Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the day

[Gillian White]

I changed the image of a uniform example in the gallery of [[Neckline]] to
one showing the V-neckline in use by both sexes (and without the confusing
additional undershirt neckline). Hope that's more balanced, representative
and clear.
Gillian



On 18 September 2011 06:28, Emily Monroe  wrote:

> Holy...what?
>
> I don't know how to respond.
>
> From,
> Emily
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Arnaud HERVE wrote:
>
>>  By the way the Italian page shows porn model Aria Giovanni.
>>
>>
>> On 17/09/2011 18:31, Sarah Stierch wrote:
>>
>> Neckline!!
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neckline
>>
>> The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section.  One
>> of the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."
>>
>> :P
>>
>> --
>> GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia 
>> Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American 
>> Art
>> and
>> Sarah Stierch Consulting
>> *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
>> --
>> http://www.sarahstierch.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Gendergap mailing 
>> listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the, day

[Jeremy Baron]

ourmed.org (a MediaWiki wiki) is in NYC and they've come to several of
our meetups.
(wiki seems kinda dead or at least dormant; per their recentchanges,
they seem to have done spam and vandal fighting every day in the last
2 weeks but there's no actual content work for 2 weeks straight
AFAICT. of course, that's not really relevant to them having contacts
to help with this and I think there's a good chance they would have
some.)

Their director is GMiller1965 @ enwp. Let me or Pharos know if you'd
like us to make an introduction.

-Jeremy

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:09, Nicole Willson
 wrote:
> There are some medical wikis out there that might be good to collaborate
> with:
> http://askdrwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Physician_Medical_Wiki
> http://www.medpedia.com/ - This one looks like they also have a Quora like
> system that lets you ask questions.
> If those methods don't work, I know a gyno I could contact.
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Sarah Stierch 
> wrote:
>>
>> Anyone know a medical doctor/gyno who can perhaps provide some type of
>> documentation/review of the content?
>> Not sure if it would ever matter...but, a solid letter and such could help
>> maybe..
>> I haven't looked at the article, I admit, it's a subject I'm not
>> comfortable "examining"
>> Another example of why medical support could be beneficial to Wikipedia as
>> a whole.
>> Sarah (Stierch)

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the, day

[Nicole Willson]

There are some medical wikis out there that might be good to collaborate
with:

http://askdrwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Physician_Medical_Wiki

http://www.medpedia.com/ - This one looks like they also have a Quora like
system that lets you ask questions.

If those methods don't work, I know a gyno I could contact.

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:

> Anyone know a medical doctor/gyno who can perhaps provide some type of
> documentation/review of the content?
>
> Not sure if it would ever matter...but, a solid letter and such could help
> maybe..
>
> I haven't looked at the article, I admit, it's a subject I'm not
> comfortable "examining"
>
> Another example of why medical support could be beneficial to Wikipedia as
> a whole.
>
> Sarah (Stierch)
>
>
> Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:51 PM, The Richardsons 
> wrote:
>
> On 9/17/2011 3:00 PM,
>
> Sarah Stierch
>
> wrote:
>
> The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section.  One of
> the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."
>
>
> I saw that “boobies.jpg” was changed to “Cleavage (breasts).jpg” about four
> hours ago by Mattbuck. +1 for Gendergap!
> That was the good news
> The bad news is that, from earlier posts about labiaplasty, it seemed that
> users wanted to remove the picture from the page, but that others put it
> back up. What I believe is that you had no right to take the picture off
> without consensus. Please excuse me if I missed something that would prove
> that there was consensus otherwise. Again, though, what troubles me is that
> SlimVirgin did get talked to rudely, being mockingly (in my opinion) called
> an “Administratrix” and being told to  “play by the rules you claim to
> enforce”. Also, you seem to be right in saying that the picture isn’t a
> “hypertrophy” (although I wouldn’t know) and I am pleased to see that a note
> was added early this morning UTC.
>
> But my main problem is how we get to reach a consensus on this, by,
> which we certainly can, by questioning its “licensed medical image” status,
> pointing out that it is two different people, and pointing out that the
> labia minora are not hypertrophies.
>
>  --- RDW2210
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>


-- 
"Only the shallow know themselves." - Oscar Wilde
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the, day

[Sydney Poore]

I requested the name change for Boobies.jpg today, and was pleased to see
that Mattbuck did it quickly. :-)

Sydney

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:51 PM, The Richardsons wrote:

>  On 9/17/2011 3:00 PM,
>
> Sarah Stierch
>
> wrote:
>
> The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section.  One of
> the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."
>
>
> I saw that “boobies.jpg” was changed to “Cleavage (breasts).jpg” about four
> hours ago by Mattbuck. +1 for Gendergap!
> That was the good news
> The bad news is that, from earlier posts about labiaplasty, it seemed that
> users wanted to remove the picture from the page, but that others put it
> back up. What I believe is that you had no right to take the picture off
> without consensus. Please excuse me if I missed something that would prove
> that there was consensus otherwise. Again, though, what troubles me is that
> SlimVirgin did get talked to rudely, being mockingly (in my opinion) called
> an “Administratrix” and being told to  “play by the rules you claim to
> enforce”. Also, you seem to be right in saying that the picture isn’t a
> “hypertrophy” (although I wouldn’t know) and I am pleased to see that a note
> was added early this morning UTC.
>
> But my main problem is how we get to reach a consensus on this, by,
> which we certainly can, by questioning its “licensed medical image” status,
> pointing out that it is two different people, and pointing out that the
> labia minora are not hypertrophies.
>
>  --- RDW2210
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the, day

[The Richardsons]

On 9/17/2011 3:00 PM,

Sarah Stierch

wrote:

The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section.  One of
the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."


I saw that "boobies.jpg" was changed to "Cleavage (breasts).jpg" about 
four hours ago by Mattbuck. +1 for Gendergap!

That was the good news
The bad news is that, from earlier posts about labiaplasty, it seemed 
that users wanted to remove the picture from the page, but that others 
put it back up. What I believe is that you had no right to take the 
picture off without consensus. Please excuse me if I missed something 
that would prove that there was consensus otherwise. Again, though, what 
troubles me is that SlimVirgin did get talked to rudely, being mockingly 
(in my opinion) called an "Administratrix" and being told to  "play by 
the rules you claim to enforce". Also, you seem to be right in saying 
that the picture isn't a "hypertrophy" (although I wouldn't know) and I 
am pleased to see that a note was added early this morning UTC.


But my main problem is how we get to reach a consensus on this, by, 
which we certainly can, by questioning its "licensed medical image" 
status, pointing out that it is two different people, and pointing out 
that the labia minora are not hypertrophies.


 --- RDW2210
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the day

[Emily Monroe]

Holy...what?

I don't know how to respond.

From,
Emily


On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Arnaud HERVE wrote:

>  By the way the Italian page shows porn model Aria Giovanni.
>
>
> On 17/09/2011 18:31, Sarah Stierch wrote:
>
> Neckline!!
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neckline
>
> The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section.  One of
> the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."
>
> :P
>
> --
> GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia 
> Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American 
> Art
> and
> Sarah Stierch Consulting
> *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
> --
> http://www.sarahstierch.com/
>
>
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing 
> listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the day

[Arnaud HERVE]

By the way the Italian page shows porn model Aria Giovanni.

On 17/09/2011 18:31, Sarah Stierch wrote:

Neckline!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neckline

The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section.  
One of the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."


:P

--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia 
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art 


and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
/Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising./
--
http://www.sarahstierch.com/



___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

[Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the day

[Sarah Stierch]

Neckline!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neckline

The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section.  One of
the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."

:P

-- 
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia 
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Art
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
--
http://www.sarahstierch.com/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap