[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-plc-06

[Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker]

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

.

Document: draft-ietf-6lo-plc-06
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2021-08-09
IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-15
IESG Telechat date: 2021-08-12

Summary: This draft is almost ready to be published as Standards Track RFC, no
more comments than those mentioned on the list.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
Section 1, "Efficient"->"efficient"
Section 4.4, "Solicitaitons"->"Solicitations"
Section 4.6, "octects"->"octets"; "constranied"->"constrained" ;
"fragements"->"fragments" Section 6, "aming"->"aiming"


___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04

[Ines Robles via Datatracker]

Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

.

Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2021-08-09
IETF LC End Date: 2021-08-09
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

The document defines a new Session Description Protocol (SDP) Grouping
Framework extension called 'BUNDLE'.

The document obsoletes RFC8843 (published  on Jan 2021) by removing the
inconsistency between RFC 8843 and RFC8829.  - The procedures regarding
assigning the port value to a bundled "m=" section in an answer and instead use
the same port for all bundled "m=" sections; some (initial or subsequent) and a
subsequent offer were inconsistent. This specification removes the
inconsistency by aligning the port value assignment procedure with the
procedure in RFC 8829.-

This specification updates also RFCs 3264, 5888, and 7941.

Major issues:  Not found

Minor issues: Not found

Nits/editorial comments: Not found

Thanks for this document,

Ines



___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art