Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-06

[Vishnu Pavan Beeram]

Russ, Hi!

Much Thanks for the review! We just posted a new rev (-07) to address your
comments. Please do go through the diffs (
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-07.txt)
and let us know if the new version adequately addresses your concern.

The term "loose hop" was introduced in RFC3209. So we just added a
reference to it in the relevant sentence.

Regards,
-Pavan (on behalf of the authors)

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 1:29 PM Russ Housley  wrote:

> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> .
>
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-06
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2018-11-30
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-11
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>
> Summary: Ready
>
>
> Major Concerns:
>
> None
>
>
> Minor Concerns:
>
> Section 5.3: To understand this section, I had to learn about "loose
> hops" from other sources.  Please consider adding this term to the ones
> that are defined in Section 2.
>
>
> Nits:
>
> Throughout document: s/hop by hop/hop-by-hop/
>
> Section 5.3.1: s/The net result is that by/As a result, by/
>
> ___
> mpls mailing list
> m...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03

[Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)]

Paul -

Thanx for the careful review and the kind words.

   Les


> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Kyzivat 
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2018 12:06 PM
> To: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis@ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team 
> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other
> last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03
> Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
> Review Date: 2018-12-09
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-12
> IESG Telechat date: ?
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.
> 
> Issues: None
> 
> It was very easy to review this document because a diff with RFC7810
> showed me everything of note, and this was consistent with Appendix A.
> 
> Changing an RFC in a way that is not backwards compatible is
> problematic, but the authors have clearly considered the issues and find
> this the best of bad alternatives.
> 
> The reference to draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14 is now out of date. I'm not
> raising it as a nit because chasing references to drafts is futile and
> this will be fixed by the editor.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03

[Paul Kyzivat]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area 
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other 
last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at 
<​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.


Document: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2018-12-09
IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-12
IESG Telechat date: ?

Summary:

This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.

Issues: None

It was very easy to review this document because a diff with RFC7810 
showed me everything of note, and this was consistent with Appendix A.


Changing an RFC in a way that is not backwards compatible is 
problematic, but the authors have clearly considered the issues and find 
this the best of bad alternatives.


The reference to draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14 is now out of date. I'm not 
raising it as a nit because chasing references to drafts is futile and 
this will be fixed by the editor.


___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art