Re: [web site] link to anchor within same page not working
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:13:14PM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote: David Crossley wrote: Jean T. Anderson wrote: ... base href=http://incubator.apache.org/; / I removed that setting and links to anchors in the same page now work -- at least locally. But it regenerates every page on the site, so I hesitate to commit. What am I likely to break on the incubator site by removing that base setting? Does anyone know a better way to fix this? Nothing will be broken. Leo added that recently to assist with viewing the built pages locally. So it is safe to remove it. .. I'll go ahead and remove it then, but it sounds like it might be a handy tip to add to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html for local testing. +1, sorry, I didn't think of having href=#foo. The true fix here is enabling the relativise functionality for velocity but I'm guessing that's also disabled for a good reason so I'm a bit hesitant to change it without more investigation, which I'm not really looking forward to at the moment. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OFBiz - next steps
Hi all, I have a question for you: what is the iCLA template we should collect from the OFBiz's contributors? The one here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt ? If so, maybe I'm wrong but... I don't see how this document will address the change from a BSD to ASL license since it clearly states that the CLA is for present and future Contributions submitted to the (Apache Software) Foundation. Am I missing something? Jacopo Jim Jagielski wrote: On Feb 8, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Feb 8, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: In that case, each person who ever committed a line of code needs to submit a iCLA which allows their patches (and therefore, once everyone has one on file, the complete codebase) to be relicensed under the AL. Actually, it is only needed from everyone who might own copyright to some part of the work. So, it is those people who have contributed functionality greater than a simple bug fix. Agreed. I was trying to keep it simple, in order to avoid problems with people trying to determine the diff between the 2. :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status page committed
On 2/9/06, Allen Brookes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The xmlbeanscxx status page has been committed. I'm told that http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html needs to be updated with a link to our status page. Can someone please do this or let me know who to ask to get this done? You should update it yourself. See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html for instructions. Thanks. -- justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit: r376793 [1/2] - in /incubator/public/trunk: site-author/stylesheets/ site-publish/ site-publish/guides/ site-publish/incubation/ site-publish/ip-clearance/ site-publish/learn/ site-pub
On Feb 10, 2006, at 10:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Removed base because it disabled links to anchors within the same page. Jean, I am curious about what browser you were using that caused the same-document links to be broken. Can you send me the product version? I ask because the standard requires such links to work regardless of base, and I may need to make some polite suggestions to the developers. BTW, thanks for all the great work on documenting incubator. Roy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit version 0.9-incubating
Jukka has carefully prepared an initial Apache Jackrabbit release with incubating status written all over it, and the Jackrabbit podling PPMC has approved its release. Now we just need at least three +1 votes from the Incubator PMC. +1 from me (verified and tested on OS X). Roy Begin forwarded message: From: Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: February 5, 2006 12:52:11 AM PST To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Jackrabbit version 0.9 Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, On 2/2/06, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote on releasing these packages as Jackrabbit version 0.9. The vote is open for the next 72 hours, and only the votes from Jackrabbit committers are considered binding. The vote passes if at least three +1 votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release the proposed packages as Jackrabbit 0.9 [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... The vote passes with 7 binding +1 votes and no -1 votes. One non-binding +1 vote was also cast. The votes were: Binding votes (Jackrabbit PPMC): +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Stefan Guggisberg +1 Dominique Pfister +1 Peeter Piegaze +1 Serge Huber +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 David Nuescheler Non-binding votes: +1 Chandresh Turakhia Thanks for all the votes! I will now proceed to request approval from the Incubator PMC. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit: r376793 [1/2] - in /incubator/public/trunk: site-author/stylesheets/ site-publish/ site-publish/guides/ site-publish/incubation/ site-publish/ip-clearance/ site-publish/learn/ site-pub
Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Feb 10, 2006, at 10:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Removed base because it disabled links to anchors within the same page. Jean, I am curious about what browser you were using that caused the same-document links to be broken. Can you send me the product version? I ask because the standard requires such links to work regardless of base, and I may need to make some polite suggestions to the developers. Hoping it was a browser issue, I tried it with two browsers on linux: firefox 1.0.7 konqueror 3.3.1 And on Windows XP: internet explorer 6.0.2900 In hindsight, disabled links wasn't a helpful description of the problem. Taking the Project Website Howto link at the bottom of howtoparticipate.html as an example, clicking on it went here: http://incubator.apache.org/#project-website instead of going to that anchor in the local howtoparticipate.html file. -jean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: svn commit: r376793 [1/2] - in /incubator/public/trunk: site-author/stylesheets/ site-publish/ site-publish/guides/ site-publish/incubation/ site-publish/ip-clearance/ site-publish/learn/ site-
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
I'm new to Jackrabbit. I was looking up the repository.xml and found a number
of keywords getting used viz. ${rep.home}, ${wsp.home}, etc. I'm trying to find
out as where are these variables assigned their values in a local file system.
Can somebody please help?
Thanks,
Arindam.
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 2/11/2006 1:36 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r376793 [1/2] - in /incubator/public/trunk:
site-author/stylesheets/ site-publish/ site-publish/guides/
site-publish/incubation/ site-publish/ip-clearance/ site-publish/learn/
site-publish/projects/ site-publish/projects/agila/ site-publish...
On Feb 10, 2006, at 10:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removed base because it disabled links to anchors within the same
page.
Jean, I am curious about what browser you were using that caused the
same-document links to be broken. Can you send me the product version?
I ask because the standard requires such links to work regardless of
base,
and I may need to make some polite suggestions to the developers.
BTW, thanks for all the great work on documenting incubator.
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
winmail.dat---End Message---
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and
any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this
email.
www.wipro.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OFBiz - next steps
On Feb 10, 2006, at 4:51 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi all, I have a question for you: what is the iCLA template we should collect from the OFBiz's contributors? The one here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt ? If so, maybe I'm wrong but... I don't see how this document will address the change from a BSD to ASL license since it clearly states that the CLA is for present and future Contributions submitted to the (Apache Software) Foundation. Am I missing something? I don't know if those words have any loaded meanings from a legal perspective, but I think present would include past contributions in the sense that at present they are part of the code base. Or perhaps that isn't a safe way of looking at it? -David smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit version 0.9-incubating
+1 from me. On 2/10/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jukka has carefully prepared an initial Apache Jackrabbit release with incubating status written all over it, and the Jackrabbit podling PPMC has approved its release. Now we just need at least three +1 votes from the Incubator PMC. +1 from me (verified and tested on OS X). Roy Begin forwarded message: From: Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: February 5, 2006 12:52:11 AM PST To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Jackrabbit version 0.9 Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, On 2/2/06, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote on releasing these packages as Jackrabbit version 0.9. The vote is open for the next 72 hours, and only the votes from Jackrabbit committers are considered binding. The vote passes if at least three +1 votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release the proposed packages as Jackrabbit 0.9 [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... The vote passes with 7 binding +1 votes and no -1 votes. One non-binding +1 vote was also cast. The votes were: Binding votes (Jackrabbit PPMC): +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Stefan Guggisberg +1 Dominique Pfister +1 Peeter Piegaze +1 Serge Huber +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 David Nuescheler Non-binding votes: +1 Chandresh Turakhia Thanks for all the votes! I will now proceed to request approval from the Incubator PMC. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OFBiz - next steps
David, maybe you are right... but the past contributions were made to the OFBiz project not to the ASF. Are we sure we should use the ASF iCLA as is? Jacopo David E. Jones wrote: On Feb 10, 2006, at 4:51 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi all, I have a question for you: what is the iCLA template we should collect from the OFBiz's contributors? The one here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt ? If so, maybe I'm wrong but... I don't see how this document will address the change from a BSD to ASL license since it clearly states that the CLA is for present and future Contributions submitted to the (Apache Software) Foundation. Am I missing something? I don't know if those words have any loaded meanings from a legal perspective, but I think present would include past contributions in the sense that at present they are part of the code base. Or perhaps that isn't a safe way of looking at it? -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Issues] Kabuki Bootstrap
At the beginning of the week I opened INFRA-714[1] and 715[2] to create the necessary mailing lists and source repository for the new Kabuki incubator project. (Is this the right thing to be doing?) Anyway, they are still unassigned so I thought I'd ask if there's anyone with enough karma+knowledge to resolve these issues so we can start moving forward. The mailing lists are much more important so that we can start project discussions. The source repository, while also important, can be delayed because it will take me a little time to massage the current code base (e.g. changing package names, license blocks, etc) to put it into Subversion. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-714 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-715 -- Andy Clark * Zimbra * [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Issues] Kabuki Bootstrap
Andrew Clark wrote: At the beginning of the week I opened INFRA-714[1] and 715[2] to create the necessary mailing lists and source repository for the new Kabuki incubator project. (Is this the right thing to be doing?) Anyway, they are still unassigned so I thought I'd ask if there's anyone with enough karma+knowledge to resolve these issues so we can start moving forward. The mailing lists are much more important so that we can start project discussions. The source repository, while also important, can be delayed because it will take me a little time to massage the current code base (e.g. changing package names, license blocks, etc) to put it into Subversion. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-714 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-715 Assuming the project has been accepted for Incubation, you need the project status report before any infrastructure stuff will happen. http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html See the Edit your project status report section. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit version 0.9-incubating
+1 (non binding) I got the code from the 0.9 branch in svn, and ran all the unit tests, no failures On Feb 10, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Jukka has carefully prepared an initial Apache Jackrabbit release with incubating status written all over it, and the Jackrabbit podling PPMC has approved its release. Now we just need at least three +1 votes from the Incubator PMC. +1 from me (verified and tested on OS X). Roy Begin forwarded message: From: Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: February 5, 2006 12:52:11 AM PST To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Jackrabbit version 0.9 Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, On 2/2/06, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote on releasing these packages as Jackrabbit version 0.9. The vote is open for the next 72 hours, and only the votes from Jackrabbit committers are considered binding. The vote passes if at least three +1 votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release the proposed packages as Jackrabbit 0.9 [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... The vote passes with 7 binding +1 votes and no -1 votes. One non-binding +1 vote was also cast. The votes were: Binding votes (Jackrabbit PPMC): +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Stefan Guggisberg +1 Dominique Pfister +1 Peeter Piegaze +1 Serge Huber +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 David Nuescheler Non-binding votes: +1 Chandresh Turakhia Thanks for all the votes! I will now proceed to request approval from the Incubator PMC. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [doc] podling software releases
Jean T. Anderson wrote: This is a follow up on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-14, which I opened to track this doc topic. I'd like to clarify the Releases section in http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html (I'll also add a table of contents to the top of that page to make it easier to navigate). ... Thanks for the input, everyone. I updated http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases. Feel free to tweak. -jean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrong source format for xmlbeanscxx status report
Please follow the instructions at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html You have used an old html source format for the xmlbeanscxx status report. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
