Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 15:46 + schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:29:40 +0100
Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com wrote:
AFAICT these changes don't seem to be in the 0.18 release:
http://geany-plugins.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/geany-plugins/branches/geany-plugins/geany-plugins-0.18/geanygdb/?pathrev=1043
Thanks Frank.
Concerning to this link the changes definitely are in Geany-Plugins
0.18. The last change I made concerning the mentioned issues above was
revision 916. The branch was created from 929. So everything should be
fine. :)
OK, but there were no changes since 0.17.1, right?
Since the 0.17.1 release got tagged in revision 863 (at least if [1] is
right) the above mentioned changes actually are changes between 0.17.1
and 0.18. Seems I've really missed to mention those changes somewhere
else? :s
I may be being dumb, but I can't find these changes in the 0.18
release.
No, you aren't.
The 0.18 branch IIUC was not created from trunk, but just copied from
the 0.17.1 tag.
This is exactly the point I didn't knew. I thought it was created from
trunk and my changes were included. I've missed reading the mail were it
was mentioned I would have to merge the changes myself into the branch.
If this is the correct way for a releasing procedure is another question
anyway.
You're right then, my changes are not included in the 0.18 release. I'm
very sorry for the confusion.
Before doing the next release we should talk about the releasing
procedure again and maybe write that down as some kind of releasing
guidelines, so that confused guys like me won't miss those... ;)
Regards,
Dominic
--
Dominic Hopf dma...@gmail.com
http://dominichopf.de/
Key Fingerprint:
A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
