Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread Béria Lima
Let's not reinvent the wheel, shall we?

A group like Maggie described already exist - for years - under the name
Wikichix-l (see
http://lists.modernthings.org/listinfo.cgi/wikichix-l-modernthings.org )

Is a mailing list who exist since December
2006http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LSS/foundation-l-archives/2006_12_03-09and
the sumary of creation was 
*Angela Beesley announced the creation of a mailing
listhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikichix-land
Wiki http://wikichix.org/ for female WMF-projects editors to discuss
gender bias and ways to make the projects more inviting for women.
Discussion followed on whether this is a positive development, and whether a
number of other divisions will (or should) spring up after this.*
_
*Béria Lima*
Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt
(351) 963 953 042

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer.*


On 2 October 2011 04:51, Lika Tika likatikalikat...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 This is my first time contributing to this list. First, I'd like to say
 that I don't think it's inappropriate to create an optional women only
 space. As Maggie mentioned, she is not interested in replacing this
 discussion. Protected spaces for minorities may be useful, especially
 considering the atmosphere sometimes present in this project.

 I do think it's interesting that men have repeatedly told the women in this
 discussion to essentially pipe down, or that they're doing things all wrong.
 Not that it might not be true, but they have certainly gone about it in a
 way that comes dangerously close to 'mansplaining.'

 Thanks for the invite, Maggie, I'll be joining you.

 Lika

 On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Marc Riddell 
 michaeldavi...@comcast.netwrote:

  on 10/1/11 7:37 PM, Maggie at rockerre...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've created this group as a women's-only group to discuss things without
 being inhibited by a male presence,

 Maggie,

 ...inhibited by a male presence [?] Isn't this a personal issue that, I
 hope, each person would want to address within themselves; instead of
 joining a group that merely enables  facilitates it?

 If the goal is to more solidly bridge the gap between the genders in the
 project - this is definitely not the way to go about it.

 Marc Riddell



 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread Béria Lima
I'm there for months and I must say is a pretty quiet mailing list.

And we have around 60 members.
No dia 2 de Out de 2011 09:32, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
escreveu:

 On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt
 wrote:
  Let's not reinvent the wheel, shall we?
 
  A group like Maggie described already exist - for years - under the name
  Wikichix-l (see
  http://lists.modernthings.org/listinfo.cgi/wikichix-l-modernthings.org )
 
  Is a mailing list who exist since December 2006 and the sumary of
 creation
  was Angela Beesley announced the creation of a mailing list and Wiki for
  female WMF-projects editors to discuss gender bias and ways to make the
  projects more inviting for women. Discussion followed on whether this is
 a
  positive development, and whether a number of other divisions will (or
  should) spring up after this.

 would it be possible for wikichix-l to give a summary or stats of
 activity on the list (number of active participants, etc)?

 --
 John Vandenberg

 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread John Vandenberg
Have wikichix-l talked about possible solutions to the gender gap?

-- 
John Vandenberg

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread Béria Lima
I'm not sure if I can talk about wikichix-l here (since is a private ml
after all). Let me ask them and them I come to you with a answer :)
_
*Béria Lima*
Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt
(351) 963 953 042

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer.*


On 2 October 2011 09:56, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:

 Have wikichix-l talked about possible solutions to the gender gap?

 --
 John Vandenberg

 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread Risker
The reason you can't find the archives is that it is a non-archiving list,
and there are none.

I too have been a member of this list for many years. It is used
infrequently, and I believe its intention was to draw issues of interest to
women editors to their attention, and to provide support to women who were
encountering onwiki challenges; however, my overall impression is that at
least for the last few years it has not been terribly active. There's no
blame associated with that statement: many of the women on the list spend
much of their wiki-time focusing on broader issues, and it's easy to forget
posting to a smaller list when one is active on multiple other lists, or is
busy working in a particular area that doesn't appear to be particularly
interesting to women as a group.


As I recall, there was also some debate a while back about whether or not
trans women should be included in the list that created some dissent.
Ultimately, I believe it was decided they could participate; in fact, my
introduction to the list was from a trans woman.

Risker/Anne

On 2 October 2011 10:46, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:

 You can go here and look:

 http://wikichix.org/wiki/WikiChix

 But you also can't access that. The funny thing is that I'm am member on
 the list but I'm not a member on the website and a you can't join unless you
 state you are a woman in your application.

 Again, I haven't been able to access the archives since I've been a member,
 and I've never seen a post. I think it's been circumvented with the creation
 of this mailing list. I joined the list out of curiosity when the gender
 gap storm struck to see if anything was taking place.

 Angela is still an active editor, I just spoke to her recently.

 -Sarah



 On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.ptwrote:

 I'm not sure if I can talk about wikichix-l here (since is a private ml
 after all). Let me ask them and them I come to you with a answer :)
 _
 *Béria Lima*
 Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt
 (351) 963 953 042

 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
 livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que
 estamos a fazer.*


 On 2 October 2011 09:56, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:

 Have wikichix-l talked about possible solutions to the gender gap?

 --
 John Vandenberg

 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap




 --
 GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org
 Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American 
 Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
 and
 Sarah Stierch Consulting
 *Historical, cultural  artistic research  advising.*
 --
 http://www.sarahstierch.com/


 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia Group

2011-10-02 Thread Maggie
@Sarah
If the woman on the list would prefer it to be private, I have no
problem with that. I just didn't want it to seem like we were trying
to hide anything. I am really familiar with all the issues in the
gender community, and I know how feminism has tended to exclude
non-white, disabled, or different gendered women in in the past. I
would like the atmosphere to feel as inviting as possible. Trans*,
genderqueer, intersex, whatever-it's all good.

--Maggie
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


[Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-01 Thread Maggie
I've created this group as a women's-only group to discuss things without
being inhibited by a male presence, if anyone is interested in joining. This
group was not created with the goal of competing with Gender Gap, more as a
companion or a friendly place for women to discuss their views. I would
suggest this group in addition to Gender Gap rather than an
alternative--because there are valid opinions to be heard all over.

http://groups.google.com/group/womenonwikimedia

--Maggie
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-01 Thread Marc Riddell
on 10/1/11 7:37 PM, Maggie at rockerre...@gmail.com wrote:

I've created this group as a women's-only group to discuss things without
being inhibited by a male presence,

Maggie,

...inhibited by a male presence [?] Isn't this a personal issue that, I
hope, each person would want to address within themselves; instead of
joining a group that merely enables  facilitates it?

If the goal is to more solidly bridge the gap between the genders in the
project - this is definitely not the way to go about it.

Marc Riddell


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-01 Thread Nathan
A resurrection of the previous most controversial discussion topic on
this list. Personally I don't have a problem with it if women want a
women-only place to discuss gender gap issues (although there are some
immediate challenges: (1) this is the Internet, and (2) some might
argue that male/female is an incomplete gender spectrum). On the other
hand... In order to effect change and be more than an echo chamber,
you might need the other 91% of us.

~Nathan

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-01 Thread Lika Tika
Hi,

This is my first time contributing to this list. First, I'd like to say that
I don't think it's inappropriate to create an optional women only space. As
Maggie mentioned, she is not interested in replacing this discussion.
Protected spaces for minorities may be useful, especially considering the
atmosphere sometimes present in this project.

I do think it's interesting that men have repeatedly told the women in this
discussion to essentially pipe down, or that they're doing things all wrong.
Not that it might not be true, but they have certainly gone about it in a
way that comes dangerously close to 'mansplaining.'

Thanks for the invite, Maggie, I'll be joining you.

Lika

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Marc Riddell michaeldavi...@comcast.netwrote:

  on 10/1/11 7:37 PM, Maggie at rockerre...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've created this group as a women's-only group to discuss things without
 being inhibited by a male presence,

 Maggie,

 ...inhibited by a male presence [?] Isn't this a personal issue that, I
 hope, each person would want to address within themselves; instead of
 joining a group that merely enables  facilitates it?

 If the goal is to more solidly bridge the gap between the genders in the
 project - this is definitely not the way to go about it.

 Marc Riddell



 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap