Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11

[Jari Arkko]

Elwyn, Christer — many thanks for the in-depth review and updates.

I have posted a “no objection” position for this document for tomorrow’s
IESG telechat.

Jari



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11

[Christer Holmberg]

Hi Elwyn,

>That's all fine.  Re s4, para 2: First, i realised I missed another instance 
>of 'new' in the abstract.
>I think that 'the' is correct in the new [sic] version in both places.  It's 
>pernickety but when it was
>'a new' what you have is shorthand for "a new protocol identifier to be called 
>'TCP/TLS'..."  (an
>addition to the existng list) whereas because the identifier is no longer new 
>we now have "the protocol
>identifier [named] 'TCP/TLS'...".

My suggestion was to drop “new”, but to keep “a”:

“a protocol identifier, 'TCP/TLS', which…”

But, I’m fine using “the” :)

Regards,

Christer



Sent from Samsung tablet.

 Original message 
From: Christer Holmberg 
>
Date: 25/01/2017 13:40 (GMT+00:00)
To: Elwyn Davies >, 
gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: 
draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update@ietf.org,
 i...@ietf.org, mmu...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11

Hi Elwyn,

Thanks for your review! See inline.

Nits/editorial comments:

>s1, para 2: s/TLS protocol/The TLS protocol/ (as per RFC 4572)

I will fix as suggested.


>s4, para 2: s/a new protocol identifier/the protocol identifier/ (it
>isn't new any more)

I am happy to remove ³new², but doesn¹t ³a² still sound better than ³the²?


>s5.1: Suggest s/m- line/"m" line/  for consistency with s3.4

I will replace with single quotes (Œm¹), for consistency with s3.4 and s4.


>s5.1, para 1: s/e.g./e.g.,/

I will fix as suggested.


>s5.1, para 4: s/that each used certificate matches/that each
>certificate used matches/

I will fix as suggested.


>s5.1, para 5: s/each used certificate matches/each certificate used
>matches/

I will fix as suggested.

>s8, para 5: ' This specification creates a new IANA registry named
>"Hash Function Textual Names".'
>The registry is no longer new.  Perhaps s/creates a new IANA
>registry/takes over the IANA registry from RFC 4572/

I suggest:

"This specification takes over the IANA registry named "Hash Function
Textual Names², that was created in RFC 4572.  It will not be part of
the SDP Parameters.²


Regards,

Christer
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11

[Elwyn Davies]

Hi, Christer.
Thanks for the rapid response.
That's all fine.  Re s4, para 2: First, i realised I missed another instance of 
'new' in the abstract.  I think that 'the' is correct in the new [sic] version 
in both places.  It's pernickety but when it was 'a new' what you have is 
shorthand for "a new protocol identifier to be called 'TCP/TLS'..."  (an 
addition to the existng list) whereas because the identifier is no longer new 
we now have "the protocol identifier [named] 'TCP/TLS'...".   
Cheers,Elwyn
Sent from Samsung tablet.
 Original message From: Christer Holmberg 
 Date: 25/01/2017  13:40  (GMT+00:00) To: Elwyn 
Davies , gen-art@ietf.org Cc: 
draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update@ietf.org, i...@ietf.org, mmu...@ietf.org 
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11 
Hi Elwyn,

Thanks for your review! See inline.

Nits/editorial comments:

>s1, para 2: s/TLS protocol/The TLS protocol/ (as per RFC 4572)

I will fix as suggested.


>s4, para 2: s/a new protocol identifier/the protocol identifier/ (it
>isn't new any more)

I am happy to remove ³new², but doesn¹t ³a² still sound better than ³the²?


>s5.1: Suggest s/m- line/"m" line/  for consistency with s3.4

I will replace with single quotes (Œm¹), for consistency with s3.4 and s4.


>s5.1, para 1: s/e.g./e.g.,/

I will fix as suggested.


>s5.1, para 4: s/that each used certificate matches/that each
>certificate used matches/

I will fix as suggested.


>s5.1, para 5: s/each used certificate matches/each certificate used
>matches/

I will fix as suggested.

>s8, para 5: ' This specification creates a new IANA registry named
>"Hash Function Textual Names".'
>The registry is no longer new.  Perhaps s/creates a new IANA
>registry/takes over the IANA registry from RFC 4572/

I suggest:

 "This specification takes over the IANA registry named "Hash Function
 Textual Names², that was created in RFC 4572.  It will not be part of
 the SDP Parameters.²


Regards,

Christer

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art