Re: [Geany-devel] more project settings [multiple instance behaviour]
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:13:39 +0400% Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:17:38 +1000% Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 June 2010 03:11, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. Taking point from the proposition to merge the recent files, what do you think about considering the recent files a logical part of the file list, and load/save the open/recent file lists together? This way, we will have better/more recent files (one set for each project) without the need to override geany.conf on each file open/close. N.B. Since the list will be handled together, Project based session files will affect the recent file list too. Would suit me, depends on what other people think. This is a good alternative to global recent files list approach I described. I forgot a side note: this won't do for recent *projects* list. I think recent projects should be global. Though it won't prevent using the described approach for recent *files*. Per-project interface settings (mostly the interface layout) seems reasonable too IMHO. I have several programming projects, and the message window/side bar are very convinient for them. But for my other projects, one with XSMP documentation/snippets and another with BDF files, the message window/side bar are practically useless. Ditto. Not currently needed by me, but I'm sure it would be useful. As a side effect, if per-project recent files and interface settings are implemented, Eugene's sm will be able to restore the Geany-s state better. Isn't it time to make the two sm-s functionally more similar, so we could choose one based on the implementation only? Agree, that is part of what the list in the other thread was intended to do and why I was trying to define it in terms of user visible behaviour, so I'm all for this. The more similar the two versions are, the better. And, I agree, that would make it simpler to see their differences. Best regards, Eugene. ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] more project settings [multiple instance behaviour]
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:17:38 +1000% Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 June 2010 03:11, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. Taking point from the proposition to merge the recent files, what do you think about considering the recent files a logical part of the file list, and load/save the open/recent file lists together? This way, we will have better/more recent files (one set for each project) without the need to override geany.conf on each file open/close. N.B. Since the list will be handled together, Project based session files will affect the recent file list too. Would suit me, depends on what other people think. This is a good alternative to global recent files list approach I described. Per-project interface settings (mostly the interface layout) seems reasonable too IMHO. I have several programming projects, and the message window/side bar are very convinient for them. But for my other projects, one with XSMP documentation/snippets and another with BDF files, the message window/side bar are practically useless. Ditto. Not currently needed by me, but I'm sure it would be useful. As a side effect, if per-project recent files and interface settings are implemented, Eugene's sm will be able to restore the Geany-s state better. Isn't it time to make the two sm-s functionally more similar, so we could choose one based on the implementation only? Agree, that is part of what the list in the other thread was intended to do and why I was trying to define it in terms of user visible behaviour, so I'm all for this. The more similar the two versions are, the better. And, I agree, that would make it simpler to see their differences. Best regards, Eugene. ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Re: [Geany-devel] more project settings [multiple instance behaviour]
On 4 June 2010 03:11, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. Taking point from the proposition to merge the recent files, what do you think about considering the recent files a logical part of the file list, and load/save the open/recent file lists together? This way, we will have better/more recent files (one set for each project) without the need to override geany.conf on each file open/close. N.B. Since the list will be handled together, Project based session files will affect the recent file list too. Would suit me, depends on what other people think. Per-project interface settings (mostly the interface layout) seems reasonable too IMHO. I have several programming projects, and the message window/side bar are very convinient for them. But for my other projects, one with XSMP documentation/snippets and another with BDF files, the message window/side bar are practically useless. Ditto. As a side effect, if per-project recent files and interface settings are implemented, Eugene's sm will be able to restore the Geany-s state better. Isn't it time to make the two sm-s functionally more similar, so we could choose one based on the implementation only? Agree, that is part of what the list in the other thread was intended to do and why I was trying to define it in terms of user visible behaviour, so I'm all for this. Cheers Lex -- E-gards: Jimmy ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
