Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03.txt

[Jari Arkko]

Thanks for your review, Francis. I see that the CDNI abbreviation has been 
expanded in a new draft version.

Jari

On 07 Oct 2015, at 17:26, Francis Dupont  wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> .
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 20151002
> IETF LC End Date: 20151013
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - In 1 page 2: the CDNI abbrev should be introduced (i.e., the Abstract
>  is considered as independent). Note that formally CDN and JSON abbrevs
>  should be introduced too but IMHO it is no necessary here.
> 
> - 2.1 page 3: RFCthis -> this RFC
> 
> - 3.1 page 5: the Nits checker complains the RFC2119 reference is unused.
> 
> BTW I saw the 04 version was published (without problematic changes
> rom 03).
> 
> Regards
> 
> francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
> 
> ___
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03.txt

[Francis Dupont]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

.

Document: draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20151002
IETF LC End Date: 20151013
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - In 1 page 2: the CDNI abbrev should be introduced (i.e., the Abstract
  is considered as independent). Note that formally CDN and JSON abbrevs
  should be introduced too but IMHO it is no necessary here.

 - 2.1 page 3: RFCthis -> this RFC

 - 3.1 page 5: the Nits checker complains the RFC2119 reference is unused.

BTW I saw the 04 version was published (without problematic changes
rom 03).

Regards

francis.dup...@fdupont.fr

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art