Re: [VOTE] Give Adam Jack root access to brutus

2004-08-02 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Lost the initial vote, so don't know if I already did, but here is my
+1..

Mvgr,
Martin

On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 16:28, Leo Simons wrote:
 Scott Sanders wrote:
  I would like to propose that Adam is given root privileges on brutus so 
  that he can 'scratch his itches' WRT gump infrastructure.
 
 +1
 
 MWUHAHAHAA!
 
 - LSD
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Mvgr,
Martin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Give Adam Jack root access to brutus

2004-07-29 Thread Nick Chalko
Scott Sanders wrote:
Doing this on general@ instead of pmc@, because of my own email 
issues.  PMC members only vote, please.

I know Adam is not a member, but I asked infrastructure, and they 
don't have a problem with it because it is already considered an 
insecure box.

I would like to propose that Adam is given root privileges on brutus 
so that he can 'scratch his itches' WRT gump infrastructure.

I am +1.  Adam has done more than enough to not be held back by us :)
+1 (and some one recommend Adam as a Member all ready)


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [VOTE] Give Adam Jack root access to brutus

2004-07-29 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me.

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:55:09 -0700, Nick Chalko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Scott Sanders wrote:
 
  Doing this on general@ instead of pmc@, because of my own email
  issues.  PMC members only vote, please.
 
  I know Adam is not a member, but I asked infrastructure, and they
  don't have a problem with it because it is already considered an
  insecure box.
 
  I would like to propose that Adam is given root privileges on brutus
  so that he can 'scratch his itches' WRT gump infrastructure.
 
  I am +1.  Adam has done more than enough to not be held back by us :)
 
 +1 (and some one recommend Adam as a Member all ready)
 
 
 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Give Adam Jack root access to brutus

2004-07-29 Thread Scott Sanders
Given 3 +1s, I have given it to Adam in a lazy consensus, I will revoke 
it if anyone has a problem with this.

Adam, don't screw up too much :)
Scott
On Jul 29, 2004, at 1:02 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 from me.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:55:09 -0700, Nick Chalko [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
Scott Sanders wrote:
Doing this on general@ instead of pmc@, because of my own email
issues.  PMC members only vote, please.
I know Adam is not a member, but I asked infrastructure, and they
don't have a problem with it because it is already considered an
insecure box.
I would like to propose that Adam is given root privileges on brutus
so that he can 'scratch his itches' WRT gump infrastructure.
I am +1.  Adam has done more than enough to not be held back by us :)
+1 (and some one recommend Adam as a Member all ready)


--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [VOTE] Give Adam Jack root access to brutus

2004-07-29 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Scott Sanders wrote:
Doing this on general@ instead of pmc@, because of my own email issues. 
 PMC members only vote, please.

I know Adam is not a member, but I asked infrastructure, and they don't 
have a problem with it because it is already considered an insecure box.

I would like to propose that Adam is given root privileges on brutus so 
that he can 'scratch his itches' WRT gump infrastructure.

I am +1.  Adam has done more than enough to not be held back by us :)
+1
--
Stefano.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature