Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24

[Alissa Cooper]

Pete, thank you for your reviews of this document. Dino, thank you for 
addressing Pete’s comment. I have entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Feb 5, 2019, at 9:43 PM, Pete Resnick  wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> .
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review Date: 2019-02-05
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-08-31
> IESG Telechat date: 2019-02-07
> 
> Summary:
> 
> The changes made to this version look fine to me. No concerns save the 
> editorial comment below.
> 
> Major issues: None.
> 
> Minor issues: None.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: Section 2: Get rid of everything except the last 
> paragraph.
> 
> 
> ___
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24

[Dino Farinacci]

Okay. I will keep the last paragraph only. Thanks. 

Dino

> On Feb 5, 2019, at 7:59 PM, Benjamin Kaduk  wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:56:39PM -0800, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>> Nits/editorial comments: Section 2: Get rid of everything except the last 
>>> paragraph.
>> 
>> Are you sure? I just followed what RFC 8174 suggested. Give me reason to not 
>> follow it?
> 
> Yes, he's sure.
> 
> You pasted the text that 8174 inserted into 2119, when all you need is the
> bit after "Authors who follow these guidelines should incorporate this
> phrase near the beginning of their document:"
> 
> -Benjamin

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24

[Benjamin Kaduk]

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:56:39PM -0800, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> > Nits/editorial comments: Section 2: Get rid of everything except the last 
> > paragraph.
> 
> Are you sure? I just followed what RFC 8174 suggested. Give me reason to not 
> follow it?

Yes, he's sure.

You pasted the text that 8174 inserted into 2119, when all you need is the
bit after "Authors who follow these guidelines should incorporate this
phrase near the beginning of their document:"

-Benjamin

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24

[Dino Farinacci]

> Nits/editorial comments: Section 2: Get rid of everything except the last 
> paragraph.

Are you sure? I just followed what RFC 8174 suggested. Give me reason to not 
follow it?

Dino
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24

[Pete Resnick]

Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

.

Document: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review Date: 2019-02-05
IETF LC End Date: 2018-08-31
IESG Telechat date: 2019-02-07

Summary:

The changes made to this version look fine to me. No concerns save the 
editorial comment below.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues: None.

Nits/editorial comments: Section 2: Get rid of everything except the last 
paragraph.


___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art