Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09

[Alissa Cooper]

Elwyn, thanks for your review. Duane, thanks for your response. I entered a No 
Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Sep 14, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Wessels, Duane 
>  wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure why received messages in this thread are being truncated.  The 
> archive 
> has my full response here:
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/MVl2P81bCi6d5l1QhuNluJZB52g/
> 
> DW
> 
> ___
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09

[Wessels, Duane]

I'm not sure why received messages in this thread are being truncated.  The 
archive 
has my full response here:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/MVl2P81bCi6d5l1QhuNluJZB52g/

DW



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09

[Wessels, Duane]

Hi Elwyn,

Thanks for the review!

> On Sep 12, 2020, at 3:09 PM, Elwyn Davies via Datatracker  
> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> .
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09
> Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
> Review Date: 2020-09-12
> IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: Ready with  few nits.
> 
> Major issues:
> None

(Your original email was truncated around here but I "repaired" it with what I 
found at 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09-genart-lc-davies-2020-09-12/)

> 
> Minor Issues:
> s2.3:  The example of the presenation format shown in s2.4 has the sequence 
> of hex digits representing the Digest surrounded in parentheses.  This is not 
> specified in s2.3.  Which is right?

The use of parentheses for continuation of long lines is a long-standing 
feature of DNS record presentation described in RFC 1035 (sec 5.1).

> 
> Nits and Editorial:
> 
> s1, para 2: s/verification the zone as a whole/verification of the zone as a 
> whole/

Fixed.

> 
> s1.1, last para: s/aka AXFR SIG/identified as the AXFR SIG/

Fixed.

> 
> s3.1, para 4:  I think this should be RECOMMENDED.

Yes, this was also identified in the SECDIR review and I've made the change.

> 
> s9:  I have a suspiscion that you mean David Black rather than David Blacka.

David Blacka is a colleague of mine at Verisign and coauthor of several RFCs:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search_detail.php?pubstatus%5B%5D=Any_date_type=any=Blacka

DW




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09

[Elwyn Davies via Datatracker]

Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

.

Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 2020-09-12
IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready with  few nits.

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
s3.3:  The
Nits/editorial comments:



___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art