Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

[Alissa Cooper]

Ines, thanks for your review. Michael, Russ, thanks for your responses. I 
entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Jul 13, 2020, at 2:52 AM, Ines Robles 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Yes, that would be great, if possible.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ines
> 
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:56 AM Michael Richardson  > wrote:
> 
> Ines Robles via Datatracker mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> 
> wrote:
> > 2- Introduction: "reports from implementers suggest" It would be 
> nice to add
> > reference/s here
> 
> Well, I'm not sure how I can add a reference to private emails.
> I can ask the implementers to write a public email if that is intended.
> Please advise.
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson mailto:mcr%2bi...@sandelman.ca>>, 
> Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

[Ines Robles]

Hi Michael,

Yes, that would be great, if possible.

Thank you,

Ines

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:56 AM Michael Richardson 
wrote:

>
> Ines Robles via Datatracker  wrote:
> > 2- Introduction: "reports from implementers suggest..." It would be
> nice to add
> > reference/s here
>
> Well, I'm not sure how I can add a reference to private emails.
> I can ask the implementers to write a public email if that is intended.
> Please advise.
>
>
> --
> Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
>
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

[Michael Richardson]

Ines Robles via Datatracker  wrote:
> 1- It would be nice to add in Terminology section that the document uses 
the
> terminology of RFC7030 and RFC5272

> 2- Introduction: "reports from implementers suggest..." It would be nice 
to add
> reference/s here

> 3- Security Considerations:

> It would be nice to add smth like "security considerations from RFC7030 
applies
> also for the clarifications described in this document."

done.

> 5- IANA Considerations:
> It would be nice to add the specific registry that IANA should update.
> For example, instead of "IANA is requested to update the "Reference" 
column for
> the Asymmetric Decryption Key Identifier attribute to also include a 
reference
> to
> this document." you could add smth like (if applicable): " IANA is 
requested
> to update the registry SMI Security for S/MIME Attributes
> (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.2) "
> with the reference of this document as follows:

> Decimal - Description   -Reference
> 54  id-aa-asymmDecryptKeyID  [RFC7030] [ThisDocument]

> 4- Appendix A: In id-aa-asymmDecryptKeyID OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {...}

> 4.1-   pkcs9(9) should be pkcs-9(9) ?

I have done this as per Russ Housley's suggestion.

> 4.2-   aa(2) should be id-aa(2) ?

I have not done this.

This is in version -09.

--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

[Michael Richardson]

Ines Robles via Datatracker  wrote:
> 2- Introduction: "reports from implementers suggest..." It would be nice 
to add
> reference/s here

Well, I'm not sure how I can add a reference to private emails.
I can ask the implementers to write a public email if that is intended.
Please advise.


--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-





signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art