvn_v3 with the compas/satellite replacing the A.
>>
>> Thoughts ? (PSC and community)
>
>
> Of the three proposals I'm -1 on v1, +0 on v2, -0 on v3.

Likewise, I'm happy to copy Sean's scoring as my own.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] Refreshing GDAL's logo

[Jeff McKenna]

On 2020-02-10 4:56 a.m., Even Rouault wrote:

So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't
get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in
the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
In https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117#issuecomment-570059241 , there's
also a variant of nirvn_v3 with the compas/satellite replacing the A.



Hi Even,

I prefer nirvn_v3 (with the solar panels, which reference the original 
GDAL logo).  I am not a fan of the A in "GDAL" being replaced by that 
symbol.


-jeff


___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] Refreshing GDAL's logo

[Sean Gillies]

Hi Even,

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:56 AM Even Rouault 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we
> didn't
> get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals
> in
> the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
> In https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117#issuecomment-570059241 ,
> there's
> also a variant of nirvn_v3 with the compas/satellite replacing the A.
>
> Thoughts ? (PSC and community)
>

Of the three proposals I'm -1 on v1, +0 on v2, -0 on v3. I'm not a fan of
the green (our planet is blue, no?) and I think the kerning in "G D A L"
could be improved upon, it's too loose for my taste. I appreciate the work
that's gone into the designs, for sure.

-- 
Sean Gillies
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] Refreshing GDAL's logo

[Marsh, Chris]

I personally like nirvn_v2

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 01:56 Even Rouault 
mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com>> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Saskatchewan. 
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know 
the content is safe. If in doubt, please forward suspicious emails to 
phish...@usask.ca


Hi,

So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't
get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in
the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
In https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117#issuecomment-570059241 , there's
also a variant of nirvn_v3 with the compas/satellite replacing the A.

Thoughts ? (PSC and community)

Even

> Hi,
>
> A number of people have expressed a wish to refresh GDAL's logo and have
> already submitted ideas in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117
>
> In order to make the topic advance in a positive way, I suggest the
> following guidelines for an informal contest starting now:
> - Propositions must be added to the above ticket until February 8 any time
> zone. In the spirit of "release early release often", it is suggested that
> people don't wait until the deadline so as to benefit from community
> feedback and potentially improve their proposals.
> - Each proposition must be clearly associated with a "${person_name}_$
> {unique_id}" identifier so we can unambiguously reference propositions.
> - A same person can issue any number of propositions.
> - Community members are invited to express their preferences in the ticket.
> - PSC will have final word on adopting a proposition or keeping the current
> logo if no clear concensus emerges. I hope other PSC members have better
> visual judgment than me to evaluate propositions ;-)
> - The selected proposition will have to be ultimately released as SVG
> readable by FOSS tools. With a color & back-white version
> - The selected proposition will have to be ultimately licensed under CC0 /
> Public domain for the sake of simplicity of use. For due credit, the author
> will be more than welcome to indicate its authorship, typically in rdf
> metadata, as was done for the PROJ logo (*)
> - Perhaps I've forgotten rules that will be added later. Hence the informal
> contest :-)
>
> Happy sketching,
>
> Even
>
> (*) https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OSGeo/PROJ/master/media/logo.svg
>
> PS: I would have appreciated if someone else from the community had taken
> the lead on writing this email, as suggested in the ticket. Don't be shy.


--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
--
Chris Marsh, PhD
University of Saskatchewan
chrismarsh.ca

___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] OGRCreateCoordinateTransformation problem on GDAL 3.0.3 and PROJ 6.3.0

[Even Rouault]

On jeudi 23 janvier 2020 18:43:24 CET Even Rouault wrote:
> On jeudi 23 janvier 2020 18:35:40 CET Edzer Pebesma wrote:
> > On 1/23/20 5:58 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> > >> Thanks! Yes, with SRS->importFromUserInput("EPSG:3857"); etc this works
> > >> fine; I'm OK with the warning, I just don't see how the subsequent
> > >> error
> > >> relates to syntax that is deprecated.
> > > 
> > > I'm looking at this, but haven't yet an explanation. This is very
> > > subtle,
> > > and seems to be linked specifically to EPSG:3857
> 
> OK, memory helping, I finally identified the root cause. This is a bug in
> PROJ. Fix submitted per https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/1873

PROJ 6.3.1 release candidate shipping the fix announced at:
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/2020-February/009360.html

Even

-- 
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] gdalwarp -dstalpha does not create alpha band

[jratike80]

Hi,

It does really work for others. I just verified with GDAL 3.1.0dev and 2.4.2
on Windows. Could you repeat the test carefully with the bare minimum

gdalwarp -dstalpha without_alpha.tif with_alpha.tif

If it does not work please arrange a reproducible test case for us by
telling how to get exactly same GDAL version as you have, and point same
source tiff file as input.

-Jukka Rahkonen-


Jack Glendening wrote
> For gdalwarp (GDAL 2.3.1), using -dstalpha (hoping to get transparent
> pixels outside the original image area) ala 
> 
>  gdalwarp -dstalpha -srcnodata 0 -t_srs EPSG:4326 in.tif out.tif 
> 
> for an input geotiff RGB image (created by gdal_translate) I get an RGB
> output image, not an RGBA as I expected. From googling, it appears
> -dstalpha works for others. This seems so simple, cannot understand
> what could be going wrong.
> 
> Jack 
> 
> 
> ___
> gdal-dev mailing list

> gdal-dev@.osgeo

> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev





--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] Refreshing GDAL's logo

[Even Rouault]

Hi,

So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't 
get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in 
the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
In https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117#issuecomment-570059241 , there's 
also a variant of nirvn_v3 with the compas/satellite replacing the A.

Thoughts ? (PSC and community)

Even

> Hi,
> 
> A number of people have expressed a wish to refresh GDAL's logo and have
> already submitted ideas in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117
> 
> In order to make the topic advance in a positive way, I suggest the
> following guidelines for an informal contest starting now:
> - Propositions must be added to the above ticket until February 8 any time
> zone. In the spirit of "release early release often", it is suggested that
> people don't wait until the deadline so as to benefit from community
> feedback and potentially improve their proposals.
> - Each proposition must be clearly associated with a "${person_name}_$
> {unique_id}" identifier so we can unambiguously reference propositions.
> - A same person can issue any number of propositions.
> - Community members are invited to express their preferences in the ticket.
> - PSC will have final word on adopting a proposition or keeping the current
> logo if no clear concensus emerges. I hope other PSC members have better
> visual judgment than me to evaluate propositions ;-)
> - The selected proposition will have to be ultimately released as SVG
> readable by FOSS tools. With a color & back-white version
> - The selected proposition will have to be ultimately licensed under CC0 /
> Public domain for the sake of simplicity of use. For due credit, the author
> will be more than welcome to indicate its authorship, typically in rdf
> metadata, as was done for the PROJ logo (*)
> - Perhaps I've forgotten rules that will be added later. Hence the informal
> contest :-)
> 
> Happy sketching,
> 
> Even
> 
> (*) https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OSGeo/PROJ/master/media/logo.svg
> 
> PS: I would have appreciated if someone else from the community had taken
> the lead on writing this email, as suggested in the ticket. Don't be shy.


-- 
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev