cvs commit: gump/project antworks-importer.xml

2004-03-21 Thread nickchalko
nickchalko2004/03/21 23:27:23

  Modified:project  antworks-importer.xml
  Log:
  Get jar from the dist dir.
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.4   +1 -1  gump/project/antworks-importer.xml
  
  Index: antworks-importer.xml
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/gump/project/antworks-importer.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.3
  retrieving revision 1.4
  diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
  --- antworks-importer.xml 20 Mar 2004 00:59:04 -  1.3
  +++ antworks-importer.xml 22 Mar 2004 07:27:23 -  1.4
  @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
   
   
   
  -
  +
   \
   
   

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-03-21 Thread gump
Dear Gumpmeisters,

The following 10 nags should have been sent

 G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: webwork/webwork failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: mx4j/mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: freemarker/freemarker failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-tapestry/ognl failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: javasrc/javasrc failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-xerces/xml-xerces1 failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-turbine-tdk/jakarta-turbine-tdk-docs failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: eyebrowse/eyebrowse failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jrefactory/jrefactory failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jgen/jgen failed
 G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: webwork/webwork failed
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help 
understanding the request please visit 
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project webwork has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 
projects, and has been outstanding for 2 runs. The current state is 'Failed', for 
reason 'Build Failed'

Full details are available at: 
http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/webwork/webwork.html, however some snippets follow:

-  -  -  -  - -- --  G U M P

Gump provided these annotations:

 - Info - Enable "verbose" output, due to 1 previous error(s).
 - Error - Failed with reason build failed


-  -  -  -  - -- --  G U M P
Gump performed this work:

Work Name: build_webwork_webwork (Type: Build)
State: Failed
Elapsed: 0 hours, 0 minutes, 22 seconds
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true -Dbuild.clonevm=true 
-Xbootclasspath/p:/data3/gump/xml-xerces2/java/build/xercesImpl.jar:/data3/gump/xml-xerces2/java/build/xmlParserAPIs.jar:/data3/gump/xml-xalan/java/build/xalan-unbundled.jar:/data3/gump/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar
 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -verbose 
-Dgump.merge=/data3/gump/gump-install/work/merge.xml -Dbuild.sysclasspath=only 
[Working Directory: /data3/gump/webwork]
-
[javac] 
/data3/gump/webwork/src/main/webwork/multipart/WebworkMultiPartRequest.java:69: cannot 
resolve symbol
[javac] symbol  : class MultipartListener 
[javac] location: class webwork.multipart.WebworkMultiPartRequest
[javac] MultipartListener listener = new MultipartListener()
[javac] ^
[javac] 
/data3/gump/webwork/src/main/webwork/multipart/WebworkMultiPartRequest.java:69: cannot 
resolve symbol
[javac] symbol  : class MultipartListener 
[javac] location: class webwork.multipart.WebworkMultiPartRequest
[javac] MultipartListener listener = new MultipartListener()
[javac]  ^
[javac] 
/data3/gump/webwork/src/main/webwork/multipart/WebworkMultiPartRequest.java:92: cannot 
resolve symbol
[javac] symbol  : class MultipartRequest 
[javac] location: class webwork.multipart.WebworkMultiPartRequest
[javac]   multi = new MultipartRequest(req.getContentType(),
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/data3/gump/webwork/src/main/webwork/multipart/WebworkMultiPartRequest.java:96: cannot 
resolve symbol
[javac] symbol  : variable MultipartRequest 
[javac] location: class webwork.multipart.WebworkMultiPartRequest
[javac]
MultipartRequest.IGNORE_FILES_IF_MAX_BYES_EXCEEDED,
[javac]^
[javac] 
/data3/gump/webwork/src/main/webwork/multipart/WebworkMultiPartRequest.java:102: 
cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol  : class MultipartRequest 
[javac] location: class webwork.multipart.WebworkMultiPartRequest
[javac]   multi = new MultipartRequest(req.getContentType(),
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/data3/gump/webwork/src/main/webwork/multipart/WebworkMultiPartRequest.java:107: 
cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol  : variable MultipartRequest 
[javac] location: class webwork.multipart.WebworkMultiPartRequest
[javac]
MultipartRequest.IGNORE_FILES_IF_MAX_BYES_EXCEEDED,
[javac]^
[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details.
[javac] 15 errors

BUILD FAILED
/data3/gump/webwork/build.xml:167: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for 
details.
at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Javac.compile(Javac.java:938)
at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Javac.execute(Javac.java:758)
at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:268)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:363)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:301)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:328)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.execut

Re: [VOTE] which OS for new gump machine?

2004-03-21 Thread Mark R. Diggory
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 21:43, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
> > The new IBM boxen arrived, and infrastructure@ will be installing them 
> > this week. There's been quite a bit of talk about which OS to run on the 
> > machine. From the looks of it, we're probably getting Red Hat Enterprise 
> > Linux v3 (RHEL3).
> > 
> > This is a quick vote to be sure we're in agreement that's a sane choice. 
> > Please place your votes:
> > 
> > [] Linux
> >[] RHEL
> >[] Debian
> > [] FreeBSD (probably 5.2.x)
> 
> My vote is for Debian.  I initially switched to Debian for my own 
> personal use when Red Hat end of lifed the non-Enterprise version of the 
> OS, but I quickly fell in love with apt-get.
> 
> If any help is needed administering this box, count me in.  I have some 
> prior experience in configuring Gump boxes, and would like to become 
> reacquainted with the Python branch.  ;-)
> 
> - Sam Ruby

Hmm, I went to Fedora after the EOL on Redhat 9 was announced, which
supports just about everything that was going on with the old Redhat
series. I think of it as Redhat 9.1. I'm quite happy with yum, up2date
and with the JPackage efforts, I can easily manage via rpm's the
installation of Java and many Apache Java projects with little to no
effort.

-Mark

-- 
Mark R. Diggory
Software Developer - VDC Project
Harvard MIT Data Center
http://www.hmdc.harvard.edu


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] which OS for new gump machine?

2004-03-21 Thread Sam Ruby
Leo Simons wrote:
The new IBM boxen arrived, and infrastructure@ will be installing them 
this week. There's been quite a bit of talk about which OS to run on the 
machine. From the looks of it, we're probably getting Red Hat Enterprise 
Linux v3 (RHEL3).

This is a quick vote to be sure we're in agreement that's a sane choice. 
Please place your votes:

[] Linux
   [] RHEL
   [] Debian
[] FreeBSD (probably 5.2.x)
My vote is for Debian.  I initially switched to Debian for my own 
personal use when Red Hat end of lifed the non-Enterprise version of the 
OS, but I quickly fell in love with apt-get.

If any help is needed administering this box, count me in.  I have some 
prior experience in configuring Gump boxes, and would like to become 
reacquainted with the Python branch.  ;-)

- Sam Ruby

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-jmeter.xml

2004-03-21 Thread sebb
sebb2004/03/21 18:13:13

  Modified:project  jakarta-jmeter.xml
  Log:
  excalibur-logger needs to be before avalon-excalibur
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.91  +18 -13gump/project/jakarta-jmeter.xml
  
  Index: jakarta-jmeter.xml
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/gump/project/jakarta-jmeter.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.90
  retrieving revision 1.91
  diff -u -r1.90 -r1.91
  --- jakarta-jmeter.xml22 Mar 2004 02:07:31 -  1.90
  +++ jakarta-jmeter.xml22 Mar 2004 02:13:13 -  1.91
  @@ -149,6 +149,9 @@
   
   
   
  +
  +
  +
   
   
   
  @@ -163,7 +166,6 @@
   
   
   
  -
   
   
   
  @@ -214,6 +216,9 @@
   
   
   
  +
  +
  +
   
   
   
  @@ -227,8 +232,6 @@
   
   
   
  -
  -
   
   
   
  @@ -273,6 +276,9 @@
   
   
   
  +
  +
  +
   
   
   
  @@ -286,7 +292,6 @@
   
   
   
  -
   
   
   
  
  
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-jmeter.xml

2004-03-21 Thread sebb
sebb2004/03/21 18:07:31

  Modified:project  jakarta-jmeter.xml
  Log:
  Adding excalibur-logger
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.90  +15 -9 gump/project/jakarta-jmeter.xml
  
  Index: jakarta-jmeter.xml
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/gump/project/jakarta-jmeter.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.89
  retrieving revision 1.90
  diff -u -r1.89 -r1.90
  --- jakarta-jmeter.xml21 Mar 2004 11:44:39 -  1.89
  +++ jakarta-jmeter.xml22 Mar 2004 02:07:31 -  1.90
  @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
   
   
   
  +
   
   
   
  @@ -162,6 +163,8 @@
   
   
   
  +
  +
   
   
   
  @@ -224,6 +227,8 @@
   
   
   
  +
  +
   
   
   
  @@ -281,6 +286,7 @@
   
   
   
  +
   
   
   
  
  
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] which OS for new gump machine?

2004-03-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Leo Simons wrote:

The new IBM boxen arrived, and infrastructure@ will be installing them 
this week. There's been quite a bit of talk about which OS to run on the 
machine. From the looks of it, we're probably getting Red Hat Enterprise 
Linux v3 (RHEL3).

This is a quick vote to be sure we're in agreement that's a sane choice. 
Please place your votes:

[] Linux
   [] RHEL
   [x] Debian
Debian.

[] FreeBSD (probably 5.2.x)
java support on freebsd sucks ass.

you don't have to vote if you have no clue or no preference. Please 
include rationale for choosing one over another...infrastructure may be 
interested...

In addition, understand infra may decide otherwise based on other 
concerns (like having to maintain only a finite amount of operating 
systems).

As an aside, any chance one or two of the gump peeps could get root on 
the gump box? We've found that to be very handy every now and then :-D
yes, that would be reduce some of the infrastructure concerns a lot.

--
Stefano.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: moof:gump/public and moof:gump/test

2004-03-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:

I think we need a test install on moof, to match the public install. Heck,
maybe we need a few tests. Here are my thoughts:
1) We have a unit test workspace that uses the unit test workspace, and runs
itself, and perhaps even the unit test script. This ought be blindingly
fast, since there are no contents in CVS|SVN for the  projects, so they
randomly fail. That said, it does a semi-reasonable code path coverage.
2) Better (and more work, or could be the same) we add more to a test set of
projects, perhaps in SVN (like we have gump-test-maven[12]) that have
content, but it is minimal. Again fast, and better 'cos it is more coverage.
Thoughts?

BTW: We could (until SVN is fixed) have a separate user id for each of
these.
what about gump user id for the time being?

--
Stefano.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: User id that runs Gump on moof (and LSD...)

2004-03-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:

BTW: Here is my request. For each person taking over a machine, please
document that machines config/set-up in the wiki. [I think Leo asked for
this in a JIRA entry.]
I strongly dislike the concept of having a machine owned by a single person.

I'm all in favor of creating the workgroup "gump" and let everybody be 
responsible for it on moof.

I also think that we should start thinking about a better way to do a 
gump federation.

ah, I also think that gump should not be a static webapp anymore.

--
Stefano.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [VOTE] which OS for new gump machine?

2004-03-21 Thread Leo Simons
Leo Simons wrote:
[+1] Linux
   [+1] RHEL
   [+1] Debian
[] FreeBSD (probably 5.2.x)
I'm afraid some java projects will fail to build on BSD because, 
basically, not that many people build for/on BSD. Also, I'm just a lot 
more familiar with linux myself.

Java support on RHEL is a little better than on debian I think; both 
Debian and RH will work well enough though. IMHO the distro choice is 
more of a concern for infra@ than it is for us.

--
cheers,
- Leo Simons

---
Weblog  -- http://leosimons.com/
IoC Component Glue  -- http://jicarilla.org/
Articles & Opinions -- http://articles.leosimons.com/
---
"We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but
 people wouldn't obey the rules."
-- Alan Bennett


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[VOTE] which OS for new gump machine?

2004-03-21 Thread Leo Simons
The new IBM boxen arrived, and infrastructure@ will be installing them 
this week. There's been quite a bit of talk about which OS to run on the 
machine. From the looks of it, we're probably getting Red Hat Enterprise 
Linux v3 (RHEL3).

This is a quick vote to be sure we're in agreement that's a sane choice. 
Please place your votes:

[] Linux
   [] RHEL
   [] Debian
[] FreeBSD (probably 5.2.x)
you don't have to vote if you have no clue or no preference. Please 
include rationale for choosing one over another...infrastructure may be 
interested...

In addition, understand infra may decide otherwise based on other 
concerns (like having to maintain only a finite amount of operating 
systems).

As an aside, any chance one or two of the gump peeps could get root on 
the gump box? We've found that to be very handy every now and then :-D

--
cheers,
- Leo Simons

---
Weblog  -- http://leosimons.com/
IoC Component Glue  -- http://jicarilla.org/
Articles & Opinions -- http://articles.leosimons.com/
---
"We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but
 people wouldn't obey the rules."
-- Alan Bennett


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: User id that runs Gump on moof (and LSD...)

2004-03-21 Thread Leo Simons
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Anybody know how to do a share cronjob any other way?
use a cronjob to update the crontab.


I hope that we can still get these.
with all the e-mail traffic, we really need to start putting that kind 
of stuff in places where it'll be found again.

--
cheers,
- Leo Simons

---
Weblog  -- http://leosimons.com/
IoC Component Glue  -- http://jicarilla.org/
Articles & Opinions -- http://articles.leosimons.com/
---
"We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but
 people wouldn't obey the rules."
-- Alan Bennett


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-jmeter.xml

2004-03-21 Thread sebb
sebb2004/03/21 03:44:39

  Modified:project  jakarta-jmeter.xml
  Log:
  Javadoc also needs httpclient
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.89  +14 -10gump/project/jakarta-jmeter.xml
  
  Index: jakarta-jmeter.xml
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/gump/project/jakarta-jmeter.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.88
  retrieving revision 1.89
  diff -u -r1.88 -r1.89
  --- jakarta-jmeter.xml20 Mar 2004 14:01:06 -  1.88
  +++ jakarta-jmeter.xml21 Mar 2004 11:44:39 -  1.89
  @@ -278,12 +278,16 @@
   
   
   
  +
  +
  +
  +
   
   
   
   
   
  -
  +
   
   
   
  
  
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]