Re: Bad date format in GUMP warnings

[Angelo Turetta]

Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Maybe when I googled for an SMTP spec I found a pre-Y2K one. I've updated
the code now. Thanks for the heads up, and please let us know if this isn't
resolved after my commit.
regards
Adam
I received the first GUMP message not tagged as spam yesterday (20 oct) 
 at 19:08PM (CEST) (at 11:33 CEST it was still not doing the right thing)

Thanks for your prompt fix.
Angelo.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bad date format in GUMP warnings

[Angelo Turetta]

I'm receiving GUMP failure warnings as a subscriber to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and I've ever wondered why spamassassin was tagging 
them as spam.

Today I looked at the actual checks they trigger, and found:
 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K  Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting
Of course I can lower the score spamassassin is giving to that rule, but 
I think the format for the 'Date:' header in mail messages should 
include 4 digit year. The currently generated Date is as follows:

---
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 04 22:35:31 PDT
---
Bye,
Angelo.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]