Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-12 Thread Adam R. B. Jack

> Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> > 2) Restore the config such that http://brutus.apache.org/gump/{flavour}
goes
> > to /usr/local/gump/{flavour}/results.
>
> done (for public, jdk15 and test, not any "flavour").

Thanks, I've restored the config to write back to these places.

regards

Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-12 Thread Leo Simons
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
2) Restore the config such that http://brutus.apache.org/gump/{flavour} goes
to /usr/local/gump/{flavour}/results.
done (for public, jdk15 and test, not any "flavour").
- LSD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-10 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> > Hey, I spent so long on having Gump use Forrest 'cos I'm no GUI guy. The
> > style sheet is here, feel free to help me fix it:
> >
> > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/gump/template/xhtml/css/style.css
>
> I'm on it!

Thanks. Let me know if you need me to change the class attributes on
anything.

regards

Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-10 Thread Stephen McConnell
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Hey, I spent so long on having Gump use Forrest 'cos I'm no GUI guy. The
style sheet is here, feel free to help me fix it:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/gump/template/xhtml/css/style.css
I'm on it!
Cheers, Steve.
--
|---|
| Magic by Merlin   |
| Production by Avalon  |
|   |
| http://avalon.apache.org  |
|---|
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack

> The cycle time between updates of the web site was around 9 hours - gump
> was reporting about 5 hours for the run (so we are already seeing a big
> improvement on that aspect). In addition there is that mystery 4 hours
> between the end of the run and the appearance off documentation.

Not really, much of the leakage of memory (and hence the slow down) was the
web page generation. We still have some of that, but things are better. Now
the pages that are listed in the buildLog.html (updated every 5 projects or
so) is new. We (sub-optimally) redo the pages in a batch run at the end (so
we can document dependendees and such) but I'll whittle that down over time.

> > Still, it can do far far better. Multi-threading the CVS/SVN ought
reduce
> > the latency. The main problem (for no clear reason I can gather) still
seems
> > to be generating documentation.
>
> Just an observation - that way things are using the current setup is
> "for me" better.  Ok the docs are not a nice but what I can see
> immediately is the following:
>
>(a) a message saying "gump is running and it started at ..."
>(b) result as they unfold which gives me more time to hit the
>issue (e.g. I figure I've fixed james during the last run
>because I was able to access the info before the run had
>completed)

Yup, and one ought now get an e-mail notification at this point also (for
first time failures/state changes).

> Things I wasn't too impressed with was the dirty big red banner
> complaining about my subversion of build.sysclasspath which kind of made
> me cringe.
>
> :-)

Hey, I spent so long on having Gump use Forrest 'cos I'm no GUI guy. The
style sheet is here, feel free to help me fix it:

http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/gump/template/xhtml/css/style.css

>
> > Ever tried a targeted run?
>
> Nope - never.
> I'll leave that sort of thing to Niclas!
>
> > If one runs to (say) depot or something like this
> > (a trimmed stack), this thing flies. It is something that clogs up over
time
> > & I can't track it down (ok, haven't yet).
>
> Watching the interactive progress you get a feel for this as well - gump
> kicks off and rips though the early entries but things get progressively
> slower.  But the end of the run she's not showing the same degree
> enthusiasm!

Yup. We have 50 Mb (crazy I know, but it is 100K a project) of XML/DOM/model
in memory, and we seem to start off fine. We creep that up to 75 Mb and we
slow to a crawl. I don't think it is (exactly) the memory tree (although we
do keep adding to it, e.g. with results of executed commands) but something
is such clogging up. The page generation (DOM-like, and not a favourite of
many here) starts fast but ends slow, when there ought be no difference.

Hmm -- sometime I wonder if I ought turn off the garbage collector, or try
some optimizations. I keep meaning to seeif I can cope w/ comp.lang.python,
but I doubt I can w/ my network bandwidth.

Q: Has anybody thought of an ASF developers python mailing list? Just for
folks working in Python for ASF, be it MoinMoin extensions, or Gump, or ...

regards,

Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-09 Thread Stephen McConnell
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
3h 23m.
That's an improvement!
:-)

Daft, but I've not been paying attention (too painful to look) 
:-)
-- what was it before?
The cycle time between updates of the web site was around 9 hours - gump 
was reporting about 5 hours for the run (so we are already seeing a big 
improvement on that aspect). In addition there is that mystery 4 hours 
between the end of the run and the appearance off documentation.

Still, it can do far far better. Multi-threading the CVS/SVN ought reduce
the latency. The main problem (for no clear reason I can gather) still seems
to be generating documentation.
Just an observation - that way things are using the current setup is 
"for me" better.  Ok the docs are not a nice but what I can see 
immediately is the following:

  (a) a message saying "gump is running and it started at ..."
  (b) result as they unfold which gives me more time to hit the
  issue (e.g. I figure I've fixed james during the last run
  because I was able to access the info before the run had
  completed)
Things I wasn't too impressed with was the dirty big red banner 
complaining about my subversion of build.sysclasspath which kind of made 
me cringe.

:-)
Ever tried a targeted run? 
Nope - never.
I'll leave that sort of thing to Niclas!
If one runs to (say) depot or something like this
(a trimmed stack), this thing flies. It is something that clogs up over time
& I can't track it down (ok, haven't yet). 
Watching the interactive progress you get a feel for this as well - gump 
kicks off and rips though the early entries but things get progressively 
slower.  But the end of the run she's not showing the same degree 
enthusiasm!

I sometimes wonder if it is the
Python implementation, not Gumpy per se. Something to do with the number of
objects in memory. Sooner or later I'll find it.
:-)
Steve.

regards
Adam
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
|---|
| Magic by Merlin   |
| Production by Avalon  |
|   |
| http://avalon.apache.org  |
|---|
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> 3h 23m.
> That's an improvement!
> :-)

Daft, but I've not been paying attention (too painful to look) -- what was
it before?

Still, it can do far far better. Multi-threading the CVS/SVN ought reduce
the latency. The main problem (for no clear reason I can gather) still seems
to be generating documentation.

Ever tried a targeted run? If one runs to (say) depot or something like this
(a trimmed stack), this thing flies. It is something that clogs up over time
& I can't track it down (ok, haven't yet). I sometimes wonder if it is the
Python implementation, not Gumpy per se. Something to do with the number of
objects in memory. Sooner or later I'll find it.

regards

Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-09 Thread Stephen McConnell
3h 23m.
That's an improvement!
:-)
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Until we can get a config change, I've (1) shutdown tomcat (2) reconfigured
to sue these addresses:
Note the ~ character.
http://brutus.apache.org/~gump/public/
http://brutus.apache.org/~gump/jdk15/
http://brutus.apache.org/~gump/test/
For example:
http://brutus.apache.org/~gump/public/buildLog.html
regards
Adam
--
|---|
| Magic by Merlin   |
| Production by Avalon  |
|   |
| http://avalon.apache.org  |
|---|
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Until we can get a config change, I've (1) shutdown tomcat (2) reconfigured
to sue these addresses:

Note the ~ character.

http://brutus.apache.org/~gump/public/
http://brutus.apache.org/~gump/jdk15/
http://brutus.apache.org/~gump/test/

For example:

http://brutus.apache.org/~gump/public/buildLog.html

regards

Adam
- Original Message - 
From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gump code and data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: brutus may be having a problem


> Darn, seems I picked a day to get stuck behind a config change, when Leo
is
> able to help out quickly. Hmm. We are getting HTML in {flavour}/results
but
> they aren't visible. :(
>
> Can anybody help me out with this, I'd like to ensure that this release is
> working as well as the old (I found one delete issue), if not better.
>
> If I don't get a response shortly I'll give a go at using XDOCs again.
>
> regards,
>
> Adam
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gump code and data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:27 PM
> Subject: Re: brutus may be having a problem
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/modules.html
> > >
> >
> > Yup, maybe my merge has some kinks to work out. Still, Leo (or other),
> could
> > I request a quick reconfigure?
> >
> > 1) Let's remove tomcat.
> > 2) Restore the config such that http://brutus.apache.org/gump/{flavour}
> goes
> > to /usr/local/gump/{flavour}/results.
> >
> > I've reconfigure both public and jdk15 (and test) to write here &
stopped
> > the XDOCs output, am trying the better tested XHTML.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Darn, seems I picked a day to get stuck behind a config change, when Leo is
able to help out quickly. Hmm. We are getting HTML in {flavour}/results but
they aren't visible. :(

Can anybody help me out with this, I'd like to ensure that this release is
working as well as the old (I found one delete issue), if not better.

If I don't get a response shortly I'll give a go at using XDOCs again.

regards,

Adam
- Original Message - 
From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gump code and data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: brutus may be having a problem


>
> >
> > http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/modules.html
> >
>
> Yup, maybe my merge has some kinks to work out. Still, Leo (or other),
could
> I request a quick reconfigure?
>
> 1) Let's remove tomcat.
> 2) Restore the config such that http://brutus.apache.org/gump/{flavour}
goes
> to /usr/local/gump/{flavour}/results.
>
> I've reconfigure both public and jdk15 (and test) to write here & stopped
> the XDOCs output, am trying the better tested XHTML.
>
> regards,
>
> Adam
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-08 Thread Adam R. B. Jack

>
> http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/modules.html
>

Yup, maybe my merge has some kinks to work out. Still, Leo (or other), could
I request a quick reconfigure?

1) Let's remove tomcat.
2) Restore the config such that http://brutus.apache.org/gump/{flavour} goes
to /usr/local/gump/{flavour}/results.

I've reconfigure both public and jdk15 (and test) to write here & stopped
the XDOCs output, am trying the better tested XHTML.

regards,

Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



brutus may be having a problem

2004-07-08 Thread Stephen McConnell
http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/modules.html
Message: null
Description: No details available.
Sender: org.apache.cocoon.servlet.CocoonServlet
Source: Cocoon Servlet
Request URI
modules.html
cause
/home/gump/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.24/webapps/gump/content/xdocs/modules.xml 
(No such file or directory)
request-uri
/gump/modules.html

Steve.
--
|---|
| Magic by Merlin   |
| Production by Avalon  |
|   |
| http://avalon.apache.org  |
|---|
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]